EH1020 Columbia Southern Universal Healthcare For All Literature Review

User Generated

pbzznaqzp

Writing

EH1020

Columbia Southern University

Description

This is on Universal Healthcare for all



Draft of Introduction and Literature Review

Follow the directions below for the completion of the introduction and literature review draft assignment for Unit IV. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance.

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to begin drafting your academic argumentative research paper.

Description: In this assignment, you will first write your literature review; then, you will write your introduction. Please see "Lesson 4: The Introduction" for details on why it is suggested that you begin the drafting process with the literature review instead of the introduction. The following details are requirements of the assignment:

  • Introduction (9-12 well-developed sentences/approximately 350 words): For more details about what is expected for each of the following sentences, please see "Lesson 4: The Introduction." You may also want to review the "Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments)." The following components must be included in the introduction (in the following order).
    • Sentence 1: Introduce the general topic
    • Sentence 2: Pro side (general)
    • Sentence 3: Con side (general)
    • Sentence 4: Narrow the scope (1)
    • Sentence 5: Examples of the narrowed topic
    • Sentence 6: Narrow the scope (2)
    • Sentence 7: Specific controversy
    • Sentence 8: Pro side (specific)
    • Sentence 9: Con side (specific)
    • Sentence 10: The thesis
  • Literature Review (800-900 words): For details about the structure of the literature review, you will want to review "Lesson 3: The Literature Review: The Process." You may also want to review the "Example Introduction and Literature Review (with comments)." The link is below.
    • Literature review preface: This paragraph acts as a guide to what the reader can expect in the literature review.
    • Literature review body: This section includes three to four body paragraphs that discuss the history, terminology, and both sides of the controversy (pro and con).
    • Literature review conclusion: The conclusion signals that the literature review is ending, but it also acts as a kind of preface for the body of the paper by restating the thesis statement and establishing your argument once again.
  • Demonstrate how to summarize and paraphrase source materials.
  • Demonstrate the avoidance of plagiarism through proper use of APA citations and references for all paraphrased and quoted material.

Example: Click here to access the example introduction and literature review. Note: The conclusion is not presented in this example; however, the literature review conclusion is a requirement of the assignment.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please find attached. Let me know if you need any clarification on the work. I would appreciate to work with you again. Goodbye

Running head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE FOR ALL

Universal Healthcare for All
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE FOR ALL

2

Universal Healthcare for All
Healthcare is a basic need that is supposed to be provided to all people equally without bias
which can be done on a public or private level based on individual capability. On the one hand,
the introduction of universal healthcare was meant for everyone to access quality medical services
irrespective of their background and income bracket. On the other hand, though, the programs
involved in these healthcare initiatives get interfered with when people who can afford healthcare
independently easily qualify. Even with the existence of universal healthcare, the people in need
and those who are eligible for these services miss out because the systems become overloaded with
individuals who are not genuine. According to Meadowcroft (2008), free medical care should be
delivered to all people, but those who can afford it independently should give space to the needy
who have no other options. The kind of inequalities that become experienced when healthcare is
being delivered is as well prejudicial because there should be no gap across different population
groups. When universal healthcare was being implemented, it was meant to solve an existing
problem whereby not everyone could afford quality healthcare while others were capable but
lacked those services at their disposal. Supporters of universal healthcare for all claim that this
initiative helps to reach all the people in need of medical services but do not access due to varying
reasons. On the one hand, there are those who are against it in that it becomes obtained even by
people who do not qualify because they can afford healthcare without depending on free programs
solely. While...


Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags