I need help with a law assignment

Nov 7th, 2015
Price: $25 USD

Question description

"Windy City Watches" is a men's jewelry store that is located in downtown Chicago, IL. Fortunately, business is booming and Wally, the proprietor, needs to order a large quantity of Rolek watches (which he sells for $50 apiece) because his stock is almost depleted. Therefore, he calls Randy Rolek, a wholesaler located in Milwaukee, WI, who supplies retailers with Roleks. 

Wally and Randy discuss terms on the phone for a while. Eventually, Wally offers to purchase 100 watches for a total price of $2,500. Randy replies "Okay, you've got yourself a deal. Listen, I'm going to send you an order form to sign. Send it back to me, and I'll ship the watches." 

Randy then faxes Wally a form which says: "I, Wally, agree to purchase Rolek watches from Randy for $25 per watch." Wally signs the form and mails it back to Randy. Randy receives the signed form two days later. 

The following week, Randy sends Wally a package with 50 watches and a note that says: 

"Hi Wally: Here are 50 of the watches we discussed last week. I'll have the remaining 50 to you within a few days. In the meantime, I'm enclosing my bill. [signed] Randy" 

Enclosed in the package is a bill for $2,500 for 100 watches. Unfortunately, by this time, Wally had changed his mind about buying the watches, as he figured that he'd rather sell Rolexes. He therefore called up Randy and said: 

"Listen, Randy, I'm sorry, but I changed my mind about the whole business. I'll send you back your watches and I'll even reimburse your shipping expenses, but I can't pay for the watches." 

Randy sues Wally to enforce the original agreement. Wally argues that under the UCC Statute of Frauds, this agreement is unenforceable because it was never put into writing. Randy argues that: 

1) Wally signed the order form; so the contract was in writing; and 

2) In any case, the UCC Statute of Frauds was satisfied by performance when Randy sent over the watches. 

Who is correct? Explain, in 3-5 paragraphs, relying solely on the UCC Statute of Frauds and the materials about the Statute of Frauds you learned during your NPC Contracts course. Case law is not necessary for this assignment. An IRAC-based essay is also not necessary.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: Cornell University

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Nov 12th, 2015
"AMAZING as always!"
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1820 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors