Here you go buddy
Peer-reviewed article outline
Section 1. (5 points) Summary (synopsis) paragraph, not copy of abstract.
a. What did the researchers study?
b. Main questions? What were they looking for?
c. Quick summary of main results.
Section 2. (5 points) Natural history, background info on organism. You can use other
sources to add to this part.
Section 3. (5 points) How did they study their question?
a. Field experiment?
b. Lab experiment?
c. Comparative study?
d. What did they measure? How did they measure it?
Section 4. (5 points) What results did they find?
Section 5. (6 points) Discussion: Significance of research, why is it important (or not)?
a. Would you fund this?
b. Validity of the methods? Did they set this up well enough to answer the questions
they were asking?
c. What else would you have done, would you change anything to make it better?
d. Were there any parts of the study that you didn’t understand or thought were
unnecessary (explain this.)
Section 6. (3 points) Future direction. What else should they look at next based on
results. Present some of your ideas with support from their findings
Running head: VENUS FLYTRAP DIONAEA
Venus flytrap Dionaea
15 Million Students Helped!
Sign up to view the full answer