Fined Billions, but Still Admired and Handsomely RewardedJamie Dimon is the CEO and chairman of JPMorgan Chase. He has held both roles since 2005--that is, before, during, and after the financial crisis. Few executives on Wall Street are as respected and recognized, or as well compensated—for instance, in 2013 it was approximately $11.5 million; in 2014, $20 million; and in 2015, $27 million.In one sense, this is typical of total executive compensation in the finance industry. Mr. Dimon's straight salary is often $1.5 million, and the rest (more than 90 percent) is tied to some measure of firm performance, such as stock price and profitability.However, JPMorgan and others have come under considerable pressure for what the compensation package doesn't consider directly--ethics. During this same period, JPMorgan has settled legal claims in excess of $25 billion! A few notable examples include: $920 million for allowing traders to fraudulently overvalue investments and conceal losses; $1 billion related to securities fraud and concealment of losses in the "London Whale" trading fiasco (JPMorgan lost $6.2 billion apart from the fines); $13 billion in settlement of risky mortgages; and another $2 billion for not identifying the Madoff ponzi scheme and the losses it caused its own investors.To be fair, Dimon's low $11.5 million year was intended to reflect his role related to the London Whale debacle, but this bonus reduction took place only due to pressure from Congress (Dimon earned $23 million the year before). Defenders of Dimon, and the JPMorgan board of directors who granted the pay, say he deserves such rewards for negotiating smaller fines and for producing industry-leading profitability. JPMorgan had record profits in 2015.This scenario nevertheless raises an obvious question: Is JPMorgan's pay for performance really pay for profits without consideration of other activities that are costing it billions of dollars in penalties and fines? Dimon was CEO before, during, and since all of these billions in penalties were paid. He did not inherit the problems of a previous executive. And a corporate ethics monitoring group reported that since the financial crisis of 2008 "there appears to be no change in the frequency of the ethical issues facing the company which suggests different types of intervention are needed." The combination of these details leads some to argue that Dimon should be fired.What Would You Do?As you may know, the board of directors is ultimately responsible for the performance of the firm, its CEO, and all executives' compensation. With this in mind, assume JPMorgan replaced its entire board. You are now the chair, and Jamie Dimon is only the CEO. What would you recommend?1. Would you fire Mr. Dimon outright? Defend your choice.2. Your answer to #1 aside, what recommendations do you have for the CEO's compensation from here on? Explain.3. Details of the case aside, describe how you could be sure pay-for-performance for the CEO also includes performance related to ethical conduct.Important information and instructions:Read the ethical dilemma. Analyze and summarize the case. Choose one of the opinions listed after the case (or invent other options) that best describes your opinions associated with the case. Explain why you chose that opinion and provide research that may help support that opinion. Research the topic in preparation for completing this assignment. You may also use the text as a reference. Be sure to use APA for citing sources.Submission of all cases must be in APA format with at least 2 references other than the textbook

What kind of user training should be conducted to deal with the issue of noise. How do you strike a balance between being overwhelmed with false positives and the danger of ignoring true incidents?  What effects would false positives have on an organization?  Make sure to cite your sources.

4-MAT REVIEW SYSTEMThe 4-MAT REVIEW system is a way of responding to readings that requires the learner to interact with new ideas on several levels.Please start with a title page that has the title of the paper, student name, Liberty University, and our course, TRMA 800. You should then use the following format in preparing your 4-MAT REVIEWS:1.Summary:After listing author and chapter, summarize what you have read as if you were the author boiling down the book into 600 tight words.Demonstrate that you have read and internalized the assigned book by writing a concise summary.This section is not a commentary or listing of topics, but rather an insightful “précis” of the content. This section should be at least 600 words in length.2.Concrete responses:Get personally involved (vulnerable).In 600 words, relate a personal life experience that this book connected with in your own life.Relate your story in first person, describing action, quoting sentences you remember hearing or saying.In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable or case study.You will retain more information that is meaningful by making this critical, personal connection.What video memory began to roll?This is your chance to tell your story and make new ideas found in the book your own. This section should be at least 600 words in length.3.Reflection:What new questions pop up for you in response to what you have read?Keep a rough note sheet at hand, as you read.Begin with questions like, “What would I like further information on?” Where do I agree/not agree with the author?” or “What bothers me/excites me about this content?”This section should be at least 600 words in length.4. Application:How does the information in this book influence how you are going to continue your own personal and professional growth?What actions or changes are you going to make in your life as a result of your learning? Be specific in summarizing your action steps. This section should be at least 600 words in length.