Venus flytrap Dionaea Article Summary

Uneavmmyr

Writing

Question Description

You must write a summary about the research article. Please follow the rubric below.

The link to the article is:

https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271203/1-s2.0-S1360138517X00046/1-s2.0-S1360138517302807/main.pdf?x-amz-security-token=AgoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEHAaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJIMEYCIQD2SlDC3T92R%2Fppbc8axtQ8SC59IOIGElBSXsINvTCJDgIhAL%2BS1HVaGUXaOUJpMnjK8K0uydwfhOtku4OvQupzRRIaKtoDCDgQAhoMMDU5MDAzNTQ2ODY1IgxL3gNuDCZcrpTYhawqtwN%2FT0mBA3TGn5AK7SXKKkXvg0napLV%2BltHQQtUv6X0to53j7eZnYXkuM9NNPhfTIBLlUhxkHzOwFC%2FtqV4Jlc%2FkXbs%2F0yj9H2SlJFSRjTP0%2FKKwUJHAOABzxGQl%2BIwfJR1UtGUn0HLHpn7x2qqQCXXO0FvT32AqmcLI8bNmLxx0P76Fhd2O0nB6ATu4IdI3tlydBXrvjGULJf90WD9L75%2B9QG%2Fz2AFdPeGNA5J3wS9QrNCca6CVvGHlXcUgyMTiGKzqVQXceqD5qG2so8Wi3lsTnwV3N7K%2Bwp5%2Bhmc7Zg5Xw6ql3BIWQL5geJ8kCUDoT2edCJJnt75ayUqc2jWWuM%2FhyZtaW7bmC5o69DjHAJ7Ts3HOGV0CM%2BHly2MyOqY3XkQdjSSswny1sgITY69p7QalY5EQSN347MMSs9dTfQAlXHRyf4E7%2Fcg2fzcv%2F67j6pqAJh4HIVnsqEdgAGrh0Vg7NB4WPyv6VwH7asNTmkammy1XpDIQ7DhLcyjK6OK3p0%2FJWnBjnErn9T%2BEYj%2Fw86Q73l63JUFWNLdX%2BSgybMe6ovkIoe5tR7kH6h38wfV1Q8xbtizH%2BaAWMKSIquUFOrMBJG5ZhcM5KKyk6n1AvYuHKncbIbE6GXiZu9KjpsAcB5%2FUok%2BB%2BW3ZrSRsyWG0iAU4kyRgQ7Vy0bPvepnH7ca9F5t7DcCb1eQfICNvrtBk7nGuTC8H7ZSQxBXj2%2FuaIGHIHmQEJz9RiOQvz3nMN1iR6H1op6bgSyHmQaJKQakuJABu5A%2B%2FRmM33H3P9R8Yk7ZUHjHaaF9U5Muvr0SUSSLZFiX2mOY9vSnaZo0x4KZByujxC%2Fo%3D&AWSAccessKeyId=ASIAQ3PHCVTYSCV5HGLW&Expires=1554682727&Signature=YhkfhAAD60%2BuYOQJthqb8uTNNWM%3D&hash=8f81ccc9e08672b2cb0419e50f908234b403c3711d25d929ee0a86c3faf12f16&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S1360138517302807&tid=spdf-5d335145-5578-4306-bd7b-1419ef6bfc6a&sid=3c8e2741120d78451e5a55b519871f244045gxrqa&type=client

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Rubric for 1st Peer-reviewed article summary! Title page: Name, lab section, title of article, date of article Section 1. (5 points) Summary (synopsis) paragraph, not copy of abstract. a. What did the researchers study? b. Main questions? What were they looking for? c. Quick summary of main results. Section 2. (5 points) Natural history, background info on organism. You can use other sources to add to this part. Section 3. (5 points) How did they study their question? Field experiment? Lab experiment? Comparative study? What did they measure? How did they measure it? Section 4. (5 points) What results did they find? You may copy appropriate key graph or figure or table from the paper here, cite it, and explain what it means; (one is good.) Section 5. (6 points) Discussion: Significance of research, why is it important (or not)? Elaborate on this section describing the importance of the results that were found. Would you fund this? Validity of the methods? Did they set this up well enough to answer the questions they were asking? What else would you have done, would you change anything to make it better? Were there any parts of the study that you didn’t understand or thought were unnecessary (explain this.) Section 6. (3 points) Future direction. What else should they look at next based on results. Present some of your ideas with support from their findings. Submit on Turn it in, and don’t copy anything directly from the paper. Everything is in your own words. A Turn it in score above 15% is unacceptable. Citation (or Reference) at the end. (1 point) Author(s) Last name, First name or initial if multiple authors, in the order they appear in the original paper, year of publication, title of article, Journal name, volume, pages. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Here you go buddy

Peer-reviewed article outline
I.

II.
III.

IV.
V.

VI.
VII.

Section 1. (5 points) Summary (synopsis) paragraph, not copy of abstract.
a. What did the researchers study?
b. Main questions? What were they looking for?
c. Quick summary of main results.
Section 2. (5 points) Natural history, background info on organism. You can use other
sources to add to this part.
Section 3. (5 points) How did they study their question?
a. Field experiment?
b. Lab experiment?
c. Comparative study?
d. What did they measure? How did they measure it?
Section 4. (5 points) What results did they find?
Section 5. (6 points) Discussion: Significance of research, why is it important (or not)?
a. Would you fund this?
b. Validity of the methods? Did they set this up well enough to answer the questions
they were asking?
c. What else would you have done, would you change anything to make it better?
d. Were there any parts of the study that you didn’t understand or thought were
unnecessary (explain this.)
Section 6. (3 points) Future direction. What else should they look at next based on
results. Present some of your ideas with support from their findings
Reference


Running head: VENUS FLYTRAP DIONAEA

Venus flytrap Dionaea
Student’s name
Lab section
Title ...

Qe_Fpuebqvatre (12962)
Duke University

Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4