Human Leadership Management Article Review Essays

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 29th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $40

Question Description

For every section presented, you are expected to read at least 2-4 related peer reviewed journal articles and write two article review essays (500 words each) related to your journal article readings. An example of a review essay is provided for your use as a “template”. It is important to provide a source citation for any information that is not the result of personal experience or research.

It is important that you follow the following format in writing your review essays (there is also an example located in Blackboard):

  • Identify the article you are reviewing with APA citation;
  • Describe the thesis of the article you are reviewing;
  • Provide evidence from the article to support your thesis description;
  • Provide your own thoughts and analysis on the thesis with external peer reviewed sources;
  • Keep quotations from the article to a minimum; and,
  • Make your essay about 500 words in length.

Section 2: Two article reviews about either A players/B players in the workforce and/or transformational leadership in regard to empowerment, motivation, productivity, or other relevant constructs.

Section 3: Two article reviews about Abileen Paradox and/or groupthink, or succession planning.

Section 4: Two articles about how absent leaders are no good, whether or not leadership is coachable, mentor and mentee relationships and their benefits, or effective project leadership.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Who Gets Power – and How They Hold on to It Thesis The thesis of the article is that traditional political power helps organizations become aligned with their realities, while other institutionalized forms of power buffer the organization from reality (Salancik & Pfeffer, 2011). Evidence Salancik and Pfeffer discuss the thesis in the opening of their article and go on explaining it. Power resolves around scarce and critical activities (Salancik & Pfeffer, 2011) and the strategic-contingencies theory corroborates this belief. The strategic-contingencies theory implies that whatever the critical problems of a company are then the power and influence over organizational decisions will be gained by the person or department most affected by the problems. As in the words of Salancik and Pfeffer “power facilitates the organization’s adaption to its environment- or its problems”. In the article a study conducted looked at different departments within a university to determine if those departments that brought in more resources that are critical, were more powerful than those that brought in fewer resources. After the 18-month study it was determined that yes, the departments that did bring in more of the critical resources had more power. Critical resource criteria are argued for by the most powerful departments, thus those departments are able to name “their functions as critical to the organization” (Salancik & Pfeffer, 2011) even when they might not be critical. Thoughts and Reflections Salancik and Pfeffer make good points regarding power. I agree with their views that “it is the environment that needs managing, not power.” They say this since different critical situations (either internal or external) can have an influence on power, which managers and leaders need to be aware of the “realities” of their environment and be able to change to deal with them (Salancik & Pfeffer, 2011). When the authors discuss the strategic contingencies theory, I like how they give an example of how lawsuits make way for the legal department handling the critical problems of the organization, which gives them status/power. In addition, how the head of the legal department might make it to the head of the company, just as if the critical problem was marketing them the marketing director would make it to the head of the company. This just goes to show how they believe how “power derives from activities rather than individuals” and how it “derives from the context of the situation” (Salancik & Pfeffer, 2011). This describes how power can be gained by the changing of critical problems within an organization. References Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (2011). Who Gets Power – and how They Hold on to It. In W. Natemeyer, & P. Hersey, Classics of Organizational Behavior (pp 415-432). Long Grove: Waveland Press. For every section presented, you are expected to read at least two related peer reviewed journal articles and write two article review essays (500 words each) related to your journal article readings. An example of a review essay is provided for your use as a “template”. It is important to provide a source citation for any information that is not the result of personal experience or research. It is important that you follow the following format in writing your review essays (there is also an example located in Blackboard): • • • • • • Identify the article you are reviewing with APA citation; Describe the thesis of the article you are reviewing; Provide evidence from the article to support your thesis description; Provide your own thoughts and analysis on the thesis with external peer reviewed sources; Keep quotations from the article to a minimum; and, Make your essay about 500 words in length. Section 2: Two article reviews about either A players/B players in the workforce and/or transformational leadership in regard to empowerment, motivation, productivity, or other relevant constructs. Section 3: Two article reviews about Abileen Paradox and/or groupthink, or succession planning. Section 4: Two articles about how absent leaders are no good, whether or not leadership is coachable, mentor and mentee relationships and their benefits, or effective project leadership. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

EngDuke1993
School: Boston College

At...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors