Can you help me with this Law-related question

Oct 26th, 2015
Price: $25 USD

Question description

Bernie lives in Richmond, VA. On February 1, he puts an ad in his local newspaper, advertising his 2006 Ford Fusion for sale for a $13,500 asking price. After waiting for a few weeks with no offers, on March 1, Vivian calls him and offers to purchase the vehicle for $12,000. 

Bernie is a bit disappointed by the lack of interest and by Vivian's low offer, but he realizes that there might not be much better offers waiting for him. So he invites Vivian to meet on March 5 to complete the negotiation and transaction.

When Vivian shows up at Bernie's house on March 10, she tells Bernie, after some negotiation, that she's willing to pay $12,500 for the car; but that she needs another three weeks to raise the money. Bernie agrees to wait, but only if Vivian will put down a deposit of $1,000. Vivian agrees and Bernie hastily drafts a one page agreement.

Because Bernie wants to keep his options open in case he gets a better offer, he puts the following language into the agreement:

Bernie agrees to sell his 2006 Ford Fusion to Vivian for $12,500 and Vivian agrees to purchase the same for such price. The transaction shall take place no later than March 31. 

In the event that the seller breaches this agreement, the seller must refund the purchaser's deposit, but the parties shall be limited to this remedy and only this remedy. 

In the event that the buyer breaches this agreement, the seller may keep the buyer's deposit, but the seller shall be limited to this remedy and only this remedy. Vivian reads and signs the agreement and gives Bernie a check for $1,000.

However, two weeks later, Vivian realizes that she's not going to come up with the $12,500 to pay for the car. So, on March 24, she calls Bernie to tell him that she's pulling out of the deal. Bernie says, "Fine, but I'm keeping the deposit in accordance with our agreement." Vivian sues for her $1,000 deposit back, claiming that there was no mutuality of consideration for the agreement and that the contract was therefore void.

Under applicable law, is Vivian correct or may Bernie keep the deposit?

Please write an essay/memo answering this question. An IRAC-style essay is appropriate and expected for this assignment. 

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: Cornell University

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Oct 29th, 2015
"Excellent job"
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1820 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors