InstructionsIn order to prepare for this case study, you will need to review the section titled “From the Case File: The Investigation of the Washington, D.C., Beltway Snipers” in your textbook on pages 1–5. In your case study response, you will address the following:Illustrate the role and function of detectives in the Washington, D.C., Beltway Sniper case as they would have occurred in the political era, the reform era, and for the community problem-solving era.Explain the four stages of the reactive investigation process related to the Beltway Sniper case.In just about any criminal investigation, there are mental errors (i.e., confirmation bias, selective information processing, and overconfidence bias), and the Beltway Sniper case is no different. Determine how mental errors are evident in this case.In this unit, you learned the three potential problems with evidence in criminal investigations. What are the three problems with evidence in this case? Explain.Each section of your case study must be clearly labeled using the following section headings:Policing ErasReactive Investigation ProcessMental ErrorsProblemsYour case study must be at least two pages in length, not counting the cover page and reference page. The only source you need to cite for this case study is your textbook. APA guidelines for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed.

Chapters 26 through 29 present four mini-case studies on ERM and risk and each provided a slightly different risk scenario. The recorded presentations posed a question for each chapter. Please provide an answer to those questions in your discussion thread. For chapter 26: What might the projected risk portfolio include for Bim Consultants? For chapter 27: Are the listed HR-related risks the right ones to explore and evaluate in the risk workshop for Nerds Galore and should there be any others? For chapter 28: Legal counsel will not be participating in the BSC risk management program. Is this a problem and is this typical for companies in this situation? For chapter 29: Do you think the transformation described in the text will be successful with the current Akawini leadership? 250 words minimum for each questions

This assessment has two-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this assessment.PART I: DIAGNOSING ORGANIZATION-WIDE PERFORMANCE ISSUESRead the three documents included with this Assessment as follows:Read the entire The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement text and make detailed notes.Read the “Applying Process Tools & Frameworks to Improve Organizational Performance: A TOC Primer” document, as you read through The Goal text, to help you focus on fundamental concepts.Read the “Three-Questions Accounting” document after reading The Goal text.After reading and note taking, complete the following:Choose an organization with which you are very familiar with. It could be where you work now or have worked in the past. Provide some basic details about the organization. At minimum, the basic details should include: the industry and products/services the organization offers, the overall operational and financial health of the organization, and a qualitative or systems diagram summary of how the organization operates to fulfill its commitments to customers. (approximately 200 words)Note: If you have chosen a private organization you must disguise the names of the organization and the people associated with it.Choose a minimum of six specific passages from the book The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement that contain an essential idea or concept that you found compelling and that offer insights related to systemic problems in your organization. Provide these passages making sure to quote and use citations for each. Construct a well-reasoned argument for why you chose each passage and how each selected passage relates to your organization in terms of helping you diagnose organization-wide performance issues. Be specific and be sure to support your response with appropriate concepts from performance management and/or systems thinking. (approximately 400 words)Respond to the following questions. Remember to make specific reference to concepts from the documents and other relevant resources to support your reasoning.In your own organization what do you believe are the fundamental physical, policy, or market constraints that are preventing your organization from moving to the next level of performance? Be sure to clearly identify each primary constraint and provide a detailed argument and evidence for why you think each is a primary constraint to organizational performance. Be sure to support your response with appropriate concepts from performance management and/or systems thinking. ( 400 words).What do you believe are the root causes of these primary constraints? Why? Be sure to support your response with appropriate concepts from performance management and/or systems thinking. (approximately 200 words)PART II: DEVELOPING SOLUTIONS TO ORGANIZATION-WIDE PERFORMANCE ISSUESReview your responses to Part 1.Refer to all the three documents included with this Assessment, and to other relevant organizational-improvement knowledge as needed and complete the following.For each of the minimum of six specific passages from the book The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvementthat you chose in Part 1, provide an argument for how the passage helps you in developing potential solutions to organization-wide performance issues? What are potential solutions relative to the concepts you identified? Be specific. (approximately 400 words).Respond to the following prompts. Remember to make specific reference to concepts from the document resources and other relevant resources to support your reasoning.For each of the fundamental physical, policy, or market constraints that you identified as preventing your organization from moving to the next level of performance, provide a specific recommendation for how to elevate, support, and potentially eliminate the constraint. (approximately 400 words).Provide an overall argument as to how and why your recommendations address the root causes of the organization-wide performance issues you identified. (approximately 300 words).Using concepts from the Corbett document, “Three-Questions Accounting,” and associated resources related to metrics and TOC accounting measurements for each of your recommendations, show how the primary metrics of T, I, and OE would be affected and why the recommendations would make sense from a performance measurement perspective.