Write a 750-word essay on Alice Walker’s Everyday Use, defend or refute Mama's beliefs about the use of the items in her home that her daughter wants to take to preserve.

Please help me write an amazing compare and contrast essay on the Orphan Train book and the Orphan Train movie.Movie can be found by going to GOOGLE and typing in Orphan Train Movie, and it should take students to YouTube; click on the 1979 movie.watching the movie, take very specific notes about the characters, the setting, the era, and the situations.The GuidelinesThe essay must be a minimum of four pages (and no, the Works Cited page is not counted as one of the pages).Use the complete writing process to create your essay.Use MLA formatting and guidelines for In-Text citations (4).Include a Works Cited page with the two sources. Assure you have a clear introduction, strongly stated thesis, well - supported paragraphs and an interesting conclusion.Write unified paragraphs that tie support to your Thesis.Write complete and varied sentences; each paragraph should include a strong topic sentenceBuild your paragraphs with specific details, examples, and information from your sources. THE FINAL IMPROMPTU ESSAY WITH PREWRITE IS DUE NO LATER THAN MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2020 BY NOON.

Module 7 Discussion: The First Amendment, Free Speech, & ObscenityThe First Amendment of the Bill of Rights reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Spearheaded by statesman James Madison, the Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights – the first 10 Amendments of the U.S. Constitution – to limit the power of the federal government. Ratified in 1791, the first 10 Amendments establish American civil liberties: the freedoms of U.S. citizens which are protected from infringement by the federal government.Madison crafted the First Amendment to safeguard the following four liberties for U.S. citizens: 1) freedom of the press, 2) freedom of speech, 3) freedom to assemble, and 4) freedom of religion. Since the ratification of the Bill of Rights, scholars and legislators have debated the Founders’ intentions with certain Amendments, such as the First Amendment. For example, "freedom of speech", as stated in the First Amendment, is vague. What exactly is free speech? Did the Founders intend for only the states, and not the federal government, to regulate free speech? No U.S. Court has indicated that freedom of speech is absolute. As such, exactly what forms of free speech are protected? Is false advertising, libel, slander, political speech, social media posts, commercial speech, government speech, campus speech, and/or obscenity protected? If not, why not?Let’s focus on the last aforementioned category of free speech. The Supreme Court has ruled many times throughout U.S. History that freedom of speech does not protect obscenity. Reaching consensus about what constitutes obscenity and how the government should regulate it has spurred fierce debate. The extent to which the nation has grappled with the intersection between law and morality on the one hand, and the role of the state in a democratic society on the other, epitomizes the challenges that result from developing a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote in Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964):I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.In other words, “I can’t define obscenity, but I know it when I see it.”Questions:Examine the image and watch the video below—what do these two primary sources convey about American society's views of obscenity over time?Pretend you are a Supreme Court of the United States Justice who must make a ruling on a case involving obscenity. How would you define obscenity in order to proceed?Continuing in your role as a SCOTUS Justice who must rule on an obscenity case, how would you balance impediments, such as censorship, to U.S. citizens’ right to free speech, while upholding the principles of a free, democratic republic?"Get thee behind me, (Mrs.) Satan!", by Thomas Nast, 1872, Library of Congress Summary: Wife, carrying heavy burden of children and drunk husband, saying to Mrs. Satan (Victoria Woodhull), "I'd rather travel the hardest path of matrimony than follow your footsteps." Mrs. Satan holds sign "Be saved by free love."George Carlin - 7 dirty words (best part)