PSY 108 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview Psychology is a fascinating field because of its application to virtually any life experience or situation. In this course and throughout your work on this assessment, you will recognize the practical application of psychology in many different aspects of your life. Hopefully, this application of the perspectives, theories, and research in psychology will help you not only better approach problems in your personal or professional experience, but improve those situations. Not only does psychology help us to better understand others and the world around us, but it also gives us tools to improve the way in which we handle certain situations. For this assessment, you will choose a problem from the provided list to which you can apply the concepts and theories learned in this class. You will then develop an action plan for how you will use psychological ideas and principles in addressing the problem. This assessment will help you recognize the value of psychology, the value of supporting your claims with established views and research, and how psychology can be applied to personal situations. Below is the list of problem choices for your final project: • • • • • • Suicide by LGBT Youth: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to decrease suicide rates among LGBT youth? Childhood Obesity: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to help parents improve childhood obesity rates? Prescription Drug Abuse Among Rural Teens: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to reduce prescription drug abuse among rural teens? Veterans With PTSD and Stigma: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to decrease stigma for veterans with PTSD seeking treatment? Bias in the Workplace: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to reduce bias in workplace hiring and promotion? Raising an Aggressive Child: How can psychological research, theories, and perspectives be used to help parents reduce aggression in young children? This assessment addresses the following course outcomes: • • • • Explain how fundamental theories and perspectives in the field of psychology can be utilized to approach personal and professional problems Determine the credibility of sources in psychology for supporting claims with appropriate evidence Develop basic recommendations for improving problems experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities that are supported by fundamental theories and perspectives in the field of psychology Explain how research and plans supported by psychological theory and perspectives align with the ethical guidelines of psychology Prompt For this assessment, you will explore the theories, research, and perspectives used in psychology and discussed in this course to support an action plan you develop that addresses a problem experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities. You must be able to relate this problem to psychological theories, research, and perspectives discussed in the course. You will review the research provided to determine the value of credibility in research and how the research aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology. You will then develop an action plan that makes recommendations to address and improve the problem. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Getting Started: In this part of the assessment, you will explore the provided research to determine its credibility and how it aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology. A. Describe the problem experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities that your plan will be attempting to improve. B. Select research from the provided resources that will support your plan, and explain how the research is credible. C. Explain how you discerned the credibility of the research provided. D. Discuss how using credible evidence will support your action plan. E. Explain how the research aligns with fundamental theories discussed in the course. F. Describe how the research aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology. II. Plan Support: In this part of the assessment, you will identify theories and perspectives in psychology that will support your future action plan. A. Identify relevant fundamental theories in psychology discussed in the course which could be applied to address the problem. B. Describe how you would apply these fundamental theories in psychology to address the problem. C. Explain how you can use the perspectives of psychologists in different subject areas within the field to approach your problem. D. Describe the ethical implications that will need to be considered in the creation of your action plan. III. Action Plan: In this part of your assessment, you will develop your action plan, describing the overall plan that addresses the problem, as well as the specific recommendations as to how to improve the problem. You will explain how your action plan aligns with fundamental theories and perspectives in psychology and how your action plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology. A. Describe your overall action plan and how it addresses the problem. B. Make recommendations as to how you could improve the identified problem. Be sure to reference how psychology is used to support the action plan in improving the problem. C. Explain how fundamental theories and perspectives in psychology align with your action plan. D. Explain how your plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology. Milestones Milestone One: Getting Started—Problem In Module One, you will submit a draft of your problem description. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Credible Evidence Evaluation In Module Two, you will submit a credible evidence evaluation. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Milestone Three: Plan Support In Module Three, you will submit a draft of your theories and perspectives. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric. Milestone Four: Recommendations In Module Five, you will submit a summary describing your action plan and recommendations to resolve your chosen problem. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Four Rubric. Final Project Submission: Action Plan In Module Seven, you will submit your final action plan. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric (below). Milestone Deliverable Deliverables Module Due Grading One Getting Started—Problem One Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric Two Credible Evidence Evaluation Two Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric Three Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric Five Graded separately; Milestone Four Rubric Seven Graded separately; Final Project Rubric (below) Three Plan Support Four Recommendations Final Project Submission: Action Plan Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your action plan should be 3–4 pages in length, with 12-point Times New Roman font and double spacing. The research you have chosen should be appropriately cited. Critical Elements Getting Started: Problem Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria and description of the problem is especially detailed and clear Proficient (85%) Describes the problem experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities, that the plan will attempt to improve Getting Started: Credible Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation demonstrates a keen insight into the characteristics and qualities that make research credible or not credible Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation demonstrates keen insight into the process of discerning the credibility of psychological research Meets “Proficient” criteria and discussion demonstrates keen insight into the value of supporting claims with credible evidence Meets “Proficient” criteria and response makes cogent connections regarding the relationship between theory and research Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the ethical guidelines in psychology Selects research that will support plan and explains how the research is credible Getting Started: Discerned Getting Started: Credible Evidence Getting Started: Fundamental Theories Getting Started: Ethical Guidelines Needs Improvement (55%) Describes the problem experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities, that the plan will attempt to improve but description is cursory Selects research that will support plan and explains how the research is credible, but research selected is misaligned with plan or explanation is cursory or inaccurate Explains how the credibility of the research was discerned but explanation is cursory or illogical Not Evident (0%) Does not describe the problem experienced by individuals, families, groups, or communities, that the plan will attempt to improve Discusses how using credible evidence will support the action plan Explains how the research aligns with fundamental theories discussed in the course Explains how the credibility of the research was discerned Describes how the research aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology Value 5 Does not select research that will support plan 7.5 Does not explain how the credibility of the research was discerned 7.5 Discusses how using credible evidence will support the action plan, but discussion is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not discuss how using credible evidence will support the action plan 7.5 Explains how the research aligns with fundamental theories discussed in the course but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Describes how the research aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain how the research aligns with fundamental theories discussed in the course 5.63 Does not describe how the research aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology 7.5 Plan Support: Fundamental Theories Meets “Proficient” criteria and discussion demonstrates keen insight into which fundamental theories are the most relevant and applicable to the problem Meets “Proficient” criteria and description demonstrates keen insight into how to apply fundamental theories to address problems Meets “Proficient” criteria and description makes cogent connections between how the perspectives of psychologists can be used together to approach the problem Identifies relevant fundamental theories discussed in the course which could be applied to address the problem Plan Support: Ethical Implications Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the ethical implications involved in the development of an action plan Describes the ethical implications that will need to be considered in the creation of the action plan Action Plan: Overall Action Plan Meets “Proficient” criteria and description demonstrates keen insight into how the overall action plan will address the problem Meets “Proficient” criteria and recommendations made demonstrate keen insight into how psychology is used and assists the recommendations in improving the problem Describes the overall action plan and how it addresses the problem Plan Support: Apply Plan Support: Perspectives Action Plan: Recommendations Describes how the fundamental theories would be applied to address the problem Describes how perspectives of psychologists in different subject areas within the field could be used to approach the problem Makes recommendations as to how the problem could be improved and how psychology is used to support the recommendations in improving the problem Identifies fundamental theories discussed in the course but identified theories are not relevant or could not be applied to the problem Describes how the fundamental theories would be applied to address the problem but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies Discusses how perspectives of psychologists could be used to approach the problem but discussion is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or does not reference different subject areas within the field Describes the ethical implications that will need to be considered in the creation of the action plan, but description is cursory or ethical implications do not align with focus of action plan Describes the overall action plan and how it addresses the problem but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not identify fundamental theories discussed in the course 5.63 Does not describe how the identified fundamental theories could be applied to address the problem 5.63 Does not discuss how perspectives of psychologists could be used to approach the problem 5.63 Does not describe the ethical implications that will need to be considered in the creation of the action plan 7.5 Does not describe the overall action plan and how it addresses the problem 7.5 Makes recommendations as to how the problem could be improved but recommendations made are cursory, contain inaccuracies, or do not reference how psychology is used to support the plan in improving the problem Does not make recommendations as to how the problem could be addressed 7.5 Action Plan: Fundamental Theories and Perspectives Action Plan: Ethical Guidelines of Psychology Articulation of Response Meets “Proficient” criteria and response demonstrates a keen ability integrating fundamental theories in psychology into response to support the action plan Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation demonstrates keen insight into how the plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Explains how fundamental theories and perspectives in psychology align with the action plan Explains how fundamental theories and perspectives in psychology align with the action plan but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain how fundamental theories and perspectives in psychology align with the action plan 7.5 Explains how the plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology Explains how the plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain how the plan aligns with the ethical guidelines of psychology 7.5 Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 4.98 Total 100% Journal of Traumatic Stress June 2014, 27, 307–313 Mental Health Beliefs and Their Relationship With Treatment Seeking Among U.S. OEF/OIF Veterans Dawne Vogt,1,2 Annie B. Fox,1 and Brooke A. L. Di Leone1 1 Women’s Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 2 Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Many veterans who would benefit from mental health care do not seek treatment. The current study provided an in-depth examination of mental health-related beliefs and their relationship with mental health and substance abuse service use in a national sample of 640 U.S. Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans. Both concerns about mental health stigma from others and personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment were examined. Data were weighted to adjust for oversampling of women and nonresponse bias. Results revealed substantial variation in the nature of OEF/OIF veterans’ mental health beliefs, with greater anticipated stigma in the workplace (M = 23.74) than from loved ones (M = 19.30), and stronger endorsement of negative beliefs related to mental health treatment-seeking (M = 21.78) than either mental illness (M = 18.56) or mental health treatment (M = 20.34). As expected, individuals with probable mental health problems reported more negative mental health-related beliefs than those without these conditions. Scales addressing negative personal beliefs were related to lower likelihood of seeking care (ORs = 0.80–0.93), whereas scales addressing anticipated stigma were not associated with service use. Findings can be applied to address factors that impede treatment seeking. Recent research suggests that many veterans who might benefit from mental health treatment do not seek care. For example, in a large national survey of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans, nearly half of those who screened positive for probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or major depression reported that they had not received any mental health care in the previous year (Schell & Marshall, 2008). Both beliefs about the extent to which one will be stigmatized by others for experiencing a mental health problem and personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment have been posited as key barriers to care for this population (Vogt, Di Leone, Wang, Sayer, Pineles, & Litz, 2014). The former category builds on Corrigan and colleagues’ extensive body of work on public stigma related to mental illness (e.g., Corrigan, 2004; Corrigan & Rüsch, 2002), and is conceptualized as encompassing concerns about stigma from loved ones, as well as concerns about stigma in the workplace. Personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment, on the other hand, reflect the extent to which individuals have incorporated negative beliefs about mental illness, the nature of mental health treatment, and the appropriateness of seeking treatment for mental health problems into their own personal belief systems (Vogt, 2011). The emphasis on competence, confidence, and stoicism in the military may make negative mental health beliefs an especially salient barrier to care for both current and former military personnel (Nash, Silva, & Litz, 2009; Sayer et al., 2009). Indeed, studies indicate that anticipated stigma is a commonly reported barrier to care in military and veteran samples. For example, in one study approximately one in three OEF/OIF veterans in one study reported that they would be stigmatized by others for seeking mental health treatment (Hoge et al., 2004), and fear of being labeled with a mental health disorder was identified as a concern for nearly three quarters of OIF veterans in another study (Stecker, Fortney, Hamilton, & Ajzen, 2010). Less is known about the extent to which negative personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment serve as a barrier to treatment for military and veteran populations, although accumulating evidence suggests that they are also a concern. For example, among OEF/OIF veterans with mental health problems, 44% indicated that seeking mental health treatment would make them feel down on themselves (Elbogen et al., 2013), and nearly one in five reported that mental health This research was supported, in part, by a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Sciences Research and Development Service grant (DHI 06-225-2; Gender, Stigma, and Other Barriers to VHA Use for OEF/OIF Veterans; PI: Dawne Vogt, PhD). Note: Following completion of this manuscript, Dr. Di Leone relocated to the Philadelphia VA Medical Center. Dr. Di Leone’s current affiliation is the Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VA Medical Center. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dawne Vogt, National Center for PTSD (116B-3), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130. E-mail: Dawne.Vogt@va.gov Published 2014. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com DOI: 10.1002/jts.21919 307 308 Vogt, Fox, and Di Leone treatment should only be sought as a last resort (Kim, Britt, Klocko, Riviere, & Adler, 2011). Negative beliefs about mental health treatment also appear to be common; one in four soldiers in the latter study also reported that they do not trust mental health professionals. Although these mental health beliefs may serve as barriers to care, most military and veteran studies to date have been restricted to clinical samples with demonstrated mental health problems, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn about the extent to which these concerns are relevant for the larger population. A primary aim of the present study was to document concerns about stigma and personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment within a national sample of OEF/OIF veterans. This population represents an ideal target for such a study given that their potential exposure to stressful and traumatic events in the warzone put them at risk for a variety of mental health problems (Tanielian & Jaycox, 2008). In contrast with prior research, which has primarily relied on convenience samples and failed to consider the impact of nonresponse bias on study findings, both sampling weights and nonresponse bias weights were applied to produce results that would be optimally representative of the larger OEF/OIF population. A second aim of this study was to examine how mental health beliefs differ for veterans with and without mental health problems. Prior studies indicate that OEF/OIF veterans with mental health problems report more negative mental health beliefs than those without mental health problems (e.g., Hoge et al., 2004). We are not aware, however, of any research that has examined the extent to which this finding holds across different mental health belief domains and mental health conditions. Thus, in the present study we examined how mental health beliefs varied for OEF/OIF veterans with and without three common mental health conditions, namely, PTSD, depression, and alcohol abuse. Our final aim was to examine how mental health beliefs are related to the use of mental health care among OEF/OIF veterans with probable PTSD, depression, and alcohol abuse. Findings from the military and veteran literature on the impact of concerns about stigma on treatment seeking have been mixed, with several recent studies suggesting that anticipated stigma from others may be positively, rather than negatively, associated with mental health service use (Olmsted et al., 2011; Rosen et al., 2011; Stecker, Fortney, Hamilton, Sherbourne, & Ajzen, 2010). In contrast, several recent studies suggest a key role for personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment as a barrier to care (Brown, Creel, Engel, Herrell, & Hoge, 2011; Kehle et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2011; Pietrzak et al., 2009; Stecker et al., 2007; Sudom, Zamorski, & Garber, 2012). No studies to our knowledge, however, have provided an in-depth examination of separate domains of personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment as predictors of mental health service use. We had several expectations for the study. We hypothesized that participants would be more likely to report concerns about stigma from others than to endorse negative mental health be- liefs themselves. We also hypothesized that individuals with probable PTSD, depression, and alcohol abuse would be more likely to report both concerns about stigma from others and negative personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment than individuals without these problems, but that only personal mental health beliefs would be related to lower likelihood of seeking mental health services. We had no specific hypotheses regarding differential associations for mental health belief domains or mental health condition given the lack of prior research on these topics. Because some individuals may not endorse negative beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment due to social desirability concerns, social desirability was included in all analyses of associations among study variables. We also accounted for mental health condition symptom severity in analyses examining predictors of service use, given that individuals with more severe symptoms may be more likely to both report negative mental health beliefs and to seek treatment. Method Participants and Procedure We surveyed a national sample of U.S. veterans who had experienced a recent deployment to either Afghanistan (OEF) or Iraq (OIF), and were separated from military service at the time of the study. Names were randomly selected from a Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) roster of all OEF/OIF veterans who had returned from deployment between 2 and 4 years prior to data collection (2007–2009). Women were oversampled to allow for gender-stratified analyses (50% women; 50% men). A modification of the Dillman, Smyth, and Christian (2009) mail survey procedure was used for data collection. Specifically, we first mailed potential participants the survey, an opt-out form, and a $20 gift card. A reminder postcard was mailed 1 week later, followed by a second mailing of the assessment package to nonresponders 4 weeks after the reminder, another reminder postcard 1 week after that, a final survey package 4 weeks later, and a final reminder 1 week after that for a total of 11 weeks from our initial approach. Of 2,950 potential participants, 460 could not be located and 17 responded to indicate that they were ineligible for the study (i.e., not OEF/OIF veterans). Among the remaining 2,473 individuals believed to have received the survey, 707 returned completed surveys for a response rate of 28.6%. We compared survey responders to nonresponders on demographic and military characteristics drawn from DMDC administrative records data to explore the potential for nonresponse bias. Although all differences except the comparison based on Active Duty versus National Guard/Reservist status were statistically significant for these large sample-size comparisons, effects were generally small, suggesting that they were of little clinical significance. Specifically, differences between responders and nonresponders were small with regard to gender (Cramér’s ϕ = −.11), age (r = .19) race (Cramér’s ϕ = −.041), military rank (Cramér’s V = 0.14), education (Cramér’s Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Mental Health Beliefs Among OEF/OIF Veterans ϕ = .19), marital status (Cramér’s ϕ = −.07), military branch (Cramér’s V = 0.08), and duty status (Cramér’s ϕ = .01). For the present study, we limited the sample to only those individuals who completed all stigma and personal belief measures (N = 640). The sample was composed of 56.7% women and was primarily Caucasian (66.8%). The sample included veterans from all service branches: Army (50.7%), Air Force (23.2%), Navy (17.3%), and Marines (8.8%), and the majority was deployed from Active Duty (78.5%). The mean age of participants was 37.23 years (SD = 10.03). Measures Mental health beliefs were assessed with the Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory (EASI; Vogt et al., 2014). Concerns about stigma from others were addressed with the following scales: (a) Concerns about Stigma from Loved Ones, and (b) Concerns about Stigma in the Workplace. Negative personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment were addressed with the following scales: (a) Beliefs about Mental Illness, (b) Beliefs about Mental Health Treatment, and (c) Beliefs about Treatment Seeking. Each scale includes eight items that are framed as statements and rated using a 5-point Likerttype response format from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with a total possible range from 8 to 40. All scales were scored so that higher scores reflected more negative beliefs. Coefficient α for these scales ranged from .84 to .93 in the current sample. Evidence is available for the internal consistency reliability, content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and discriminative validity of EASI scales (Vogt et al., 2014). In addition, confirmatory factor analysis results support the proposed 5-factor structure of this inventory of scales (Vogt et al., 2014). To assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity related to stressful deployment experiences, we used the 17-item PTSD Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M; Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1993). Coefficient α was .97 in the current sample. All participants who had a score of at least 50 (n = 125, 19.5% of total sample) were identified as having probable PTSD (Tanielian & Jaycox, 2008). Depression symptom severity was assessed with an adapted version of the 7-item Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care (Beck, Steer, Ball, Ciervo, & Kabat, 1997). Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with anchors ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The α for the sample was .92. Using a commensurate cutoff to the BDI-PC’s score of 4 (Beck et al., 1997; Steer, Cavalieri, Leonard, & Beck, 1999), those who endorsed a 4 or greater on at least four of the seven items (n = 234, 36.6% of total sample) were identified as having probable depression. Alcohol abuse severity was assessed with the CAGE (Ewing, 1984), a 4-item questionnaire that assesses the presence of clinically significant alcohol use. Coefficient α was .80 in the current sample. Based on commonly-used criteria for classifying probable alcohol abuse (Buchsbaum, Buchanan, Centor, 309 Schnoll, & Lawton, 1991), those who had a minimum score of 2 (n = 100, 15.6% of total sample) were identified as having probable alcohol abuse. Drawing from items in the 2001 Veterans Health Study (Kaplan, 2004), participants were asked about use of nine categories of mental health and substance abuse care in the past 6 months: (a) outpatient mental health care, (b) inpatient mental health care, (c) emergency room visit for mental health care, (d) inpatient care for alcohol abuse, (e) inpatient care for drug abuse, (f) outpatient care for alcohol abuse, (g) outpatient care for drug abuse, (h) methadone clinic visits, and (i) medications or prescriptions for mental health conditions. For the purposes of the present research, mental health and substance abuse treatment use was defined dichotomously (yes/no) and represented use of any of these types of care. A modified version of the 13-item Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (Crowne & Marlow, 1960; Reynolds, 1982) was used to measure the tendency to describe oneself in a socially desirable manner. Scores on this variable were computed as the number of item responses in the keyed direction based on a 5-point response format in which 1 = very false and 5 = very true. The coefficient α was .79 in the current sample. Data Analysis To adjust for the oversampling of women, we first computed sampling design weights that were based on population values provided by the DMDC and set equal to the reciprocal of the stratum sampling probability. We next computed nonresponse bias weights by performing a logistic regression on the full sample of potential participants with returned survey (0/1) as the dependent variable and DMDC variables representing age, gender, race, marital status, service component, military rank, and branch of service as independent variables. The reciprocal of the resulting estimate of the probability of returning the survey represented the nonresponse bias weight. A product of these two weights was applied in all analyses using the STATA 10.0 software program along with recognition of gender stratification in the survey design, to enhance the representativeness of study findings to the larger population. To document overall mental health beliefs, we calculated weighted mean scores for each of the five scales. We also calculated the weighted proportions of individuals who somewhat or strongly agreed, somewhat or strongly disagreed, or neither agreed nor disagreed with individual items and overall scales. Next, we ran a series of weighted linear regressions to examine differences between individuals who did and did not meet criteria for probable PTSD, depression, and alcohol abuse on mental health beliefs, accounting for social desirability. A final set of separate weighted logistic regressions examined associations between mental health belief measures and mental health service use among individuals who met probable criteria for these three conditions, accounting for social desirability and symptom severity. Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 310 Vogt, Fox, and Di Leone Results We first addressed the question of what mental health beliefs are most commonly reported by OEF/OIF veterans. Of the five mental health belief scales, Concerns about Stigma in the Workplace had the highest overall average mean (M = 23.74, SE = 0.42), followed by Negative Beliefs about Treatment Seeking (M = 21.78, SE = 0.41), Negative Beliefs about Mental Health Treatment (M = 20.34, SE = 0.34), Concerns about Stigma from Loved Ones (M = 19.30, SE = 0.44), and Negative Beliefs about Mental Illness (M = 18.56, SE = 0.34). Mean scores for all scales were significantly different from one another (ps < .05). Table 1 presents the results of both the scale- and item-level examination of responses on the five mental health belief scales. Overall, only 15.0% of participants were classified as generally agreeing that stigma from loved ones is a concern. Slightly more than half of the sample generally disagreed with these items, and about a third fell in the neither agree nor disagree category. At the item level, more than half of all participants indicated that they disagreed with seven of the eight items. Between a quarter and a third of participants, however, agreed that friends and family would feel uncomfortable around them, would think less of them, and would view them as weak if they had a mental health problem. Participants appeared to be more concerned about stigma in the workplace. Overall, one third of all participants were classified as generally agreeing that stigma in the workplace is a concern. An additional 41.2% fell within the neither agree nor disagree category, and about one quarter generally disagreed with these items. Item-level results revealed that more than half of participants agreed that their career options would be limited if others in the workplace knew they had a mental health problem and almost half agreed that their coworkers would think they were not capable of doing their jobs. Additional items in this scale were endorsed by about one third of the sample, with remaining participants about evenly split between rejecting items and indicating that they neither agreed nor disagreed with them. In general, participants did not strongly endorse negative stereotypes of mental illness. At the scale level, more than half of participants were classified as generally disagreeing with items on the scale. At the item level, however, more than a quarter of participants agreed that it would be difficult to maintain a normal relationship with someone with mental health problems and that people with mental health problems often use their problems as an excuse. In addition, between about a quarter and a third of participants indicated that their beliefs on these issues were either neutral or undecided. Although more than one third of the sample generally disagreed with items reflecting negative beliefs about mental health treatment, 50.0% of the sample was classified in the neither agree nor disagree category, suggesting that they may be neutral or undecided in their beliefs about mental health treatment. Item-level responses generally mirrored the scale level results, with the one exception of beliefs about the side effects of medications. More than one third of the sample indicated that medi- cations for mental health problems have too many negative side effects. Finally, for beliefs about treatment seeking, 40.0% was classified as generally disagreeing with these items and more than a third of participants responded in a manner that suggested that they were neutral or undecided in their beliefs. When looking at the individual items, the majority of participants disagreed with all but two of the items. More than half of the sample agreed that a problem would have to be very bad before they would seek treatment, and more than a third of the sample agreed that they would prefer to deal with a mental health problem on their own rather than seek mental health treatment. We next addressed how mental health beliefs differed based on mental health status. As indicated in Table 2, individuals with probable diagnoses of depression and PTSD, but not alcohol abuse, reported being more concerned about stigma from loved ones and in the workplace than those without these conditions. There were no significant differences between those with and without these probable mental health diagnoses on personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment, with one exception. Specifically, individuals with probable depression endorsed more negative beliefs about mental health treatment than those without this probable diagnosis. Our final analyses examined how mental health beliefs were associated with use of mental health and substance abuse treatment. For veterans with probable PTSD, only negative beliefs about treatment seeking was associated with lower likelihood of seeking care, F(3, 113) = 2.92, p = .037; OR = 0.88, SE = 0.04, p = .009. For veterans with probable depression, negative beliefs about mental illness, F(3, 219) = 7.30, p < .001; OR = 0.88, SE = 0.03, p < .001, negative beliefs about mental health treatment, F(3, 219) = 5.41, p = .001; OR = 0.90, SE = 0.04, p = .014, and negative beliefs about treatment seeking, F(3, 219) = 5.92, p < .001; OR = 0.88, SE = 0.03, p < .001 were all associated with lower likelihood of service use. For those with probable alcohol abuse, only negative beliefs about treatment seeking was associated with lower likelihood of service use, F(3, 98) = 4.21, p = .008; OR = 0.83, SE = 0.04, p = .001. No other significant results emerged. Discussion The current study produced a number of interesting findings that offer a more nuanced perspective on the role of mental health beliefs as a barrier to care for OEF/OIF veterans than has been available in prior research. Consistent with prior research, results revealed that OEF/OIF veterans endorse a variety of mental health beliefs that have the potential to serve as barriers to care. At the same time, findings revealed substantial variation in the nature of these beliefs, with concerns about stigma in the workplace and negative beliefs about treatment seeking most commonly reported. Although it is encouraging that negative beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment were less commonly reported than concerns about anticipated stigma from others, it is important to note that many participants who did not endorse negative beliefs did not explicitly reject these Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 311 Mental Health Beliefs Among OEF/OIF Veterans Table 1 Weighted Scale and Item Percentage Endorsements for Mental Health Belief Measures Scale/item Concerns about Stigma from Loved Ones If had a MH problem and family/friends knew about it, they would . . . think less of me see me as weak feel uncomfortable around me not want to be around me think I was faking be afraid I might be violent or dangerous think I couldn’t be trusted avoid talking to me Disagree Neither Agree 53.5 31.4 15.0 55.5 55.3 45.2 59.8 62.3 49.3 60.1 67.4 19.5 19.2 21.8 21.9 20.0 22.5 22.8 17.3 25.0 25.5 33.0 18.3 17.7 28.2 17.1 15.3 Concerns about Stigma in the Workplace If had a MH problem and people at work knew . . . they would think I was incapable of doing my job they would not want to be around me my career/job options would be limited they would feel uncomfortable around me a supervisor might give me less desirable work a supervisor might treat me unfairly they would think I was faking they would avoid talking to me 25.5 41.2 33.3 28.7 36.4 23.0 29.4 31.3 37.1 43.7 39.6 25.1 28.1 21.7 28.3 34.2 31.9 34.8 31.9 46.2 35.5 55.3 42.3 34.5 31.0 21.5 28.5 Negative Beliefs about Mental Illness People with MH problems cannot be counted on. People with MH problems use them as an excuse. Most people with MH problems are just faking their symptoms. I don’t feel comfortable around people with MH problems. It is difficult to have a normal relationship with a person with MH Problems. Most people with MH problems are violent or dangerous. People with MH problems require too much attention. People with MH problems can’t take care of themselves. 53.8 57.4 39.2 68.8 59.7 43.9 67.5 52.7 65.9 41.1 28.3 37.2 26.6 29.4 27.4 28.1 35.4 25.4 05.1 14.3 23.6 04.6 11.0 28.7 04.4 11.9 08.7 Negative Beliefs about MH Treatment Medications for MH problems are ineffective. MH treatment just makes things worse. MH providers don’t really care about their patients. MH treatment generally does not work. Therapy/counseling does not really help for MH problems. MH treatment often requires treatments people don’t want. Meds for MH problems have too many negative side effects. MH providers stereotype patients based on race, sex, etc. 42.5 44.4 57.9 63.5 52.6 58.1 36.9 18.7 42.7 50.0 37.6 31.6 25.5 39.0 35.8 42.5 45.3 41.0 07.5 18.0 10.5 11.0 07.4 06.1 20.6 36.0 16.3 Negative Beliefs about Treatment-Seeking I would think less of myself if I sought MH treatment. A problem would have to be really bad to seek MH care. Seeing a MH provider would make me feel weak. I would feel uneasy talking with a MH provider. I would prefer to deal with MH problems myself. Most MH problems can be handled without professional help. If I sought MH treatment, I would feel stupid for not handling the problem myself. I wouldn’t want to share personal information with a MH provider. 40.0 56.8 25.5 53.3 48.9 41.9 41.3 51.6 48.4 35.7 21.3 15.9 21.1 17.8 16.9 36.5 21.6 26.6 24.3 21.9 58.6 25.6 33.3 41.2 22.2 26.8 25.0 Note. N = 640. Percentages reported are weighted. Disagree = strongly disagree and agree; Agree = strongly agree and agree. Items are truncated. MH = mental health. Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 312 Vogt, Fox, and Di Leone Table 2 Weighted Regressions Examining Differences in Mental Health Beliefs based on Probable PTSD, Depression, and Alcohol Abuse Scale Concern about Stigma from Loved Ones Concern about Stigma in the Workplace Negative Beliefs about Mental Illness Negative Beliefs about MH Treatment Negative Beliefs about Treatment Seeking PTSD Depression Alcohol abuse n = 595 n = 601 n = 600 B SE t r B SE t r B SE t r 3.54 2.59 −1.68 1.76 −0.82 1.30 1.10 0.89 0.92 1.06 2.72* 2.35* −1.89 1.92 −0.77 .11 .10 .08 .08 .03 3.53 2.97 0.61 1.70 1.64 0.98 0.92 0.71 0.69 0.86 3.62* 3.21* 0.85 2.44* 1.91 .15 .13 .03 .10 .08 1.96 1.85 0.09 0.74 0.44 1.27 1.16 0.87 0.84 1.04 1.54 1.600 0.11 0.89 0.42 .06 .07 .00 .04 .02 Note. All regressions included social desirability in the model. PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; MH = mental health. * p < .05. beliefs either (i.e., they indicated that they neither agreed nor disagreed with items). To the extent that these neutral responses suggest that individuals are ambivalent regarding their beliefs, this group may be an ideal target for interventions aimed at correcting misperceptions about mental illness and mental health treatment. It is also possible, however, that neutral responses may mask more negative underlying beliefs for individuals who are sensitive to the fact that endorsing negative beliefs about mental illness and treatment is not socially desirable. Future research is needed to better understand the factors that contribute to this more neutral response style. Item-level analyses produced a number of results that suggest promising targets for intervention. For example, although beliefs about mental health treatment were generally positive, a substantial portion of respondents reported concerns about the side effects of psychotropic medications, which may serve as a key barrier to treatment. This finding is consistent with the broader literature suggesting that many veterans have misgivings about psychotropic medications (Zinzow, Britt, McFadden, Burnette, & Gillispie, 2012), and underscores the importance of providing attractive alternative treatment options. Another important direction for future research will be the investigation of condition-specific beliefs, as veterans may be more concerned about treatments for some disorders than others. Current findings also point to the need for greater education regarding when symptoms warrant treatment, as a majority of the OEF/OIF veterans reported that they would only seek treatment if problems were very bad. Without sufficient recognition of the benefit of early treatment seeking, many veterans who would benefit from treatment may only seek care when symptoms are so debilitating that they are more difficult to treat. As expected, findings revealed that individuals with probable mental health problems, at least those with PTSD and depression, were more likely to report negative mental health beliefs than those without these mental health problems. One explanation for this finding is that stigma may become more salient for individuals who experience mental health problems (GreenShortridge, Britt, & Castro, 2007), which may lead to greater concerns about stigma from others, as well as more negative appraisals of mental illness and mental health treatment. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the nature of this relationship. Findings also demonstrated that personal beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment, but not concerns about stigma from others, were related to mental health and substance abuse service use. Particularly noteworthy was the finding that negative beliefs about treatment seeking were related to lower likelihood of seeking care for all three mental health conditions, with one of the highest effect sizes observed in the study. Thus, not only are negative beliefs related to mental health treatmentseeking common, but they also appear to serve as a potential barrier to care for this population. In contrast, though concern about stigma in the workplace was most commonly reported by OEF/OIF veterans, they were not related to service use. It remains to be seen, however, whether this potential barrier to care would be associated with service use in a sample of current service members, for which mental health records are readily available to commanding officers and can be used to make career-related decisions. Overall, these results are consistent with our hypothesis that an individual’s own mental health beliefs are a more important barrier to care than concerns about stigma from others. This finding has important implications for intervention, as it suggests that efforts to target veterans’ own beliefs related to mental health issues may be more beneficial than interventions focused on addressing stigma from outside sources. Of course, this finding requires replication in a longitudinal study before it can be confirmed with greater certainty, as a key limitation of the current study was the cross-sectional design. Moreover, additional research is needed with even more representative samples, as it is possible that even with the application of nonresponse bias weights in this study, respondents may have differed from nonrespondents on other unmeasured variables. Given that the focus of the current study was limited to correlates of use of any mental health care, another direction for future research is to examine differential predictors of initiation of treatment and treatment retention. It is also important to recognize that many factors beyond mental health beliefs are likely Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Mental Health Beliefs Among OEF/OIF Veterans to influence service use, and future research should examine the contribution of mental health beliefs relative to other potential barriers to care. Ultimately, research that can pinpoint and address factors that impede service use is essential to ensure that all veterans who would benefit from treatment receive the care they both need and deserve. References 313 Olmsted, K. L. R., Brown, J. M., Vandermaas-Peeler, J. R., Tueller, S. J., Johnson, R. E., & Gibbs, D. A. (2011). Mental health and substance abuse treatment stigma among soldiers. Military Psychology, 23, 52–64. doi:10.1080/08995605.2011.534414 Pietrzak, R. H., Johnson, D. C., Goldstein, M. B., Malley, J. C., & Southwick, S. M. (2009). Perceived stigma and barriers to mental health care utilization among OEF-OIF veterans. Psychiatric Services, 60, 1118–1122. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.8.1118 Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., Ciervo, C. A., & Kabat, M. (1997). Use of the Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories for primary care with medical outpatients. Assessment, 4, 211–219. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journa1 of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125 doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:13.0.CO;2-I Brown, M. C., Creel, A. H., Engel, C. C., Herrell, R. K., & Hoge, C. W. (2011). Factors associated with interest in receiving help for mental health problems in combat veterans returning from deployment to Iraq. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 797–801. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31822fc9bf Rosen, C. S., Greenbaum, M. A., Fitt, J. E., Laffaye, C., Norris, V. A., & Kimerling, R. (2011). Stigma, help-seeking attitudes, and use of psychotherapy in veterans with diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 879–885. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182349ea5 Buchsbaum, D., Buchanan, R., Centor, R., Schnoll, S., & Lawton, M. (1991 ). Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Annals of Internal Medicine, 115, 774–777. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-10-774 Sayer, N. A., Friedemann-Sanchez, G., Spoont, M., Murdoch, M., Parker, L. E., Chiros, C., & Rosenheck, R. (2009). A qualitative study of determinants of PTSD treatment initiation in veterans. Psychiatry, 72, 238–255. doi:10.1521/psyc.2009.72.3.238 Corrigan, P. W. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59, 614–625. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.614 Corrigan, P. W., & Rüsch, N. (2002). Mental illness stereotypes and clinical care: Do people avoid treatment because of stigma? American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 6, 312–334. doi:10.1080/10973430208408441 Schell, T. L., & Marshall, G. N. (2008). Survey of individuals previously deployed for OEF/OIF. In T. Tanielian & L. H. Jaycox (Eds.), Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery (pp. 87–115). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Military Health Policy Research. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358 Stecker, T., Fortney, J., Hamilton, F., & Ajzen, I. (2007). An assessment of beliefs about mental health care among veterans who served in Iraq. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1358–1361. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.10.1358 Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. Elbogen, E. B., Wagner, H. R., Johnson, S. C., Kinneer, P., Kang, H., Vasterling, J. J., . . . Beckham, J. C. (2013). Are Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using mental health services? New data from a national random-sample survey. Psychiatric Services, 64, 134–141. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.004792011 Ewing, J. A. (1984). Detecting Alcoholism: The CAGE Questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252, 1905–1907. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025 Green-Shortridge, T. M., Britt, T. W., & Castro, C. A. (2007). The stigma of mental health problems in the military. Military Medicine, 172, 157–161. Hoge, C. W., Castro, C. A., Messer, S. C., McGurk, D., Cotting, D. I., & Koffman, R. L. (2004). Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 13–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040603 Kaplan, R. M. (2004). Achievements of the Veterans Health Study. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 27, 136–137. doi:10.1097/00004479200401000-00010 Kehle, S. M., Polusny, M. A., Murdoch, M., Erbes, C. R., Arbisi, P. A., Thuras, P., & Meis, L. A. (2010). Early mental health treatment-seeking among U.S. National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 33–40. doi:10.1002/jts.20480 Kim, P. Y., Britt, T. W., Klocko, R. P., Riviere, L. A., & Adler, A. B. (2011). Stigma, negative attitudes about treatment, and utilization of mental health care among soldiers. Military Psychology, 23, 65–81. doi:10.1080/08995605.2011.534415 Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Litz, B. T. (2009). The historic origins of military and veteran mental health stigma and the stress injury model as a means to reduce it. Psychiatric Analysis, 39, 789–794. doi:10.3928/00485713-20090728-05 Stecker, T., Fortney, J., Hamilton, F., Sherbourne, C. D., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Engagement in mental health treatment among veterans returning from Iraq. Patient Preference and Adherence, 4, 45–49. doi:10.2147/PPA.S7368 Steer, R. A., Cavalieri, T. A., Leonard, D. M., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Use of the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care to screen for major depression disorders. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 106–111. doi:10.1016/S01638343(98)00070-X Sudom, K., Zamorski, M., & Garber, B. (2012). Stigma and barriers to mental health care in deployed Canadian Forces personnel. Military Psychology, 24, 414–431. doi:10.1080/08995605.2012.697368 Tanielian, T., & Jaycox, L. H. (2008). Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Vogt, D. (2011). Mental health-related beliefs as a barrier to service use for military personnel and Veterans: Findings and recommendations for future research. Psychiatric Services, 62, 135–142. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.62.2.135 Vogt, D., Di Leone, B. A. L., Wang, J., Sayer, N. A., Pineles, S. L., & Litz, B. T. (2014).Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory (EASI): A tool for assessing beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment among military personnel and veterans. Psychological Services, 11, 105– 113. doi:10.1037/a0032780 Weathers, F., Litz, B., Herman, D., Huska, J., & Keane, T. M. (1993, October). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX. Zinzow, H. M., Britt, T. W., McFadden, A. C., Burnette, C. M., & Gillispie, S. (2012). Connecting active duty and returning veterans to mental health treatment: Interventions and treatment adaptations that may reduce barriers to care. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 741–753. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.002 Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI 10.1002/jts. Published on behalf of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 
Purchase answer to see full attachment