do you think an autobiographical or fictional by a slave is more persuasive than a biographical or fictional account by a white author. Do you believe the representation of slavery in tube visual arts are more compelling and convincing of the injustices of slavery. Use some examples of both audience and the content and nature of the work.identify the literary or art form in modern times.
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
Yes. A slave fictional representation is more persuasive as it creates awareness of oppression and at the same time, it arouses sympathy. Take for example pieces by Phillis Wheatley. Her work is based on her personal beliefs and ideas. And her pieces are more than just articles complying with laws and standards.
An example. A white author cannot create a perfect emotion from his readers when explaining hierophantic solar worship. Phillis Wheatley iterates that this are practices that she brought with her from Africa. She creates room for empathy for physically leaving her home behind
By making use of black artiste and actors visual arts makes it compelling to empathize on the injustices of slavery. For example, the movie, Tango starred by Jamie Foxx and 12 years a slave starred by Lupita Nyong'o
Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.