Description
I need a 4 page case Analysis on the paragraph below. This is a Human Resource Management class I need this in. I will upload the direction for the Analysis . It must be in APA format . Please follow the direction please do not copy other people work. Must cited information do whatever in the information I'm going to upload. It Must be did the same way before.
Case
Myrna, a waitress, complains to her boss that, Simon, a frequent patron of the restaurant, has been engaging in what she considers to be sexually harassing behavior. Myrna details Simon's activities to her boss, requests that Simon be asked to stop, and that she not be required to wait on him in the future. Myrna's boss, Stuart, the restaurant owner, says he will look into the matter. Not wishing to upset one of his best customers, Stuart puts the matter off for a few weeks, and when he eventually does get around to dealing with it, he tells Simon only that he should go a little easier on Myrna. Stuart does nothing about Myrna's request to be relieved of any obligation to wait on Simon.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Hello😇,I have completed working on your assignment. Let me know if you need any edits.
Running head: CASE ANALYSIS
1
Case Analysis
Name
Institutional Affiliation
CASE ANALYSIS
2
Introduction
Harassment, especially sexual and racial forms, of workers is a human resource
management concern and should be taken in a strict and proper manner. However, human
resource managers tend to struggle with situations when employees are harassed by fellow
workers and also by customers. Through the struggle, the human resource managers have to
weigh in on the major factors at hand, the impact of their decisions and also how to solve the
problem without destroying the image of both the company and those involved. This case study
evaluates the challenges facing employees in relations to sexual harassment and the role of
human resource management is handling these challenges.
Background of Case
Myrna is a waitress in a high-end restaurant. She allegedly suffers sexual harassment
from a customer, Simon. According to Myrna, Simon acts in a sexually suggestive manner and
she, therefore, reports the matter to her boss. She explains to her boss regarding the ordeals,
specifically providing details on what she detests in Simon’s actions. She also requests her boos
to tell Simon to stop and also give a directive that she neither waits on him nor serve him in the
future. However, the human resource manager is in a dilemma, since he does not want to upset a
highly-valued client. He fails to tell Simon, but a few weeks later, he only discusses with him on
going ease on Myrna. The boss does not relieve Myrna of her duties regarding waiting on Simon.
Analysis of the Case
In providing analysis regarding this case, legal perspectives should be taken into
consideration. Before the evaluation, it is imperative to point out the specifics of the case and the
issues surrounding the position of the company. First, this company is a private entity – a
CASE ANALYSIS
3
restaurant and therefore the management is only focused on how to please the customers. In
addition, the company’s focus is establishing a rapport with the clients and the management only
focuses on meeting clients’ demands at the expense of workers’ rights. There is no proper
documentation about the policies of the company regarding sexual harassment and therefore only
legal assessments remain valid.
In a legal sense, a major concept that should be addressed is the “Civil Rights Act of
1964”. This Act prohibits discrimination at the workplace based on factors such as race, color,
sex or religion. For this situation, discrimination based on sex is a problem that the human
resource manager has failed to address. Liability of the management regarding sexual harassment
cases is a major concern for many challenges facing employees (Flake, 2017). In many cases,
major issues have to be considered when addressing the liability of the manager of the company.
For this situation, third-party sexual harassment is at stake, where management is not involved in
the sexual predation of employees by either colleagues or clients (Vaughn, 2002). In third -party
liability, the management is assessed on whether it knows the situation or does not know
(Vaughn, 2002). The knowledge by management, therefore, puts them into questionable grounds.
In addressing th...