Case Analysis

User Generated

ZefWbl

Business Finance

Description

I need a 4 page case Analysis on the paragraph below. This is a Human Resource Management class I need this in. I will upload the direction for the Analysis . It must be in APA format . Please follow the direction please do not copy other people work. Must cited information do whatever in the information I'm going to upload. It Must be did the same way before.

Case

Myrna, a waitress, complains to her boss that, Simon, a frequent patron of the restaurant, has been engaging in what she considers to be sexually harassing behavior. Myrna details Simon's activities to her boss, requests that Simon be asked to stop, and that she not be required to wait on him in the future. Myrna's boss, Stuart, the restaurant owner, says he will look into the matter. Not wishing to upset one of his best customers, Stuart puts the matter off for a few weeks, and when he eventually does get around to dealing with it, he tells Simon only that he should go a little easier on Myrna. Stuart does nothing about Myrna's request to be relieved of any obligation to wait on Simon.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Case Answer Format and Tips The minimum page length for your submission is four pages for the analysis and management tips combined, and the submission may not exceed six pages. A oneinch margin on all sides is to be used, and double spacing should be used for all lines except where block quotes dictate otherwise per APA. I don't grade on volume, but I do grade on thoroughness. Examining a case from the plaintiff's perspective and then from the defendant's perspective can demonstrate your understanding of the issues and how the law applies based on assumptions from each side. I am not seeking and do not want a recount of the case presented. I am looking for you to demonstrate your understanding of the legal concepts by applying them to the information provided. Assumptions must be made due to the limited information given, but you should state your assumptions in the analysis. Using outside cases is a great way to bolster your analysis and must be done for each case being analyzed. By researching similar cases and incorporating them into your analysis, you provide substantial support for your arguments. When including outside cases, you need to provide a brief overview of the case as well as the ruling and tie it back to the case you are analyzing. If you have a harassment case, you should locate a couple of similar cases and report information from them. You would then state that based on those cases, you can conclude that this case would most likely result in a similar ruling and tell what that might be. You must use the actual cases and not articles written about cases. Westlaw in the University's online library databases is a great source for federal cases. For management tips, I'm look for you to provide a narrative of how you would deal with the issue presented and prevent similar issues in the future. You can use outside sources for advice on dealing with similar issues. Citing published sources gives credibility to your recommendations and is a requirement. This is not about your opinion but is about applying facts learned through your research. Postings to discussion board questions and lesson cases should use the following format and thoroughness: Analysis - present the legal arguments related to the question. This should be very thorough. Make sure to include the analysis elements listed below as well as citations for the legal concepts used. Management tips - provide management with advice on how to correct the current situation and/or how to prevent such a situation in the future. Well developed recommendations with specificity should be provided. References - at least two per answer other than your book. Wikipedia and my class notes are not acceptable references. Please refer to the APA Manual for assistance. A link to APA information may be found under Learning Resources. Please clearly label each section. Analysis Elements Is the organization private or public? If private employment, at will applies...unless there is an implied contact such as a policy, a company handbook, written agreement or verbal agreement (must provide witnesses/proof that it existed); if public then due process applies and the person has the right to appeal the decision What law or laws might apply (e.g., Civil Rights Act of 1866, ADA, FMLA, Torts, etc., -- in some cases more than one law will apply) Is there a minimum number of employees required by the law(s)? For Civil Rights Act it is least 15 employees for private employers Does a statute of limitations apply for this law or laws? For the Civil Rights act it is 180 days What type of discrimination is taking place? Intentional/Disparate treatment, mixed motive, or adverse impact-What is the evidence to support it? If evidence for more than one, which would be best to file under? Explain in detail using the burdens of proof analysis. What questions or information do you need to know to decide the case one way or another? Legal Concepts to Consider DISPARATE TREATMENT Prima facie case Legitimate reason/Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) for action/same actor defense/slap in the face qualifications defense; Pretext/bias comments/unequal treatment(Similarly situated; by same decision makerif not may not count); lying; pretext plus; significantly better qualifications; timing of adverse action DISPARATE IMPACT Adverse impact calculated by job; isolate practice Firm shows business necessity, job relatedness or manifest relationship A less discriminatory alternative does exist Mixed Motive Discriminatory motives played role in the decision however minor Employer must show would have made the same decision anyway absence the discriminatory element Charging party must them refute the evidence and show pretext; this may be shown by circumstantial evidence
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello😇,I have completed working on your assignment. Let me know if you need any edits.

Running head: CASE ANALYSIS

1

Case Analysis
Name
Institutional Affiliation

CASE ANALYSIS

2
Introduction

Harassment, especially sexual and racial forms, of workers is a human resource
management concern and should be taken in a strict and proper manner. However, human
resource managers tend to struggle with situations when employees are harassed by fellow
workers and also by customers. Through the struggle, the human resource managers have to
weigh in on the major factors at hand, the impact of their decisions and also how to solve the
problem without destroying the image of both the company and those involved. This case study
evaluates the challenges facing employees in relations to sexual harassment and the role of
human resource management is handling these challenges.
Background of Case
Myrna is a waitress in a high-end restaurant. She allegedly suffers sexual harassment
from a customer, Simon. According to Myrna, Simon acts in a sexually suggestive manner and
she, therefore, reports the matter to her boss. She explains to her boss regarding the ordeals,
specifically providing details on what she detests in Simon’s actions. She also requests her boos
to tell Simon to stop and also give a directive that she neither waits on him nor serve him in the
future. However, the human resource manager is in a dilemma, since he does not want to upset a
highly-valued client. He fails to tell Simon, but a few weeks later, he only discusses with him on
going ease on Myrna. The boss does not relieve Myrna of her duties regarding waiting on Simon.
Analysis of the Case
In providing analysis regarding this case, legal perspectives should be taken into
consideration. Before the evaluation, it is imperative to point out the specifics of the case and the
issues surrounding the position of the company. First, this company is a private entity – a

CASE ANALYSIS

3

restaurant and therefore the management is only focused on how to please the customers. In
addition, the company’s focus is establishing a rapport with the clients and the management only
focuses on meeting clients’ demands at the expense of workers’ rights. There is no proper
documentation about the policies of the company regarding sexual harassment and therefore only
legal assessments remain valid.
In a legal sense, a major concept that should be addressed is the “Civil Rights Act of
1964”. This Act prohibits discrimination at the workplace based on factors such as race, color,
sex or religion. For this situation, discrimination based on sex is a problem that the human
resource manager has failed to address. Liability of the management regarding sexual harassment
cases is a major concern for many challenges facing employees (Flake, 2017). In many cases,
major issues have to be considered when addressing the liability of the manager of the company.
For this situation, third-party sexual harassment is at stake, where management is not involved in
the sexual predation of employees by either colleagues or clients (Vaughn, 2002). In third -party
liability, the management is assessed on whether it knows the situation or does not know
(Vaughn, 2002). The knowledge by management, therefore, puts them into questionable grounds.
In addressing th...

Similar Content

Related Tags