1. Analyze the production photo from Apollo in your textbook on the top of page 148. According to director Nancy Keystone, who was the scene designer for Part 2 of Apollo at Portland Center Stage in 2009, the use of boxes on stage was central and symbolic to the metaphor and action she created on stage. What did the symbolism of 200 file boxes represent and how did she use the metaphor to inform and engage her actors and shape her space? Support your response with specific examples from the text.2. How can lighting affect the mood of a production? Support your response with specific examples.3. Discuss the importance of the protagonist/antagonist relationship in drama. Support your response with specific examples from one of the plays we have read thus far.4. Discuss how costume design communicates the progression of character of the Lord of the Underworld. The costume design for this character can be found in the production photo from Eurydice on page 182 in your textbook. Support your response with specific examples.5. As an actor, what kind of challenges might the long stories from Joe Turner’s Come and Gone present? What do we learn about the characters from these long stories? How do they relate to the events of the play and the play’s meaning? Support your response with specific examples from the play.

You have been practicing counseling skills either on a volunteer or on yourself throughout this course. This paper is an opportunity to reflect on everything you learned. It is also an opportunity to examine yourself as a potential counselor. You may write in the first-person perspective in this assignment.Write a 500-750-word paper addressing the following:What is the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor? Were there any skills that surprised you as you worked through the course? What are your strengths as a potential counselor? These could be attending or communication skills, attitudes or behaviors that will be an asset in the counseling role.What skills do you think will be most difficult for you? What might be your handicaps as a counselor?What are some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience? Review your text regarding consultant-counselor and the additional reading on the topic. Explain the role of consultant-counselor. Do you see yourself acting in this role? Why or why not? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.This assignment meets the following CACREP Standard: 2.F.5.c. Theories, models, and strategies for understanding and practicing consultation.RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00%70.0 %Content 20.0 %Counseling SkillsDiscussion of the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor and any skills that surprised you is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor and any skills that surprised you is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor and any skills that surprised you is accurate and complete.Discussion of the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor and any skills that surprised you is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the most significant information you learned about the skills required to be an effective counselor and any skills that surprised you is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.10.0 %Strengths as a Potential CounselorDiscussion of your strengths as a potential counselor is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of your strengths as a potential counselor is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of your strengths as a potential counselor is accurate and complete.Discussion of your strengths as a potential counselor is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of your strengths as a potential counselor is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.10.0 %Difficult Skills as a Potential CounselorDiscussion of the skills that you think will be most difficult for you and what might be your handicaps as a counselor is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the skills that you think will be most difficult for you and what might be your handicaps as a counselor is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the skills that you think will be most difficult for you and what might be your handicaps as a counselor is accurate and complete.Discussion of the skills that you think will be most difficult for you and what might be your handicaps as a counselor is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the skills that you think will be most difficult for you and what might be your handicaps as a counselor is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.20.0 %Preparing for PracticumDiscussion of some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience is accurate and complete.Discussion of some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of some specific actions you will take to prepare yourself for your future practicum experience is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.10.0 %Consultant-Counselor RoleDiscussion of the role of consultant-counselor and whether you see yourself acting in this role or not is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the role of consultant-counselor and whether you see yourself acting in this role or not is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the role of consultant-counselor and whether you see yourself acting in this role or not is accurate and complete.Discussion of the role of consultant-counselor and whether you see yourself acting in this role or not is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the role of consultant-counselor and whether you see yourself acting in this role or not is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

The Course Paper is due on Sunday of Week Seven. To help with the preparation of the final paper, complete the following and submit to your instructor for feedback.Then, pick one topic from the list below.They include: � Prader-Willi Syndrome� Narcolepsy� Korsakoff's Syndrome� Schizophrenia Spectrum� Huntington's Disease� Parkinson's Disease� Balint's Syndrome� Turner's Syndrome� Klinefelter's Syndrome� Tourette's SyndromeThe Week Three Paper Prep is due Sunday of Week Three. Your Week 3 Paper Prep Assignment should be a minimum of three pages and no more than five pages in length not counting the title page. It must include the following sections:� Title page in APA format (Times New Roman, 12 font only)The below areas are required subheadings that must be included within your Week 3 Assignment.� Topic: Select a topic of interest to you from the list above. This will contain the description of an area of interest from the course that you have not already discussed on the discussion boards (although you can pick a topic that another student has discussed). This description will contain 3 or 4 substantial and thorough paragraphs explaining key concepts of the topic area. This portion of your paper must be written in third person, Times New Roman, 12 font only.� Thesis: Develop your thesis statement. This will become the point or perspective that will drive your paper. Please see the writing tutorials in the library for information on how to develop a solid thesis. This portion of your paper must be written in third person, Times New Roman, 12 font only.� Annotated Bibliography: For this paper you need to do research in peer-reviewed journals or other journals that are considered to have reliable information (do not use sources from the secular press, i.e. Time, Newsweek, Parent's Today). In addition to the textbook, you need at least five articles from professional scholarly journals and not popular Internet sites (if you do find something on the World Wide Web, it must be authored and be a reliable source - when in doubt, ask your instructor if it is an acceptable source). In these journals, the research and information is either reviewed by an editorial team (such as for the Harvard Business Review) or a group of peers (such as in many journals you find through the APU online library). This portion of your paper can be written in first person, Times New Roman, 12 font only and research cannot be older than 5 years. The purpose of the Annotated Bibliography is to assist you in developing research analysis skills including: critical thinking, writing, and literature research skills. The Annotated Bibliography should include the following information for each source: Name of the article, including the complete bibliographic citation, using APA format. � Who? (author) � What was done? (for example, an experimental study investigating the interaction of short term memory and attention)� How? (was it done)� What were the findings? (identify the major ones) � Contributions? (new findings, applications, etc.) Each annotated bibliography should contain a minimum of 5-7 sentences per reference. This paper must be written through a biological lens. Meaning a discussion of the genetic/biological origin and treatments is required. Do not include non-biologically-based treatment methods such as counseling, therapy, support groups etc. Use this website to assist you with the correct APA format (NOT MLA!) and to see annotated bibliography examples and samples.