Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
What we call "contradictory evidence" assumes that it is absolute
truth. This is often not the case. Often enough, it is simply evidence
against an argument, which is very rarely going to persuade anyone to
simply bail on their ideals. There is an intellectual inertia
to never abandon wholesale the ideals and traditions inherent to one's
culture. In this way, people find it easier to incorporate contradictory
evidence into their existing belief system. This creates a hybrid
ideology. The best historical example is the Anglo Saxon acceptance of
the Christ figure; a warrior culture did not abandon their own culture,
but rather, they repurposed the Christ figure as a hero who endured
Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.