critical evaluation in supply chain management

timer Asked: Mar 27th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $40

Question Description

the following task is a critical evaluation in supply chain management

a list of topics are given in the file, the critical evaluation should be in depth of the field

please read the file for more details

and only bid on the question if certain to deliver quality work.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Learning Outcomes 3. critically appraise the implications of the way in which Enterprise-Wide Systems affect people, processes, structures and operational management, and be able to identify and define potential problems and solutions. 4. identify and explain the major objectives, critical success factors and characteristics of Enterprise-Wide Systems and their implementation. Word Count 2000 maximum (as specified by the Coursework length protocol) A Critical Literature Review You are required to carry a critical review of peer-reviewed academic articles choosing one of the following areas. Note that the term Supply Chain Management (SCM) here means that if you want to focus on Procurement, this is possible as Procurement may be viewed as part of SCM. • • • • • • • Enterprise wide Systems and Supply Chain Management; Business Intelligence/Analytics and Supply Chain Management; Big Data and Supply Chain Management Information Management and Supply Chain Integration; Information Management and Change Management (Business Transformation). Information Management and Supply Chain Management. New Technology impact on Supply Chain Management This task requires the selection of a minimum of five (5) articles taken from at least three (3) different journals and different editions where the same journal is selected. THREE of these articles should be original research articles. The other two may be either/both Conceptual papers or Literature Reviews. The length of these articles should be a minimum of eight (8) pages, excluding the references or diagrams. Shorter journals can still be used to support your position or arguments but cannot be included as one of the five core articles. Within the area of your choice, you will need to focus your Review. For example, New Technology impact on SCM could have a focus on use of automation in warehousing OR a focus on use of IT systems in transport logistics. Business Intelligence and SCM could focus on a new technology such as Block Chain. Do not attempt to cover several areas, choose your focus first. Students who wish to choose another technology related area and develop a topic from this are welcome to BUT they must get approval from the module leader to ensure the topic relates to the learning outcomes. It is recommended that when writing on use of technology in Supply Chain, references should be no more than five years old. Where older, you need to show that the source you have cited remains current, for example by showing newer sources are using the older work. See below page 7 for detailed guidance to conduct a critical review. Word Count The length of paper should be between 1500 and 2000 words, exceeding this limit will be penalised, see below, it will be difficult to achieve good marks if below this limit. Marking Schema Introduction; • 15% An overview of the topic chosen and the articles chosen, justification, relevance, coherence. Presentation of Findings 30% These should be presented as a TABLE showing sources used, Summary of the findings, Methodology (if applicable), Strengths of the Source, Weakness of the Source and a column stating overall relevance of the source. Critical Analysis; 40% • • • • • Gaps in research, Strengths of the papers, Weaknesses of the papers, Value of arguments/findings, Where should future research focus? General 15% • Full bibliographic details for each of the core articles • Referencing [this is separate to the bibliographic details of the core articles] • Structure and Presentation – including use of UK English • Word Count omission/over limit The length of paper should be between 1500 and 2000 words. No statement of word Deduct 2 marks (an estimate of the word length will be length made and if it is over the limit further deductions will be made as below) 1-100 excess words Deduct 1 mark 101 or more excess words Deduct 1 mark per 50 words started after the first excess 100 Seriously incorrect Deduct 5 marks and other penalties as above appropriate to statement of word length the estimated word length. Format Style layout Layout Style The assignment should be presented as a paper of between 1500 and 2000 words in length, excluding appendices and reference list. It should be of a professional academic journal standard and have the following elements: • Front Title Page: with Paper Title, Task, Full Name, Student Number, and Word Count. • Core Literature Review: see also earlier instructions for content and layout; • • Reference List: giving details of any sources, in Harvard format, you have used in your research (do not separate the types of sources, and include full details for ALL sources). Appendices: as required - containing any relevant supplementary material supporting your paper. Note: Appendices do not attract marks and are rarely used in academic papers. Format to be used: • The paper should be presented in Ariel or Calibri font, 12 point. • Footnotes should be avoided they are not suitable for referencing. A digital copy of this assessment must be submitted, detailed instructions of how to perform this task will be given on BB and in class. What is a Critical Literature Review The literature review should not merely state what has been published but a critique should be carried out. Controversies or disagreements among academics should be spotted and the student should endeavour to take a stand that is logically argued out. Gaps in knowledge, ideas not fully tested and areas for further research can also be spotted from study of existing literature. Used in this way, academic underpinning from literature review can provide question, a research hypothesis or problem to be investigated. Academic underpinning can at so enlighten your investigation, support your methods (including measuring instruments) and provide criteria for evaluating your findings. Reviewing the Literature The literature review is very important as a means of establishing what is already known about the topic you are researching, what gaps there are, and what sorts of theoretical frameworks and concepts are currently being used by researchers in the area. Your search and review of the literature should also enable you to refine, and maybe reformulate, the questions that you posed at the outset, and perhaps to identify new ones that can be incorporated. While it is important not to be overawed by the literature, it is also essential to ensure, as far as possible, what is already known. The process of searching the relevant literature is a means to an end. That end is more than a comprehensive and extensive listing of already published theoretical work and research that is pertinent to your topic or research methodology. These sources need to be related to one another and analysed and evaluated in a critical way (note that' critical' does not imply only negativity but rather an evaluation of both strengths and limitations). On any issue of significance views being expressed you will find contrasting seemingly, conflicting evidence being cited and different theoretical perspectives being called in to play. Invariably, it is just these existing contrasts, conflicts and differences which prompt the questions which researchers seek to answer. One key feature of a critical literature review is to attempt to impose an order on these differences to identify the main protagonist and how they relate to one another and to show which research evidence contributes to which arguments, and why. A further important part of the review process is the scrutiny of the research methodology employed and the form of analysis of the data collected. Do different positions on an issue derive from the nature of the evidence on which they are based and the ways in which that evidence was gathered? Are the conclusions justified on the basis of the evidence available? Paper Structure • Bring all of the elements of the answer together into a coherent and critical whole; • Show clear evidence of insight into the topic, to support and act as justification; • Considered and supported for further research opportunities. Paper Content • Active and critical analysis Justified and innovative examples projecting the research into the future ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

School: New York University


flag Report DMCA

Excellent job

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors