Description
Typically, when speaking of validity, qualitative researchers are referring to research that is credible and trustworthy, i.e., the extent to which one can have confidence in the study’s findings (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Generalizability, a marker of reliability, is typically not a main purpose of qualitative research because the researcher rarely selects a random sample with a goal to generalize to a population or to other settings and groups. Rather, a qualitative researcher’s goal is often to understand a unique event or a purposively selected group of individuals. Therefore, when speaking of reliability, qualitative researchers are typically referring to research that is consistent or dependable (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), i.e., the extent to which the findings of the study are consistent with the data that was collected.
References
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
For this Discussion, you will explain criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and consider the connection of such criteria to philosophical orientations. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing qualitative research.
With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 4
Post an explanation of two criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research designs. Next, explain how these criteria are tied to epistemological and ontological assumptions underlying philosophical orientations and the standards of your discipline. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in qualitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a qualitative approach.
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Read a selection of your classmates’ postings.
Explanation & Answer
Here you go! kindly find the attached. Thank you.
Running head: DISCUSSION QUERIES
Discussion Queries
Name of Student
Institution Affiliation
1
DISCUSSION QUERIES
2
Discussion Queries
Two Criteria
The two primary criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative study designs can be held
as relevance and conformability. Relevance as one of the criteria for reviewing the quality of
qualitative research designs entails the applicability of research in a current situation or
phenomena. According to Maxwell (2012), the relevance of the quality of qualitative study design
encompasses the facilitation of understanding of the phenomenon under study. This aspect
implies that for a qualitative study design to be regarded as of quality it ought to facilitate the
extensive comprehension of the variables or sample under research. Additionally, the relevance
criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative study designs is also conveyed in research
through implications associated with the type of qualitative study design employed. For example,
a qualitative research design that enriches positive implications such as in-depth analysis of
phenomena is regarded to promote a high quality of the qualitative study design. Lastly, the
relevance as a criterion for assessing the quality of qualitative study designs is depicted through
the capability of research to be applicable in other contexts. The relev...
Review
Review
