PSY 304 Arizona State Deciding Advantageously article questions

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 23rd, 2019
account_balance_wallet $25

Question Description

Must find and read this article in order to answer all the questions from Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295.

All the questions are upload in Word document as well as the pdf aricle. If unable to open the article please let me know and I can screenshot it.

APA format and minimum of 800 words

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy Bechara, Antoine;Damasio, Hanna;Tranel, Daniel;Damasio, Antonio R Science; Feb 28, 1997; 275, 5304; ProQuest pg. 1293 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Instructions The assigned article by Bechara, Damasio, Tranel, and Damasio (1997) was a germinal contribution in the exploration of "thinking without explicitly thinking." For our assignment, you will compare the approach of critical thinking (as learned so far in this course) with the idea of thinking without explicitly thinking proposed in Bechara et al. (1997). Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295. 1. Summarize the article (What is the purpose of the experiment? Who are the participants? What is measured, How is that "what" measured? What are the Findings & Conclusions?) 2. Contrast the main idea of that article with the critical thinking approaches we have learned in the first two modules in this course. Compare and contrast the two divergent ways to process information in each source. For example, from the textbook: clarifying and analyzing information vs. from the article: allowing nonconscious bias be your guide. You will contrast the nonconscious thinking approaches discussed in article with the core critical thinking skills discussed in the text (see page 34 of the textbook). As indicated in the example above, please select a minimum of two core critical thinking skills to contrast with the nonconscious thinking approaches evidenced in the study discussed in the assigned article. Some examples are analysis, evaluation, explanation, self-regulation, or interpretation I would definitely look over the table provided on page 34 of chapter 2 4. How would you reconcile the two approaches in your quest to become a strong critical thinker? Is there value to each of the information processing methods (the strategy described of thinking without explicitly thinking discussed in the article and the critical thinking strategies described in the text); what is the value? 5. Cite at least one other scholarly article along with Bechara et al. (1997) and the textbook (Facione & Gittens, 2015). Hint: Feel free to considering using one of the sources cited in the article. The references cited at the end of the article provide links to other sources cited in the assigned article. You may follow these links to other articles, review these articles, and use these sources to inform your paper. 6. Be mindful of grammar and writing mechanics. The paper should be a minimum of 800 words (this word count DOES NOT include your reference section or cover page), and meet the standards of APA style. You may find the attached template to be helpful in constructing an APA-styled paper. REVIEW to guide to writing a psychology paper provided in the link above this assignment. Accordingly, DO NOT write in the 1st or 2nd person (i.e., no "I", "We", "You", etc.) - formal writing in completed in the 3rd person. Third-person point of view uses proper nouns (such as given name, "John Smith") or nouns (such as researchers, participants, one, etc.) or pronouns (such as "they").In general, formal academic writing discourages the use of first or second person as it makes writing present as less objective. Always include an introduction and a conclusion in all formal writing assignments. Running head: SHORTENED TITLE 1 Your Full Title Goes Here Your Name Name University Class Name Professor’s Name Due Date 2 SHORTENED TITLE Your Full Title Goes Here Begin your paper here. Provide introduction here. Introduce the topic that will be discussed. Always write in the third person. Do not use “I”, “You”, etc. in formal writing assignments. Any time you use any information that you learned from another source, you should always use an in-text citation to give credit to the original author (Last Name, Year). Introduce a quote, “if you use a direct quotation, you must also include the page number that the quotation came from in your citation” (Last Name, Year, p. #). If you are a psychology major, please consider getting a current copy of the APA formatting manual. This template will help with some of the formatting guidelines, but you should not rely on it to give you all of the information you will need. First Level Subheading Your first level subheading should be centered, bold, and written in upper and lower case letters. Typically, you only want to include a subheading if you have at least two of them per level. Second Level Subheading Your second level subheading should be left-aligned, bold, and written in upper and lower case letters. Third level subheading. Your third level subheading should be indented, bold, and written in lower case letters (except for the first letter and proper nouns). It should be capitalized in the same way you should capitalize a normal sentence. You also start your paragraph on the same line as this subheading. For additional levels of subheadings, see the APA manual. Provide a clear conclusion that incorporates major themes and findings from your analyses. 3 SHORTENED TITLE References Last, F. M. (Year). Title of the article in lower case letters. Name of the Journal in Upper and Lower Case Letters, Vol#(Iss#), page numbers. doi:#### Wolfe, J., Brunelli, D. N., Rubinstein, J., & Horowitz, T. S. (2013). Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: Trained observers miss rare targets, too. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1-9. doi:10.1167/13.3.33 (Note that the references should be ordered alphabetically by last name of first author.) ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Microtutor_Burchu
School: Cornell University

Attached.

Running head: CRITICAL THINKING

1

Critical Thinking
Your Name
Name University
Class Name
Professor’s Name
Due Date

CRITICAL THINKING

2
Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is a crucial step in the lives of a person. It assists a person to make
crucial decisions concerning important issues. For this reason, the paper will provide a summary
of the article that shows how to make decisions that will be of benefit to a person before knowing
the next important strategy. On top of that, it will look into the comparison of the agenda of the
article and the two different ways of processing information. It will conclude by showing how
the approaches can be reconciled to show critical thinking.
Summary of the Article
The article elucidates about making a decision to your advantage before knowing the
beneficial strategy. It goes ahead to explain that when an individual is in a sophisticated
situation, proper and accurate reasoning is essential. This involves having concrete knowledge on
the important details about the premises, options on taking the next course of action, and the
repercussions that were witnessed on the previous experience. Nonetheless, the article further
revealed that an optional possibility was analyzed. The revelation was that blatant reasoning
followe...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors