reliance on formal authority or coercion has been excluded in some definitions of leadership. What are pros and ons of this view?
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
Reliance on formal authority or coercion should be the option of last resort.
1. When absolutely required, it tends to produce immediate results
2. Possibility of its existence sometimes acts as a motivation for subordinates to work
1. It may reduce efficiency on an average
2. People might not feel comfortable in approaching a leader who relies on coercion. Hence the leader may loose contact with his followers
Content will be erased after question is completed.
Enter the email address associated with your account, and we will email you a link to reset your password.
Forgot your password?