Week 4 Case Study(building a coalition)

Sep 26th, 2015
Price: $15 USD

Question description

The Case Study for this week is Building a Coalition, which appears on page 580 of the textbook. page 580.docx

Each student is required to analyze this week’s case study and submit a two- to three-page paper addressing the key questions identified below. Remember that all case studies present both too much and too little information. There may be information presented that is not really relevant, and there may be scant information about a key area. This analysis does require interpretation of the information, and there is no one right answer; however, you must explain and defend any assumptions you made, or conclusions resulting from your analysis with citations from the text, or from the case itself. There is no need to research outside sources for this paper.

Your paper must include the following labeled sections.

 Category Points Description
Part I: Group Development15Identify and summarize the stages of group development. Reflecting on the case and textbook material, what stage is the group at now? How could an understanding of the stages of group development have assisted the Woodson Foundation in building a cohesive coalition? Support your conclusion with evidence from the case and our text.
Part II: Problem Identification30Identify key problems. Identify primary and secondary problems the Woodson Foundation is facing. Identify what the organization should have understood about individual membership in teams in order to have built group processes that were supportive of her groups' goals. Do not necessarily limit yourself to only team theory here. Plumb any concepts we have covered to date if you feel they are relevant.
Part III: Retrospective Evaluation40Given that there is no one perfect solution for this situation, identify, describe, and defend two possible solutions to the primary problem(s). Clearly identify and defend both courses of action. Identify and discuss specific steps needed to implement your selections. Support your selections with evidence from the case, the text, or weekly discussion. Remember that deciding on a course of action entails envisioning and planning the steps to success. Be sure to identify implementation steps for both possible solutions. Almost every situation presented with relation to group dynamics and behavior can have multiple avenues for remedy. It is important to develop the ability to critically evaluate more than one alternative, and rationally identify pros and cons of each. Presenting pros and cons for the identified alternative solutions in a table format within the paper is acceptable.
Part IV: Reflection15What would you advise as a strategy for managing diversity issues for program leaders?

Grading Rubrics
CriteriaFailed to Meet Minimum StandardsMet Minimum Standards 60% = 60 points, DSatisfactory 70% = 70 points, CGood 80% = 80 points, BSuperior 90% = 90 points, A
Part I: Group Development (15 points)No problem summary included 0Identifies the stages of group development with some summary; does not tie theory back to the case 9Identifies the stages of group development with some summary, and ties theory to the case situation with minimal supporting evidence from the case and text 11Identifies the stages of group development and ties theory to the case situation with supporting evidence from the case and text 13Clearly and accurately identifies the primary issues presented by the case with clear supporting evidence from the case 15
Part II: Problem Identification (30 points)No possible solutions discussed 0Discusses case in general terms with no insight into the real issues presented 20Discusses issues presented by the case generally, without supporting references; identifies secondary issues, not primary issues 23Identifies the primary issues presented by the case with some supporting references to the case 26Clearly and accurately identifies primary and secondary issues presented by the case with clear supporting evidence from the case 30
Part III: Retrospective Evaluation (40 points)None provided 0Does not clearly identify or explain selected recommendation for solutions 27Identifies recommended solutions with no implementation steps 31Clearly identifies recommended solutions with discussion of implementation steps at a summary level 35Gives a clear and focused analysis with implementation recommendations; directly relates selection to course readings 40
Part IV: Reflection (15 points)None provided 0Perfunctory effort at answering question 10Summary level reflection on leadership 11.5Good faith effort in examining leadership issue with supporting material 13.0Well-presented insights into leadership issue with supporting material 15

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: Cornell University

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Sep 28th, 2015
"Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back!"
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1820 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors