I need help with a law assignment

Nov 7th, 2015
Sigchi4life
Category:
Law
Price: $25 USD

Question description

"Windy City Watches" is a men's jewelry store that is located in downtown Chicago, IL. Fortunately, business is booming and Wally, the proprietor, needs to order a large quantity of Rolek watches (which he sells for $50 apiece) because his stock is almost depleted. Therefore, he calls Randy Rolek, a wholesaler located in Milwaukee, WI, who supplies retailers with Roleks. 

Wally and Randy discuss terms on the phone for a while. Eventually, Wally offers to purchase 100 watches for a total price of $2,500. Randy replies "Okay, you've got yourself a deal. Listen, I'm going to send you an order form to sign. Send it back to me, and I'll ship the watches." 

Randy then faxes Wally a form which says: "I, Wally, agree to purchase Rolek watches from Randy for $25 per watch." Wally signs the form and mails it back to Randy. Randy receives the signed form two days later. 

The following week, Randy sends Wally a package with 50 watches and a note that says: 

"Hi Wally: Here are 50 of the watches we discussed last week. I'll have the remaining 50 to you within a few days. In the meantime, I'm enclosing my bill. [signed] Randy" 

Enclosed in the package is a bill for $2,500 for 100 watches. Unfortunately, by this time, Wally had changed his mind about buying the watches, as he figured that he'd rather sell Rolexes. He therefore called up Randy and said: 

"Listen, Randy, I'm sorry, but I changed my mind about the whole business. I'll send you back your watches and I'll even reimburse your shipping expenses, but I can't pay for the watches." 

Randy sues Wally to enforce the original agreement. Wally argues that under the UCC Statute of Frauds, this agreement is unenforceable because it was never put into writing. Randy argues that: 

1) Wally signed the order form; so the contract was in writing; and 

2) In any case, the UCC Statute of Frauds was satisfied by performance when Randy sent over the watches. 

Who is correct? Explain, in 3-5 paragraphs, relying solely on the UCC Statute of Frauds and the materials about the Statute of Frauds you learned during your NPC Contracts course. Case law is not necessary for this assignment. An IRAC-based essay is also not necessary.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: Cornell University
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
darnay
Dec 3rd, 2016
" The best tutor out there!!!! "
dontuwannaknow
Nov 24th, 2016
" Excellent work as always thanks so much "
SjSurvivor143
Nov 10th, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
ddg82
Nov 1st, 2016
" Thanks, good work "
tinytim47
Oct 19th, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
jestin7
Oct 10th, 2016
" This tutor is great! "
mixedballz
Oct 5th, 2016
" excellent work as always thanks for the help "
lilmoe415
Sep 26th, 2016
" Thank you, Thank you, for top quality work, this is your guy!! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1828 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors