Week 7 Cisco Corporate & Business Level Strategy Case Study

Anonymous
timer Asked: Apr 16th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $15

Question Description

The Value of Diversification

Diversification presents businesses with the opportunity to enter new markets, expand product or service lines, and, if done effectively, broaden the scope or reach of a business. The process of diversification requires the development of effective strategies to be implemented at the business unit level and/or at the corporate level. For this Discussion, you will utilize a specific case to compare these two strategy options. Within this, you will examine the role, challenges, and potential benefits of diversification strategies within an organization.

To prepare for this Discussion, review the “Cisco Systems: Growth Through Diversification and Acquisition” case found on pages 108–109 of Dyer, Godfrey, Jensen, and Bryce (2016) and consider how companies can utilize diversification strategies to create organizational value and competitive advantage. You may also want to review the video titled “The Upside of Concentrating Risk,” as well as the cases provided in this week’s Optional Resources for further research on diversification initiatives and business strategy effectiveness.

By Day 3

Post a comparison of corporate strategy versus business-unit-level strategy. In your comparison, address the following:

  • How does corporate strategy differentiate from a business-unit-level strategy, including advantages and disadvantages of each?
  • Which approach for diversification (related-constrained or related-linked) has the strongest return on investment in this case study? Explain, including at least one supportive example.
  • In your opinion as an independent scholar, why does diversification most often fail to add value? Explain with at least one supportive example.
  • What factors should executives consider when making a decision to diversify through green field entry over making an acquisition? Explain.

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source.

Refer to the Week 7 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

By Day 5

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

  • Compare your initial posting with that of your colleague, including insights on why diversification can fail to add value.
  • Identify in what ways you agree or disagree with your colleague on the value of diversification and how this can enhance or expand innovation or competitive advantage.
  • Provide a suggestion for an additional value diversification to better support your colleague’s posting, including a rationale for your suggestion.

Please note that, for each response, you must include a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference.


Dyer, J. H., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and tools for creating real world strategy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Tutor Answer

Lessermaster
School: Rice University

Attached.

Running Head: BUSINESS STRATEGY

1

Corporate Level Strategy and Business Level Strategy: Cisco Case Study
Name
Course
Tutor
Date

BUSINESS STRATEGY

2

The corporate level strategy focuses on how resources are deployed among the different
types of businesses within which organizations compete. The strategy is primarily concerned
with determining the type of business which is viable and profitable by providing a broader view
of the organization’s competencies and differentiators to create value across its business and
markets gaining a competitive advantage over other organizations operating in the same industry
(Dyer et al. 2016). The strategy is advantageous in that it allows corporate leaders to uncover
how to...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors