Description
1.200-300 words each questions
2.Single spaced
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer

Attached.
Running head: 10 ANTHROPOLOGY QUESTIONS
10 Anthropology Questions
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
1
10 ANTHROPOLOGY QUESTIONS
2
1) Kathleen Deagan (1973, 1983) describes the archaeological and documentary record of
St. Augustine. Here, she is interested in culture contact, exchange, and synthesis,
whereby once separate peoples begin to merge on cultural, social, and biological levels.
What evidence does Deagan offer for the creolization and mestizaje processes of colonial
St. Augustine? Give specific examples of Deagan’s evidence and her interpretations for
these exchanges.
Documentary evidence showed that the occupants of the lot were Maria De la Cruz’s
descendants, a woman from India who had married a Spaniard and the following lot stayed a
Mestizo, Clemente Ylario. The information offered by the excavation of the lot, together with
the the information of the documentary, made it more comfortable constructing hypotheses
regarding the nature of the process of mestizaje, with implications of archeological that are
testable. The site demonstrated an admixture of Indian and Spanish material cultures. It was
mirrored strongly in the ceramic assemblage that comprised of aboriginal pottery, Spanish
Majolica, and English earthenware. At the site, the prevalent ceramic type was San Marcos,
and the only utilitarian ware available. It was easily reachable by occupants of St. Augustine
and Indian-made aware that individuals utilized as kitchen pottery and that could be cheap
and replaced easily as compared to the European utilitarian that is small in the site. Food
preparation technology is ceramics even though there were no identifiable cooking hearths.
“It was apparent from the soot-darkened pieces of San Marcos ware that this aboriginal
pottery was being used for cooking” (Deagan, 1973:62). St. Augustine dependent much on
meat and after Moore’s raids, the individuals could not do farming, as it was not very
successful. This way, Mestizo had an idea on procurement techniques and aboriginal
subsistence that would be mirrored on archeologically in greater parts of wild fruits than
domestic or imported foods. However, the interpretation is that provided with the structure of
interaction of 18th century in mestizo or Spanish family units across a prevalent maleoriented cultural milieu.
2) Using Dawdy’s discussion of “ethnic acculturation” and “hybridization” (2000:111) within
French contexts of Louisiana, how are “creole” spaces defined by her? What archaeological and
documentary evidence does she provide for her interpretations?
“Creole” is a native-born colonial. Creolization forms observed in New Orleans are
hybridization, ethnic assimilation, and transplantation. In the Duplessis house and Madame
John’s Legacy are the archeological records seen for material expressions of connected
identities (Dawdy, 2000:112). Madame John’s Legacy included a change from the wave of
old world settlers to the generation initially native-born. There is evidence of the basic
requirement for the first generation of immigrants where they would tend to replicate the Old
World in household, food preferences, and architecture. The evidence is seen in the Madame
Pascal levels with high dependence on French goods and almost lack of local materials.
Expectations of materials for the 2nd generation, or native creoles, could be New World
products integration into day-to-day life and openness to “foreign” and “native” materials,
ideas, and designs. The evidence for this is the de Lanzos generation, where there is a
significant amount of British pottery and American. There is a representation of the two
generational phases at the Duplessis house. The first reveals creolization acculturation, which
might be queer to Louisiana and other self-conscious creole communities, creole dominates
10 ANTHROPOLOGY QUESTIONS
3
an ethic of its own. The third difference of creolization...
