Hello,Here are the instructions for the case study:Research a recent security breach that has occurred within the past year. Write a 1-2 page case study report that explains the attack and what could have been done to prevent the attack. Explain the threats and vulnerabilities within the organization. What was the role of management in this attack? What would be your recommendations to prevent such an attack from occurring in the future?Submit your paper by the posted due date. Refer to the rubric for detailed grading criteria. Here is the grading rubric:MGMT 394 1.5 Case Study RubricMGMT 394 1.5 Case Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem25.0 pts(Excellent - A) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in the case study. Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues.23.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.21.0 pts(Average - C) Identifies and understands some of the issues in the case study. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the case.19.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study. Incomplete analysis of the issues.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in case study. No analysis of the issues.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswers to Case Study Questions20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Answers to case study questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Answers to case study questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.16.0 pts(Average - C) Answers to case study questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Answers to case study questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Does not address the case study questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComments on effective solutions/strategies20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Well documented, reasoned, and pedagogically appropriate comments on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case study.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Appropriate, well thought out comments about solutions, or proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study.16.0 pts(Average - C) Superficial and/or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Little or no action suggested, and/or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Provided no feasible solutions or strategies to the issues in the case study.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research20.0 pts(Excellent - A) Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings.18.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Good research and documented links to the material read.16.0 pts(Average - C) Limited research and documented links to any readings.14.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Incomplete research and links to any readings.12.0 pts(Failing - F) Provided no references or support of analysis.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics15.0 pts(Excellent - A) Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.12.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may be too general. Sentences generally clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but not impede understanding.10.0 pts(Average - C) Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding.8.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Tends to being vague and abstract, or very personal and specific. Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence structure is simple or monotonous. Usually contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader's understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts.6.0 pts(Failing - F) Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abusive.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0

Discussion:From textbook, end of chapter 5. Focus on Editing: The Hurt LockerKathryn Bigelow’s 2009 film The Hurt Locker follows a U.S. Army bomb squad (Bravo Company) in Iraq as it counts down to the end of its mission.Use the questions below to analyze how the basic elements, techniques, and strategies of editing contribute to the visual and story content of this scene: The Hurt Locker (4/9) Movie CLIP - We're Done (2008) HD (Links to an external site.)1 Elements of EditingIsolate and observe the individual shots in this sequence.What, if anything, do these individual shots mean on their own, independent of their context to previous and subsequent shots?How does their meaning change in context with the other shots in the sequence?How would you describe the rhythm or tempo of the sequence or of the film as a whole?How does the editing contribute to this effect?Do the filmmakers employ any alternatives to the cut, such as a fade, iris, or dissolve? If so, discuss how this effect works.Can you discern any tonal or graphic relationships between the shots?2 Continuity EditingIs the editing style of the film invisible, or does it draw attention to itself?Identify the master shot in the sequence. How does that shot establish the spatial relationships in the scene?Find a sequence that includes a prolonged conversation. Observe and discuss how techniques such as the 180 degree rule and shot/reverse shot are used to capture the visual and narrative content of the scene.Does the sequence include an eyeline match? How is this technique used to communicate story information?3 Alternative Editing StylesDoes the film draw attention to the editing in any way, and if it does, how does this affect your reading of the scene and/or the film?Does the film use jump cuts? How and why

Assignment 3: Startup FundsDue Week 7 and worth 100 pointsWrite a one page overview of your plan for the startup funds and working capital strategy for your business plan. Remember, you will take feedback from all submitted portions of your plan, revise, and then submit the final business plan in Week 9.Write a one (1) page paper in which you:Describe what startup funds and working capital are.Propose a method for obtaining the necessary funds for your business.Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Examine the process of developing a business plan and setting up the company.Analyze money sources for finding and managing funds.Determine the most effective communication process to present the business to investors.Use technology and information resources to research issues in entrepreneurship.Write clearly and concisely about entrepreneurship using proper writing mechanics.Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.