Case Studies from the Field

User Generated

fubfub78

Writing

Description

Please write a page of summary and critique based on the reading:

Attached 19 pages

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CHAPTER 4 Collecting History KEY TERMS collections preservation archives built environment National Register of Historic Places vernacular Gans-Huxtable debate wonder rooms/cabinets of curiosity Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) material culture Antiquities Act of 1906 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) repatriation accession and deaccession P: ROFESSIONALS WORKING IN museums, historic sites, libraries, archives, and his- toric preservation have to think about what to collect, preserve, or archive. While these terms can have multiple meanings, collections often refers to three-dimensional objects like those in museums, preservation refers to buildings, structures, and landscapes and archives refers to two-dimensional paper records. While at times we will reference these distinctions in this chapter, we will also talk about "collections' as a term that encom- passes all three kinds of items as we explore a common set of questions that public historians face as they seek to build and maintain a wide variety of collections. In this broader sense, collections can include textual documents, artifacts, and even landscapes, such as groves of trees or battlefields. As an example of how diverse collections can be consider the historic Reeder Citrus Ranch in Montclair, California. This site is most visible as a preserved historic house, but it is also an excellent representation of the small family-owned citrus ranches that dominated the inland regions of Southern California throughout the first half of the twentieth century. The collections that accompany the historic house include the outbuildings, farm equip ment, furniture, and extensive paper collection of business records and documents, as well as the family's personal effects, photographs, and period appliances. The grounds, historic trees, and orchard round out the collection. Collections management challenges include A57 BROS QEEDER BERSERIES Photograph 4.1. Historic Reeder Citrus Ranch, Montclair, California. Courtesy of the George C and Hazel H. Reeder Heritage Foundation preservation of the house, the furniture, the paper records, as well as historically correct and industry-standard care for the citrus trees in the orchard. The diversity of the collections at Reeder Citrus Ranch is not unusual for small historic homes that also struggle with meager operating budgets, small staff, and a heavy reliance on volunteers. Even though most of this chapter deals with large collections and major institutions, it is important to keep in mind that the majority of places where public historians work share much more in common with the historic Reeder Citrus Ranch than with large national museums. One of the fundamental realities of collecting is that it is impossible to hold on to every thing. Knowing that we cannot save every document, material object, structure, or landscape requires that we must make choices about what we keep and what we do not. Before an item is collected, preserved, or archived someone has to believe the item is worth saving. Someone has to determine that the item or the lives it represents is of historical importance Personal collections are a good place to start thinking about the decision-making process that goes into professional collecting. We all make decisions every day about what we will save, what we will toss, what we will collect, and what we no longer need. People who canno make these choices may be classified as having a mental disorder and are featured on the Learning Channel's reality television program Hoarding: Buried Alive How do we decide what photos to erase from our phones? Do we create a physical archive of letters, cards, and images, or is everything safe in a digital format? Do we keep evidence of our daily lives, or only the extraordinary moments? What would historians be able to discern about our lives based solely on the scraps and artifacts we have collected and saved over our lives? How accurately would it reflect our lives? Who will be able to access 58 A CHAPTER 4 that material a century from now? Where could interviews with family members, friends, neighbors, coworkers, or with ourselves fill in the gaps left by the material or digital record of ourselves? Carl Becker's 1931 American Historical Association Address, "Everyman His Own Historian," shows us that these questions are not new. Becker suggested that the skills that people use in their lives are the same skills as those of the historian. We all have imperfect memories. Becker asked his audience how they would ever remember how much coal they had delivered in the past to determine how much they would need in the future. Referencing scraps of paper, receipts, ledger books, and other forms of primary evidence, we can reconstruct a history of our own lives in ways that help us make meaning of the past in ways that are useful in the present. Certain assumptions drive what we save personally and what professionals and society in general deem historically valuable. Should institutions keep objects that represent the ordinary daily lives of individuals, or only the extraordinary achievements of our society as a whole? Are the lives of illiterate workers, children, or prisoners worthy of historical inquiry or do museums care more about the accomplishments of the rich and famous, the powerful and clite? If public historians have to choose what to collect and what will be lost to the dustbin of history, how are we to determine which is which? Debating What to Keep from the Past Debates about what deserves to be saved consume the field of historic preservation. Quite clearly it would be impossible, impractical, and even undesirable to preserve every old building or every aspect of the built environment (the man-made surroundings that serve human needs, including things like buildings, bridges, parks, cemeteries, and transportation infrastructure) just because it might be old. City planners and historic preservationists have to agree on clear criteria for what should be saved and what can be demolished to make room for new construction. But what is worth saving? The US federal government and many state governments have established criteria for having a property listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The property must be more than fifty years old and fit one or more of the following criteria: 1) associated with events that have made a significant con- tribution to the broad patterns of our history, or 2) associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or 3) embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack in- dividual distinction; or 4) have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Trends in historic preservation follow other trends in history. The National Register's criteria for listing properties gives preference to the work of a master architect or a build ing with high artistic value, and narrow interpretations of the definition of "significant in their two criteria have limited preservation efforts for vernacular, or ordinary, archi- tecture and landscapes in the past. Mansions associated with the rich and powerful stand for centuries, while sweatshops and tenements associated with the laboring classes are demolished for new development. COLLECTING HISTORY A 59 mission of New York of bias in their decisions to preserve only the homes of the rich and In 1975, urban sociologist Herbert J. Gans accused the Landmarks Preservation Com the creations of famous architects. Preserving only the structures that represent the elitin society, according to Gans, distorts the real past, exaggerates affluence and grandeur, and denigrates the present." Ada Louise Huxtable responded both as an architectural critic and as a member of the editorial board of the New York Times. She wrote that it was not fair to accuse the commission of elitism for preserving examples of great architecture and that the further that it was fine for private individuals to preserve whatever they liked, but as a public commission also preserved examples of what she called vernacular structures. Gans pushed effort funded by tax dollars, the New York Preservation Commission should deliberately represent all boroughs of New York equally and should not allow preservation decisions be made solely on the basis of experts who focus more on aesthetics than on representing Dolores Hayden, a scholar of public history, called this exchange the Gans-Hustable debate. In it Hayden identified even more significant questions neither Gans nor Hutable had recognized: "He did not explore the problems of preserving and interpreting ghemo locations or bitter memories, and she did not ask how to justify spending taxpayers' money without giving public access or interpretation." Do we only want to preserve parts of the past that we can celebrate as a community or as a nation? Or do we want to preserve and be forced to reconcile evidence of slavery, of racially restrictive laws or segregation, and of the misery of sweatshop labor? If resources are limited, should those making preservation decisions make choices to represent the most exemplary samples of great architecture, or preserve structures that represent a broad spectrum of the city's history? Should pieces of history be available to the public and interpreted for public knowledge, or is it acceptable to spend public money to preserve spaces that will never be accessible to the public? Whose interests should be served as we work to preserve evidence of the past? While there at no definitive answers to these questions, looking back on past practices can help us better understand how these questions have been answered over time, and how these questions might be answered in the future. From Private Collections to Public Display Public acces to historic structures preserved with public funds is a modern question, as bar torically there was no assumption that great examples of architecture, art, or material object should be accessible. The world's greatest collections, for example, now housed at finde museums and accesible to the public for free or for a relatively reasonable fee were ae there private collections. Before the fifteenth century, the word museum was used to describe group of objects more so than the buildings that housed and exhibited the collections as we know them today. Collections that started as private enterprises were housed in rooms called nets, which displayed "curiosities of the natural world, science, or sometimes relics of his Known in German as Wunderkammer, meaning wonder rooms or cabinets of curiosity, carly examples of display are considered the precursors to the modern museum. Rulers, tocrats, and members of the merchant class delighted their friends and demonstrated the mastery over the natural world through the display of their own private collections. 60 CHAPTER 4 Private collections, over time, have become absorbed into modern museums. In some cases, they provided the original basis for major institutions that now conserve and exhibit samples of their collections for public audiences. The British Museum in London, for example, started as the collection of Sir Hans Sloane and other notable collectors; the Chamber of Art and Curiosities in Austria at Ambras Castle was the collection of Ferdinand the II, archduke of Austria; and the Teylers Museum in Haarlem, Netherlands, was started by Pieter Teyler's private collection. Some current-day collections preserve the feel of these earlier collecting and display practices. The Museum Studies program at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, for example, as a part of their Mayborn Museum Complex, has an exhibit called Streckers Cabinets of Curiosities. John K. Strecker was a self-educated librarian and naturalist who developed his own collection and museum between 1903 and 1933. The collection became the property of Baylor University, where museum staff keeps the association and feel of the original collector by maintaining it in the style of early natural history museums where the purpose was for visual entertainment and amazement rather than for public education. Around the turn of the nineteenth century, private collections increasingly made way for more accessible collections of national treasures." Public access to collections and the development of modern museums to serve and educate the populace also coincided with de- liberate efforts to create self-consciously modern national identities. In some cases political leaders consolidated private collections of elite benefactors to create national museums. In other cases, new collections were developed, sometimes through archaeological excavations. It might be surprising how relatively recently we developed modern concepts of collect- ing, preserving, and exhibiting fragments of the past for public audiences, particularly con- sidering how common and widespread the practice is today. The remainder of this chapter considers three specific aspects of this modern trend toward public access by focusing on how collecting has become more systematic, representative, and ethical over time. Systematic Collecting The systematic retention and preservation of records is a very modern practice. The federal records of the United States came under the central control of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) only when this government entity was created through a congressional act in 1934. Before the creation of NARA, federal records were stored in nooks and crannies of government buildings with scanty indexing and no climate control or fire prevention. In the absence of a centralized system, decisions regarding which fed- eral records were worthy of preservation and which were trash were left to individuals who certainly had different opinions on the matter. In 1934, employees of the newly created NARA began surveying federal records across the country and transferring them to a cen- tral archive in Washington, DC. With new records being added continuously, the collec- tions have become so extensive that many items are now kept in more than forty regional facilities nationwide, depending on the nature of the records. Even though NARA has a comprehensive and systematic plan for preserving federal records, there are limits in terms of storage capacity, staffing to process new collections, and priorities in terms of the lasting historical value of records, as well as privacy issues that regulate what is preserved long term and what is accessible to researchers and to the public. COLLECTING HISTORY A 61
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hi, kindly find attached

Running head: CASE STUDY

1

Case Study
Student’s Name
Institution
Date

CASE STUDY

2

From the case studies, it is a collection of the history of the historical three different
historical sites. The author is trying to give an interpretive and inclusive history. A case study
was conducted on the Conner Prairie Interactive History Park, Manzanar National Historic site
and the remembrance of the 100th anniversary of the battle of the So...


Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags