CSU Social Criminological Theories discussion

timer Asked: Mar 8th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description


For this scholarly activity, you will explain the link between crime patterns, trends, and theory. Referencing Chapters 7 and 8, you will focus on social criminological theories and their relation to crime rates.

Select two theories (one from Chapter 7 and one from Chapter 8), and include responses to the following points in your scholarly activity:

  • Explain the theories (one to two paragraphs for each theory). In your explanation, include how these would either raise or lower the crime rate and your rationale as to why.
  • Explain how peer groups, families, and social organizations positively or negatively affect your theory.
  • Explain your thoughts on the theories as far as their applicability to explain crime. Do you think these are relevant? Why, or why not? Is there anything missing that would make them explain crime better?

Your scholarly activity must be a minimum of two pages in length. Outside sources are not a requirement; however, if you choose to use outside sources, they must be cited and referenced.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

UNIT V STUDY GUIDE Social Theories and Social Conflict Theories Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to: 4. Analyze the application of criminological theories to crime patterns and trends. 5. Explain patterns of offenses and victimization. Reading Assignment Chapter 7: Social Process and Social Development—It’s What We Learn Chapter 8: Social Conflict—It’s How We Relate Unit Lesson Social Process Theories Social process theories are associated with beliefs that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with others. They are considered a foundation for both early criminological theories and those that exist in today’s era. Social process theorists contend that crime is committed because of two primary reasons: biological variances and psychological traits (Schmalleger, 2016). How do humans interact with one another? Do we learn from one another? If so, how? In most instances, the answer is “yes, we do, and on a daily basis!” These are the three questions that social process theorists attempt to answer and prove with each and every individual interaction. These interactions include socialization and cultural exchange processes through exchanges with individuals and groups. This typically occurs through established relationships with others and groups. It can also occur in certain new relationships and social interactions. Under the social process theory, the groups can range from as small as two individuals to large audiences. Also, social theorists concentrate on how to associate meanings with certain things. Social process theory example: An individual has been married to his wife for several years and has ignored his spouse’s request for a separation and divorce. One day, when the man arrives home from work, he discovers that his wife has moved out of the house with the majority of her personal belongings. However, she has left several joint belongings behind. The husband decides to sell everything that has any meaning to him since it was associated with his now ex-spouse. Was it because he was angry? Based on the example above, it may have to do with the negative interaction of separation and divorce, which led to the association. Social process theorists would take this scenario one step further, and examine why he chose joint belongings and not some of the singular belongings left behind. Theorists would ask the following: (1) What specific negative implications existed that led him to choose one group of belongings instead of the other? (2) If enough time passed, would he choose the other group? (3) Would the interactions be violent at all? If so, how violent? Differential Association This early theory states that criminal behavior is learned rather than associated with biological traits. Differential association theorists further state that this type of criminal behavior is learned by interactions and communication with like-minded individuals. The communication can be in-person, over the phone, or through mass communication methods. In today’s era, behavior can be communicated to small or large groups very easily. This is one of the main ways that the theory has changed over time. In the beginning, differential association only occurred in smaller groups. One of the components of differential association is that criminals BCJ 2501, Criminology 1 x STUDY GUIDE test the boundaries of local, state, and federal laws. Individuals like to test the UNIT boundaries to see how far they go before attracting the attention of law enforcement. Title Differential association example: As outlined above, differential association states that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with one another or as group. Consider a typical teenager; is it difficult for a teen to become inspired by another teenager to behave negatively? Many would argue that teens can be very easily influenced. Teenagers want to fit in with their peers and may take extreme measures to please and impress their friends in any way possible. If a teenager is associated with a “questionable” group, then it is not hard for him or her to be exposed to illegal and troubling behavior. If the leader of the group uses peer pressure as a motivator, he or she can then have others in the group commit criminal behavior by teaching how to complete the task. An example would be the leader of a group smashing a car window and stealing an iPod from the victim’s glove compartment. All of those involved have now witnessed and “learned” how to complete this criminal behavior. The likelihood of this crime being duplicated by those involved is very high. Also, the frequency of similar events is very high. Social Development Theory Social development theories encompass several factors to include psychological, biological, emotional, interpersonal, cultural, societal, and other ecological levels (Schmalleger, 2016). These factors are highlighted by socialization between both individuals and groups. Social development theory example: A father takes his son to the lake to teach him to cast a fishing rod and to fish for freshwater largemouth bass. In the beginning, the father wants to assess his son’s current skills. He asks his son to complete a cast on his own. At first, the son is unable to cast the fishing line and tangles the fishing reel. The father then fixes the fishing pole and shows his son how to properly cast. The son then tries again and improves but fails to complete the task. After spending an hour or so at the lake, his father has shown him an additional dozen times how to properly cast the fishing pole. On the 13th try, his son then completes a full cast. His son acknowledges the positive engagement and encouragement. At that time, his father moves to the other side of the lake to allow his son to master the task on his own without the presence of a parent. Thus, the child builds competence and confidence in completing this new task. Social Control Theory Social control theories focus on reducing levels of criminal behavior by examining antisocial and social behavior. When certain individuals' behaviors are challenged by external factors or individuals, then adverse actions and crimes, such as violent assaults (behavior), can occur. Additionally, if an individual does not know or has never been taught the proper behavior, then adverse reactions and behaviors can occur as well. The duration of this delinquent behavior can vary from a short outburst to an extended period of criminally-infused behavior. However, theorists also state that if an individual has high morals, good self-judgment, and selfcontrol, criminal behavior can be avoided, and these individuals can live in society within the boundaries of local, state, and federal laws. Social Control Theories Containment theory: Containment behavior highlights the importance of abiding by the law. In most instances, there are two components to preventing criminal behavior. This control theory outlines that both internal and external factors force citizens to comply with the law. Individuals that typically fall under this control theory are usually upstanding citizens and are not often tempted to break the law or to contribute to individual/group criminal behavior. Control balance theory: The control balance theory focuses on explaining the importance of maintaining control in criminal behavior. How much control does an individual have over another? How much control does that individual have over a group? Maintaining a balance is linked to maintaining a control ratio between those involved with the behavior. The ratio can often be used to determine the probability and type of criminal activity that will take place. Social bond theories: This theory states that individuals link themselves with others in society (Schmalleger, 2016). These deviants typically do not operate as independent parties. In fact, many integrate themselves into living and associating with like-minded individuals in society. Further, social bond theorists articulate that BCJ 2501, Criminology 2 UNIT act x STUDY GUIDE those who participate under this theory already know that the behavior is a criminal and choose to complete the behavior regardless of the consequences. Title Social bond theory example: As a young girl moves through the childhood stages and into her teenage years, she forms a deep bond with her older cousin. Her cousin attends college, works part-time, and plays volleyball. The young girl decides she wants to play volleyball for her high school just like her cousin. It is not uncommon for one to become attached or bonded to another family member or close friend. In this unit and throughout the course, we have discussed different theories on how individuals may be impacted by observing and or being influenced by others. In the social bond theory, one often attaches him or herself to a role model, best friend, or close sibling. By bonding over a period of years, the individual often develops the same behaviors. If the individual he or she is bonding to commits deviant behavior, then he or she will often do the same. If the bonding partner follows a non-deviant path, then the young friend will probably do the same. Conclusion As you can see, there are vast differences between social development, social process, and social control theories in criminology. It is imperative to understand that all of the theories discussed in this course lesson are ever-changing. The theories outlined above are derived from historical concepts and modern-day theories. In this unit, your required reading and assignment will focus on social process; social development; social conflict; gender; social life attributes; and crime patterns, trends, and theory. Reference Schmalleger, F. (2016). Criminology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson. Suggested Reading The below chapter presentations align with your required reading assignment. Viewing them can help reinforce the concepts covered:   Click here to access the Chapter 7 Presentation. Click here to view a PDF of this presentation.   Click here to access the Chapter 8 Presentation. Click here to view a PDF of this presentation. BCJ 2501, Criminology 3 ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

School: Rice University



Social Criminological Theories
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation




Social criminological theories entail beliefs that criminal behavior arises from interaction
in society with other people. The social forums are considered as the foundation of early
criminological theories. Theorists in the social process content on two primary causes of crime,
biological and psychological traits. According to the social criminological theories, the
interaction of humans plays a significant role in determining the rate and type of crimes
committed in society (Schmalleger, 2016). The two social theories include the development and
the bond theories based on the interaction of people ad crime rate.
The social development ...

flag Report DMCA

Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality not just of the tutors but the moderators too. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors