Healthcare 22

Anonymous
timer Asked: Mar 29th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $25

Question Description

Read instructions and rubric carefully:

Option #2: Individual Healthcare Rights

In a PowerPoint presentation, discuss the importance of patient rights and the responsibility of the provider and the organization to protect these rights. Envision that the presentation will be used as a training mechanism for employees. Research and examine the different rights that patients have and how the staff can work to safeguard these rights. Include a discussion of the new patients’ bill of rights and explain each of the following areas:

  • Patients’ right to access affordable health insurance,
  • Patients’ right to emergency care,
  • Employees’ right to sue employers, and
  • Patients’ right to accountability by health insurers.

Your PowerPoint presentation should meet the following requirements:

Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 2 folder.

Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions about the assignment.

Rubric

HCM345 Mod 2 CT

HCM345 Mod 2 CT

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Healthcare Ethics

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 120.0

Tutor Answer

TutorAR
School: Cornell University

Hi, Find attached the paper for your review.Let me know if you need anything edited or changed.Looking forward to working with you again in future.Thank you
Attached.

INDIVIDUAL
HEALTHCARE
RIGHTS
STUDENT’S NAME

PROFESSOR’S NAME
COURSE TITLE
DATE

IMPORTANCE OF PATIENT RIGHTS
• Patient rights are basic rule of conduct between medical caregivers and patients as
well as supporting people and institutions.
• Some of the rights include:
❖Right to information.
❖Right to non-discrimination
❖Right to emergency care.
❖Right to informed consent.

RESPONSIBILITY OF AGENCIES AND PROVIDERS
IN PROTECTING PATIENTS RIGHTS
• The hospital’s health care providers are responsible for informing the
patients of any conflict of interest their physician regarding their care.
• The providers are responsible to reply to questions about the patient’s
health status when the treatment is not adequately understood.

• The physicians are responsible to respect, be cautious, and timely
responsive to the client’s needs.

NEW PATIENTS’ BILL OF RIGHTS
• The new Patient’s Bill of Rights was creating in 2010 together with
Affordable Care Act.
• The bill of rights was designed to provide patient protection in handling
insuranc...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
awesome work thanks

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors