Description
Programming for early childhood education students should be based on programming that is:
A. developmentally appropriate for typical students.
B. developmentally appropriate for all students.
C. developmentally appropriate for atypical students.
D. not developmentally appropriate
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
B. Developmentally appropriate for all student
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Nice! Really impressed with the quality.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
COMMON EVENTS IN LITERATURE 1, English homework help
So far in this unit, you have read about a young man taking his aunt to a concert, a wounded soldier recuperating from his ...
COMMON EVENTS IN LITERATURE 1, English homework help
So far in this unit, you have read about a young man taking his aunt to a concert, a wounded soldier recuperating from his injuries, an old woman making a trip into town to retrieve medicine for her grandson, and a young boy learning to stand up for himself on a trip to the grocery store. The cross-section of characters and experiences in these stories is typical of modern literature. How do you think the broadening of literature to address such "ordinary" or "common" characters and events affects readers? Does it make stories more or less appealing? Why? Cite specific examples from the text and your personal feelings or beliefs to illustrate the points in your response.
Career Institute of Florida Social Reasons for Corruption Discussion
What is corruption? and what are the sources of corruption? focus on social and political factors.
Make an elaborate ...
Career Institute of Florida Social Reasons for Corruption Discussion
What is corruption? and what are the sources of corruption? focus on social and political factors.
Make an elaborate explanation?.
The Police Hierarchy
Although many police agencies today are rethinking their organization and goals, many still function in a hierarchical man ...
The Police Hierarchy
Although many police agencies today are rethinking their organization and goals, many still function in a hierarchical manner. Write a 500-750 word paper that identifies the chain of command and examines how problems can arise within the organizational structure of a police agency. Support your argument with at least two outside references. Be sure to cite your resource(s). Only the body of the paper will count toward the word requirement. You may use your textbook and other outside sources as needed. APA format
Sophia Learning Should Working Moms Be Given Special Privilege Argumentative Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative res ...
Sophia Learning Should Working Moms Be Given Special Privilege Argumentative Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.Sample Touchstone 3A. Assignment GuidelinesDIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.1. Argumentative Thesis Statement❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?2. Argument Development❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?3. Research❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase techniques?❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources?❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?4. Reflection❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?B. ReflectionDIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)C. Rubric Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)Argument Development and SupportProvide a clear argument with sufficient support.The argument is thoroughly developed with highly relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material.The argument is well-developed with relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material.The argument is not fully developed; while it is supported by some relevant details, including rhetorical appeals and source material, some aspects of the argument are neglected.The argument is poorly developed with irrelevant details that frequently distract from the argument; there is little evidence of the use of rhetorical appeals and/or source material.The argument is not developed and/or the composition is not argumentative; details are irrelevant and distract from the argument.ResearchIncorporate sources through effective quotations, paraphrases, and summaries.Cites all outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources smoothly and effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Primarily cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Generally cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources adequately through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Cites outside sources, but most are cited improperly; incorporates sources through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary, but the integration is not smooth and/or the credibility of the sources is unclear.Does not cite sources, or citation is consistently inappropriate; does not reference sources and/or sources are not credible or appropriate.OrganizationExhibit competent organizational writing techniques.Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with relevant and engaging background information and an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with background information, an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes nearly all of the required components of an argumentative research paper; however, one component is missing.Includes most of the required components of an argumentative research paper, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument.Lacks several or all of the components of an argumentative research paper; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument.StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English.There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.D. RequirementsThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:Composition must be 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words).Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.Use a readable 12-point font.All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.Composition must be original and written for this assignment.Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.Include all of the assignment components in a single file.Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.Your annotated bibliography must be graded before your research essay draft will be accepted.
Factorial MANOVA Analysis, SPSS module 6 help
I want you to answer this one also with your original words I will also include the answers but please use your original t ...
Factorial MANOVA Analysis, SPSS module 6 help
I want you to answer this one also with your original words I will also include the answers but please use your original thoughts thank you. I have included the data set and the questions with the answers, but remember it must be your original words. I have included 3 sets of answers for you to look through, but please remember use your original words thank you
CNL 500 UOP Theories and Models of Counseling Essay
Assessment DescriptionRead the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.Select one of the ...
CNL 500 UOP Theories and Models of Counseling Essay
Assessment DescriptionRead the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.Select one of the following theories that you feel best applies to treating the client in the case study:CognitiveCognitive behavioralRational emotive behavior therapyReality therapyWrite a 1,000-1,500-word analysis of the case study using the theory you chose. Include the following in your analysis.What will be the goals of counseling and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish those goals?Describe the process of treatment using this theory. This should include a description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy.How does this theory address the social and cultural needs of the client? (Cite specific research findings)Describe the role of choice and decision making within the theory you chose regarding the efficacy of treatment. How can a counselor assist their client in using these concepts more effectively?How can a counselor implement cognitive processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship?Include at least six scholarly references beyond the textbook in your analysis.Each response to the assignment prompts should be addressed under a separate heading in your paper. Refer to "Headings" Class Resource for help in formatting the headings.
Similar Content
Seattle University Religion Storytelling of Jesus Question
Today's assignment is complete/incomplete (20 points). You will be composing at least three paragraphs.
(1) Compose...
write a research paper
write a research paper following the picture...
PSC101 Discussion Question CH4
Chapter 4 DiscussionNo unread replies.No replies.In which areas do you think people’s rights and liberties are at risk o...
HIST 1301 Tarrant County College District Social Effects of 1812 War Discussion
Essay Question. Choose ONE to answer. Minimum of 200 words.1. Discuss the social effects of the Revolution. In what areas ...
The red convertible
DIRECTIONS:*Type your answers directly into the submission box. Or you can create your answers in WORD, and then cut and...
HIST122 Events that Have Taken Place in The Past Extra Credit Reflections
Final Extra Credit ReflectionsFor those interested in extra credit, please share your overall thoughts and reflections for...
Choosing City Council Members In Texas K166
What is the Trade-Offs of At-Large Versus Single-Member District for Council The at large system involves a person being e...
Types Of Essays
Among the various types of essays discussed, I find persuasive essay as the most interesting type of essays. I find persua...
The Circle.edited
In his novel, ‘The Circle’, Dave Eggers describes the story of one of the main characters, Mae Holland. It is evident ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
We Were Eight Years in Power
by Ta-Nehisi Coates
Shattered - Inside Hillary Clintons Doomed Campaign
by Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen
Untamed
by Glennon Doyle
Beowulf
by Anonymous Anglo-Saxon poet
Where'd You Go Bernadette
by Maria Semple
The Aftermath
by Rhidian Brook
The Restless Wave
by John McCain
The Atlantis Gene
by S. A. Beck
How to Win Friends and Influence People
by Dale Carnegie
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
COMMON EVENTS IN LITERATURE 1, English homework help
So far in this unit, you have read about a young man taking his aunt to a concert, a wounded soldier recuperating from his ...
COMMON EVENTS IN LITERATURE 1, English homework help
So far in this unit, you have read about a young man taking his aunt to a concert, a wounded soldier recuperating from his injuries, an old woman making a trip into town to retrieve medicine for her grandson, and a young boy learning to stand up for himself on a trip to the grocery store. The cross-section of characters and experiences in these stories is typical of modern literature. How do you think the broadening of literature to address such "ordinary" or "common" characters and events affects readers? Does it make stories more or less appealing? Why? Cite specific examples from the text and your personal feelings or beliefs to illustrate the points in your response.
Career Institute of Florida Social Reasons for Corruption Discussion
What is corruption? and what are the sources of corruption? focus on social and political factors.
Make an elaborate ...
Career Institute of Florida Social Reasons for Corruption Discussion
What is corruption? and what are the sources of corruption? focus on social and political factors.
Make an elaborate explanation?.
The Police Hierarchy
Although many police agencies today are rethinking their organization and goals, many still function in a hierarchical man ...
The Police Hierarchy
Although many police agencies today are rethinking their organization and goals, many still function in a hierarchical manner. Write a 500-750 word paper that identifies the chain of command and examines how problems can arise within the organizational structure of a police agency. Support your argument with at least two outside references. Be sure to cite your resource(s). Only the body of the paper will count toward the word requirement. You may use your textbook and other outside sources as needed. APA format
Sophia Learning Should Working Moms Be Given Special Privilege Argumentative Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative res ...
Sophia Learning Should Working Moms Be Given Special Privilege Argumentative Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.Sample Touchstone 3A. Assignment GuidelinesDIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.1. Argumentative Thesis Statement❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?2. Argument Development❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?3. Research❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase techniques?❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources?❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?4. Reflection❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?B. ReflectionDIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)C. Rubric Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)Argument Development and SupportProvide a clear argument with sufficient support.The argument is thoroughly developed with highly relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material.The argument is well-developed with relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material.The argument is not fully developed; while it is supported by some relevant details, including rhetorical appeals and source material, some aspects of the argument are neglected.The argument is poorly developed with irrelevant details that frequently distract from the argument; there is little evidence of the use of rhetorical appeals and/or source material.The argument is not developed and/or the composition is not argumentative; details are irrelevant and distract from the argument.ResearchIncorporate sources through effective quotations, paraphrases, and summaries.Cites all outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources smoothly and effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Primarily cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Generally cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources adequately through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary.Cites outside sources, but most are cited improperly; incorporates sources through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary, but the integration is not smooth and/or the credibility of the sources is unclear.Does not cite sources, or citation is consistently inappropriate; does not reference sources and/or sources are not credible or appropriate.OrganizationExhibit competent organizational writing techniques.Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with relevant and engaging background information and an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with background information, an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes nearly all of the required components of an argumentative research paper; however, one component is missing.Includes most of the required components of an argumentative research paper, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument.Lacks several or all of the components of an argumentative research paper; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument.StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English.There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.D. RequirementsThe following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:Composition must be 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words).Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.Use a readable 12-point font.All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.Composition must be original and written for this assignment.Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.Include all of the assignment components in a single file.Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.Your annotated bibliography must be graded before your research essay draft will be accepted.
Factorial MANOVA Analysis, SPSS module 6 help
I want you to answer this one also with your original words I will also include the answers but please use your original t ...
Factorial MANOVA Analysis, SPSS module 6 help
I want you to answer this one also with your original words I will also include the answers but please use your original thoughts thank you. I have included the data set and the questions with the answers, but remember it must be your original words. I have included 3 sets of answers for you to look through, but please remember use your original words thank you
CNL 500 UOP Theories and Models of Counseling Essay
Assessment DescriptionRead the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.Select one of the ...
CNL 500 UOP Theories and Models of Counseling Essay
Assessment DescriptionRead the “Case Study Analysis” document and select one of the six case studies.Select one of the following theories that you feel best applies to treating the client in the case study:CognitiveCognitive behavioralRational emotive behavior therapyReality therapyWrite a 1,000-1,500-word analysis of the case study using the theory you chose. Include the following in your analysis.What will be the goals of counseling and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish those goals?Describe the process of treatment using this theory. This should include a description of the length of treatment, the role of the counselor, and the experience of the client as they work from beginning to termination of therapy.How does this theory address the social and cultural needs of the client? (Cite specific research findings)Describe the role of choice and decision making within the theory you chose regarding the efficacy of treatment. How can a counselor assist their client in using these concepts more effectively?How can a counselor implement cognitive processes in counseling without undue risk to the client or the counseling relationship?Include at least six scholarly references beyond the textbook in your analysis.Each response to the assignment prompts should be addressed under a separate heading in your paper. Refer to "Headings" Class Resource for help in formatting the headings.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents