Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

User Generated

zh929

Writing

Description

I need to write a for my paper to help focus for my upcoming persuasive essay. The Topic is Animal Testing. I attached 2 pictures of the requirements needed in the word document (Proposal and outline). Use the other document attached (Animal Testing 11). for the evidence and topic sentences.

Proposal: 200-300 Words, outline 1 page. MLA Format. 8th edition.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Al Tawqi 1 Abdulla Al Tawqi Professor Joaquin March 28, 2019 Introduction Animal testing involves the process of conducting a scientific experiment on live animals. With this process, animals are forced to undergo procedures that are believed painful, upsetting, and can cause permanent harm to animals such as death. Statistics show that approximately 25 million animals are used for commercial and scientific testing in the United States every year. Basically, animals are used to create medications, determine the harmfulness of these medical treatments, control the safety of products intended for human consumption, and other commercial and biomedical uses. On the other hand, others argue that this process is not only inhumane but also cruel. Indeed, animal testing is an inhumane and brutal process that subject animals to extreme cruelty. Annotated Bibliography Doke, Sonali K., and Shashikant C. Dhawale. "Alternatives to animal testing: A review." Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 23.3 (2015): 223-229. The number of animals utilized in experiments and research has grown significantly with the progress of research and development in medical technology. Typically, every year, loads of experimental animals are utilized across the world. The distress, suffering, and death subjected to these animals during animal testing experiments has been a controversial topic for years. In addition to the ethical concerns, there are also several disadvantages associated with animal testing such as time-consuming processes, the requirement of experts, the cost of actually Al Tawqi 2 undergoing these experiments. Researchers and animal rights activists have recommended several alternatives to animal Testing. The approach of 3Rs has been proposed to be used in a laboratory setting. The 3Rs are reduction, refinement, and replacement. The concept of reduction suggests the utilization of a minimum number of animals in such experiments. With replacement, it is recommended that animals be ‘replaced’ with substitute procedures whereas refinement involves researchers refining the animal facility to minimize distress and harm during scientific processes. Ferdowsian, Hope R., and Nancy Beck. "Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and research." PloS one 6.9 (2011): e24059. One of the most important efforts to study and assess the use of animals in tests is in the mid-20th century, in the article The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. The writers wrote this article in response to development in animal testing and medical research and the associated growth in the number of animals utilized. This article highlighted reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals utilized, models which were later termed as the 3 Rs. These models inspired scientists to work to minimize the number of animals experimented on to the minimum regarded essential, restrict the distress and suffering these animals experience as well as replacing the utilization of animals with other alternative methods that do not involve animals. Statistics show that over 100 million are used every year in experiments in the world. The 3 Rs acts as the foundation for current animal research rules. Jain, Manshu, Ritu Gilotra, and Jitendra Mital. "Global trends of animal ethics and scientific research." Journal of Medicinal Plants 5.2 (2017): 96-105. Al Tawqi 3 Human have benefited greatly from research and experiments encompassing animals. Typically, progress in several treatments like leukemia and diabetes has been made through the use of animals testing. Most scientists defend animal testing by citing the development made in the field of medicine. However, some of the general public including animal rights’ activists are against animal testing arguing that the process is inhumane to the animals. Animals used in experiments experience unbelievable pain. They are forced to feed, breath, are deprived of food and water, and sometimes are left with wounds and burns. Some studies cite that using animals in research is unnecessary because there are other alternatives such as non-animals approaches like computer modeling and tissue culture. Furthermore, using animals is unethical and immoral. Using live animals and allowing them to face all kinds of distress is unethical and researchers and scientists have a moral duty to the animals and the society. Joffe, Ari R., et al. "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America." BMC medical ethics 17.1 (2016): 17. Given the massive public funding of animal experimentation in today’s societies, it is predicted that the opinions against and for animal testing are established. The facts of normal ethical opinions and counterarguments for this controversial issue are not usually publicly deliberated, and it is likely that most individuals are not familiar with the details of the discussion. Although animal testing carries ethical questions regarding the welfare and safety of animals, it is proposed that such tests are conducted in a research setting. The ethical justification of animal testing is founded on ‘benefits arguments’ that states that this process benefits human considerably and therefore it is essential. Another justification is based on ‘traits of non-humananimals (NHA) assertions’ that argues that animals are not emotional, are property, and usually Al Tawqi 4 harm other animals. In other words, since the benefits of animal testing outweigh the costs, it is scientifically warranted to use animals in experiments that will eventually benefit humans. Knight, Andrew. "Weighing the costs and benefits of animal experiments." Eighth World Congress on Alternafives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Alternafives to Animal Experimentafion, Proceedings. 2011 Most legislation regulating animal experimentation order that the damages expected to be experienced by animals must be balanced against the benefits of the experiment. The key ethical model supporting animal testing regulation and guidelines is that the possible benefits of this research must exceed its predictable costs. Even though significant financial and human guarantee costs exist, the major costs are taken by the animals used in such experimentation. Furthermore, although experiment like these may be focused at producing benefits for animals or the environment, the huge majority is focused on human benefits such as the progression of knowledge, the development of medications and cosmetics, and the usage in educational settings. Wide studies in animal experiments show that animal testing leads in medical advances. Scientists can use animals to test the benefits and side effects of a particular medication that is intended to treat human diseases. Al Tawqi 5 Work Cited Doke, Sonali K., and Shashikant C. Dhawale. "Alternatives to animal testing: A review." Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 23.3 (2015): 223-229. Ferdowsian, Hope R., and Nancy Beck. "Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and research." PloS one 6.9 (2011): e24059. Jain, Manshu, Ritu Gilotra, and Jitendra Mital. "Global trends of animal ethics and scientific research." Journal of Medicinal Plants 5.2 (2017): 96-105. Joffe, Ari R., et al. "The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America." BMC medical ethics 17.1 (2016): 17. Knight, Andrew. "Weighing the costs and benefits of animal experiments." Eighth World Congress on Alternafives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Alternafives to Animal Experimentafion, Proceedings. 2011 Al Tawqi 6
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, review the attached document and contact me in case you need any changes. Otherwise, good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know. Always invite me to answer your questions.


Surname 1
Name
Instructor’s name
Course code
Date
Proposal and Outline
Proposal
Animal testing involves conducting scientific experiment on live animals. The statistical view
indicate that in excess of 25 million animals are used for commercial and scientific purposes in
the US. In most cases, animals undergo painful and degrading processes, with little
considerations for ethical grounds. On the other hand, animal testing has been credited for its
contribution to medical advancements and other improvements to human welfare. When one
looks at both sides of the argument, there is compelling evidence and reasons on why each party
takes a specific position on the issue. However, one needs to look at one integral issue which
holds key to breaking the observable tension and impulse on the two positions, developing
alternatives to animal testing.
The ethics of scien...


Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags