Description
Rubric (15 points):
Submitted on time (3 points)
All components present and easily understood from first read (8 points)
Evidence of analysis (not a cut-and-paste from case) (6 points)
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running head: Branzburg
v. Hayes
BRANZBURG V. HAYES, 408 U.S. 665 (1972)
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
Branzburg v. Hayes
1
Branzburg v. Hayes
Facts
The petitioner, Branzburg, saw that the creation of hashish using marijuana and the court
summoned him to offer implications top the people involved. However, two petitioners,
Caldwell and Pappas took action and covered Black Panthers and later called by the grand jury
was expected to discuss the findings. Upon the arrival regarding the calling, the reporters denied
taking part in the set grand juries whereby they all claimed to have newsman privileges. Despite
some information and evidence revealing that the summoned reporters were directly involved...