PART ONE (300 or 300+ words)
Pick one of the following three topics and write a 300-word essay on the topic you
select.
Topics to choose from:
a.
Explain New Power and its implication to the practice of leadership
b.
Explain why teams are the most common way that works gets done and its
implication to the practice of leadership
c.
Explain Contingency/Situational Leadership and select a leadership style
(chapter 5) that you believe would be the most effective – defend your choice
Hints:
In particular, I am looking for...
An explanation of the concept(s) using material we have covered in class or drawn from
the text; feel free to use additional material and/or research (with references to sources
as needed, cites, no plagiarism!)
Your insight into the topic backed by a logical explanation – examples, data, reflection
Points will be deducted for essays under 300 words. There is no maximum length.
PART TWO (100-150 words)
Please read the following case (A GOOD TEAM PLAYER) and answer the three
questions which follow it.
A GOOD TEAM PLAYER
Having done well in his job as a staff accountant in the accounts payable department of
a major industrial firm for several years since his college graduation, Steven was
relaxed as he entered the employee lounge to attend the late-afternoon welcoming
reception for his new supervisor, Kristin.
At the reception, Kristen circulated through the room, introducing herself to her new
direct reports and asking each of them if they had suggestions that would help make the
accounts payable department a better place to work. When she approached Steven, he
told her about something that had been on his mind lately: that people seemed to gain
promotions and be given paid overtime opportunities based on who liked them, and not
on the quality of their work. Kristen politely thanked him for his comment and noted
that she would look into it.
Upon his arrival at work the next day, Kristen called Steven into her office. As he sat
down, Kristen said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not good
team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe that there are people in this
office who are not acting in the best interests of this company. I want you to tell me the
names of the managers you were referring to, or I’ve got to think that you’re part of the
problems around here.”
Stunned by both the tone and content of her statement, Steven tried to think of a way to
respond.
Place yourself in the position of Steven and respond to the following:
1. Describe the ethical dilemma that Steven is facing and identify the relevant
stakeholders.
2. Analyze Steven’s ethical dilemma from the perspective of each of the following
decision-making approaches:
Consequentialist:
Deontological:
Virtue Ethics:
3. What should Steven do? Justify your answer based on your analysis in Question 2.
Introduction to Leadership
Fourth Edition
2
To Madison and Isla
3
Introduction to Leadership
Concepts and Practice
Fourth Edition
Peter G. Northouse
Western Michigan University
4
FOR INFORMATION:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
E-mail: order@sagepub.com
SAGE Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver’s Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
United Kingdom
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
India
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
3 Church Street
#10-04 Samsung Hub
Singapore 049483
Copyright © 2018 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
5
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in
any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America
ISBN: 978-1-5063-3008-2
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
Acquisitions Editor: Maggie Stanley
Development Editor: Lauren Holmes
Editorial Assistant: Neda Dallal
eLearning Editor: Katie Ancheta
Production Editor: Libby Larson
Copy Editor: Melinda Masson
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Proofreader: Theresa Kay
Indexer: Wendy Allex
Cover Designer: Gail Buschman
Marketing Manager: Ashlee Blunk
6
Brief Contents
Preface
About the Author
1. Understanding Leadership
2. Recognizing Your Traits
3. Engaging Strengths
4. Understanding Philosophy and Styles
5. Attending to Tasks and Relationships
6. Developing Leadership Skills
7. Creating a Vision
8. Establishing a Constructive Climate
9. Embracing Diversity and Inclusion
10. Listening to Out-Group Members
11. Managing Conflict
12. Addressing Ethics in Leadership
13. Overcoming Obstacles
Glossary
Index
7
Detailed Contents
Preface
About the Author
1. Understanding Leadership
Introduction
Leadership Explained
“Leadership Is a Trait”
“Leadership Is an Ability”
“Leadership Is a Skill”
“Leadership Is a Behavior”
“Leadership Is a Relationship”
“Leadership Is an Influence Process”
Global Leadership Attributes
The Dark Side of Leadership
Leadership Snapshot: Indra Nooyi
Summary
Application
1.1 Case Study
1.2 Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire
1.3 Observational Exercise
1.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
2. Recognizing Your Traits
Introduction
Leadership Traits Explained
Intelligence
Confidence
Charisma
Determination
Sociability
Integrity
Leadership Snapshot: Nelson Mandela
Leadership Traits in Practice
George Washington (1732–1799)
Winston Churchill (1874–1965)
Mother Teresa (1910–1997)
Bill Gates (1955–)
Oprah Winfrey (1954–)
8
Summary
Application
2.1 Case Study
2.2 Leadership Traits Questionnaire
2.3 Observational Exercise
2.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
3. Engaging Strengths
Introduction
Strengths-Based Leadership Explained
Historical Background
Identifying and Measuring Strengths
Strengths-Based Leadership in Practice
Discovering Your Strengths
Developing Your Strengths
Addressing Your Weaknesses
Leadership Snapshot: Steve Jobs
Recognizing and Engaging the Strengths of Others
Fostering a Positive Strengths-Based Environment
Summary
Application
3.1 Case Study
3.2 Leadership Strengths Questionnaire
3.3 Observational Exercise
3.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
4. Understanding Philosophy and Styles
Introduction
Leadership Philosophy Explained
Theory X
Theory Y
Leadership Styles Explained
Authoritarian Leadership Style
Democratic Leadership Style
Laissez-Faire Leadership Style
Leadership Snapshot: Victoria Ransom
Leadership Styles in Practice
Summary
Application
4.1 Case Study
4.2 Leadership Styles Questionnaire
9
4.3 Observational Exercise
4.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
5. Attending to Tasks and Relationships
Introduction
Task and Relationship Styles Explained
Task Style
Relationship Style
Leadership Snapshot: Mick Wilz
Task and Relationship Styles in Practice
Task Leadership
Relationship Leadership
Summary
Application
5.1 Case Study
5.2 Task and Relationship Questionnaire
5.3 Observational Exercise
5.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
6. Developing Leadership Skills
Introduction
Administrative Skills Explained
Administrative Skills in Practice
Interpersonal Skills Explained
Interpersonal Skills in Practice
Leadership Snapshot: Coquese Washington
Conceptual Skills Explained
Conceptual Skills in Practice
Summary
Application
6.1 Case Study
6.2 Leadership Skills Questionnaire
6.3 Observational Exercise
6.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
7. Creating a Vision
Introduction
Vision Explained
A Picture
A Change
Values
10
Leadership Snapshot: Rosalie Giffoniello
A Map
A Challenge
Vision in Practice
Articulating a Vision
Implementing a Vision
Summary
Application
7.1 Case Study
7.2 Leadership Vision Questionnaire
7.3 Observational Exercise
7.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
8. Establishing a Constructive Climate
Introduction
Constructive Climate Explained
Climate in Practice
Providing Structure
Clarifying Norms
Building Cohesiveness
Promoting Standards of Excellence
Leadership Snapshot: Meg Whitman
Summary
Application
8.1 Case Study
8.2 Organizational Climate Questionnaire
8.3 Observational Exercise
8.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
9. Embracing Diversity and Inclusion
Introduction
Diversity and Inclusion Explained
Definitions
Brief Historical Perspective
Inclusion Framework
Leadership Snapshot: Ursula Burns
Diversity and Inclusion in Practice
Model of Inclusive Practices
Leader Practices That Advance Diversity and Inclusion
Barriers to Embracing Diversity and Inclusion
Summary
11
Application
9.1 Case Study
9.2 Cultural Diversity Awareness Questionnaire
9.3 Observational Exercise
9.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
10. Listening to Out-Group Members
Introduction
Out-Group Members Explained
How Out-Groups Form
The Impact of Out-Group Members
Out-Group Members in Practice
Strategy 1: Listen to Out-Group Members
Strategy 2: Show Empathy to Out-Group Members
Strategy 3: Recognize the Unique Contributions of OutGroup Members
Strategy 4: Help Out-Group Members Feel Included
Strategy 5: Create a Special Relationship With Out-Group
Members
Strategy 6: Give Out-Group Members a Voice and
Empower Them to Act
Leadership Snapshot: Abraham Lincoln
Summary
Application
10.1 Case Study
10.2 Building Community Questionnaire
10.3 Observational Exercise
10.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
11. Managing Conflict
Introduction
Conflict Explained
Communication and Conflict
Conflict on the Content Level
Leadership Snapshot: Humaira Bachal
Conflict on the Relational Level
Managing Conflict in Practice
Fisher and Ury Approach to Conflict
Communication Strategies for Conflict Resolution
Kilmann and Thomas Styles of Approaching Conflict
Summary
12
Application
11.1 Case Study
11.2 Conflict Style Questionnaire
11.3 Observational Exercise
11.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
12. Addressing Ethics in Leadership
Introduction
Leadership Ethics Explained
Leadership Ethics in Practice
1. The Character of the Leader
2. The Actions of the Leader
Leadership Snapshot: Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda
Gates
3. The Goals of the Leader
4. The Honesty of the Leader
5. The Power of the Leader
6. The Values of the Leader
Culture and Leadership Ethics
Summary
Application
12.1 Case Study
12.2 Sample Items From the Ethical Leadership Style
Questionnaire
12.3 Observational Exercise
12.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
13. Overcoming Obstacles
Introduction
Obstacles Explained
Overcoming Obstacles in Practice
Obstacle 1: Unclear Goals
Obstacle 2: Unclear Directions
Obstacle 3: Low Motivation
Leadership Snapshot: Bill Courtney
Obstacle 4: Complex Tasks
Obstacle 5: Simple Tasks
Obstacle 6: Low Involvement
Obstacle 7: Lack of a Challenge
Summary
Application
13
13.1 Case Study
13.2 Path–Goal Styles Questionnaire
13.3 Observational Exercise
13.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
References
Glossary
Index
14
Preface
Leadership is a salient topic today. Given the volatility of global events
and our national political climate, it is even more important now than it
was when the third edition of this book was published. The public remains
fascinated by who leaders are and what leaders do. People want to know
what accounts for good leadership and how to become good leaders.
Despite this strong interest in leadership, there are very few books that
clearly describe the complexities of practicing leadership. I have written
Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice to fill this void.
Each chapter describes a fundamental principle of leadership and how it
relates in practice to becoming an effective leader. These fundamentals are
illustrated through examples, profiles of effective leaders, and case studies.
The text comprises 13 chapters: Chapter 1, “Understanding
Leadership,” analyzes how different definitions of leadership have an
impact on the practice of leadership. Chapter 2, “Recognizing Your
Traits,” examines leadership traits found to be important in social science
research and explores the leadership traits of a select group of historical
and contemporary leaders. Chapter 3, “Engaging Strengths,” discusses
the emerging field of strengths-based leadership, looking at how several
assessment tools can help one to recognize his or her own strengths and
those of others and then put those strengths to work as an effective leader.
Chapter 4, “Understanding Philosophy and Styles,” explores how a
person’s view of people, work, and human nature forms a personal
philosophy of leadership and how this relates to three commonly observed
styles of leadership: authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire. Chapter
5, “Attending to Tasks and Relationships,” describes how leaders can
integrate and optimize task and relationship behaviors in their leadership
role. Chapter 6, “Developing Leadership Skills,” considers three types
of leadership skills: administrative, interpersonal, and conceptual. Chapter
7, “Creating a Vision,” explores the characteristics of a vision and how a
vision is expressed and implemented. Chapter 8, “Establishing a
Constructive Climate,” focuses on how important it is for leaders who
are running groups or organizations to provide structure, clarify norms,
build cohesiveness, and promote standards of excellence. Chapter 9,
“Embracing Diversity and Inclusion,” discusses the importance of
inclusive leadership and the barriers that can be encountered when trying
to embrace diversity and inclusion. Chapter 10, “Listening to Out15
Group Members,” explores the nature of out-groups, their impact, and
ways leaders should respond to out-group members. Chapter 11,
“Managing Conflict,” addresses the question of how we can manage
conflict and produce positive change. Chapter 12, “Addressing Ethics in
Leadership,” explores six factors that are related directly to ethical
leadership: character, actions, goals, honesty, power, and values. Finally,
Chapter 13, “Overcoming Obstacles,” addresses seven obstacles that
subordinates may face and how a leader can help to overcome these.
New to This Edition
This edition retains the chapters of the previous edition but has been
expanded and enhanced in several ways:
First and foremost, it includes a new chapter on diversity and
inclusion that examines the nature of diversity and inclusion,
provides a model of inclusive behavior, describes communication
practices to improve inclusion, and identifies barriers to effective
inclusive leadership.
Second, this edition premieres the Ethical Leadership Style
Questionnaire, a self-assessment instrument that allows readers to
learn what their ethical leadership behaviors tend to be. The
questionnaire in this book is an abridged edition of a longer, more
comprehensive assessment available to readers online.
Third, several chapters include a look at the dark side of leadership
in terms of the approaches explored in the book.
Fourth, new case studies, examples, and research are integrated
throughout the book.
Fifth, this edition includes new “Ask the Author” videos that show
Peter Northouse answering student questions.
Special Features
Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice is designed to help the
reader understand how to become a better leader. While the book is
grounded in leadership theory, it describes the basics of leadership in an
understandable and user-friendly way. Each chapter focuses on a
fundamental aspect of leadership, discusses how it can be applied in real
leadership situations, and provides a relevant profile of a leader.
16
Perhaps the most notable features of this book are the four applied
activities included in every chapter, which allow the reader to explore
leadership concepts and real-world applications:
Case studies illustrate the leadership concepts discussed in the
chapter. At the end of each case, thought-provoking questions help
the reader analyze the case using ideas presented in the chapter.
Self-assessment questionnaires help the reader determine his or her
own leadership style and preferences. Students may want to complete
this questionnaire before reading the chapter’s content. By
completing the questionnaire first, the reader will be more aware of
how the chapter’s content specifically applies to his or her leadership
tendencies.
Observational exercises guide the reader in examining behaviors of
leaders from his or her life experiences.
Reflection and action worksheets stimulate the reader to reflect on
his or her leadership style and identify actions to take to become more
effective.
Audience
A practice-oriented book, Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and
Practice is written in a user-friendly style appropriate for introductory
leadership courses across disciplines. Specifically, it is well suited for
programs in leadership studies and leadership courses in schools of
agriculture, allied health, business, management, communication,
education, engineering, military science, public administration, nursing,
political science, social work, and religion. In addition, this book is
appropriate for programs in continuing education, corporate training,
executive development, in-service training, and government training. It is
also useful for student extracurricular activities.
Digital Resources
SAGE coursepacks allow instructors to import high-quality online
resources directly into Blackboard, Canvas, Moodle, or Brightspace by
Desire2Learn (D2L) in an intuitive, simple format. Instructors who do not
use an LMS platform can still access many of the online resources by
visiting edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e.
17
SAGE coursepacks include, for each chapter:
A diverse range of test items with pretests, posttests, and test banks
built on Bloom’s Taxonomy and AACSB standards, available with
ExamView test generation
Assignable SAGE Premium Video (available via the interactive
eBook version, linked through SAGE coursepacks) that includes
insights from Peter G. Northouse and other leadership experts, with
corresponding multimedia assessment options that automatically
feed to a gradebook
A comprehensive Media Guide for the video resources
Discussion questions to help launch classroom interaction
SAGE journal articles to show how scholarship relates to chapter
concepts
Editable, chapter-specific PowerPoint® slides that offer flexibility
when creating multimedia lectures
Sample course syllabi with suggested models for structuring a
leadership course
Lecture notes that summarize key concepts for each chapter
Ideas for class activities that can be used in class to reinforce active
learning
Web exercises that direct students to useful websites to complete
creative activities and reinforce learning
Suggested films to facilitate showing examples of leadership in
action
Case notes that include case summaries, analyses, and sample
answers to case questions
The Reflection and Action Worksheets and Observational
Exercises from the text in downloadable Word document format for
more flexibility in using these resources
Tables and figures from the textbook
SAGE edge for students at edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e
enhances learning in an easy-to-use environment that offers, for each
chapter, learning objectives, action plans to track progress, mobile-friendly
flashcards and practice quizzes, SAGE Premium Video featuring author
Peter G. Northouse, additional multimedia resources, and selected SAGE
journal articles to strengthen learning.
Interactive eBook
18
An interactive eBook version of the text is available for students to provide
a contemporary, multimedia-integrated presentation for learning. In
addition to a fully electronic textbook, students can link directly to “Ask
the Author” video, audio, additional enrichment readings from SAGE
journals titles, and other relevant resources, bringing the subject matter to
life in a way a traditional print text cannot.
The interactive eBook features exclusive Interactive Leadership
Assessments to help students strengthen their leadership abilities by
providing them with individualized feedback based on their responses to
each questionnaire. After completing each questionnaire, a student using
the interactive eBook will receive an in-depth analysis of her or his scores
as well as personalized, pragmatic suggestions for further developing her
or his leadership.
You can find the eBook icons in the print and electronic versions of the
text. Below is a guide to the icons:
“Ask the Author” video icon
SAGE journal article icon
Video icon
Web icon
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my appreciation to many individuals who directly
or indirectly played a role in the development of this book. First, I would
like to thank the many people at SAGE Publications, in particular my
editor, Maggie Stanley, who along with her leadership team (Liz Thornton,
Lauren Holmes, Neda Dallal, Katie Ancheta, Ashlee Blunk, Georgia
Mclaughlin, and Gail Buschman) has competently guided this revision
19
from the beginning review phase through the production phase. In
addition, I would like to thank copy editor Melinda Masson and production
editor Libby Larson. In their own unique ways, each of these people made
valuable contributions that enhanced the overall quality of the book.
Collectively, they are an extraordinary team that demonstrates the very
highest standards of excellence in all that they do.
For their thoughtful and constructive feedback on this latest edition, I
would like to thank the following reviewers:
Jens Beyer, Hochschule Anhalt Standort Bernburg
Carl Blencke, University of Central Florida
Roger Clark, NWN Corporation
Dan Cunningham, McDaniel College
D. Keith Gurley, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Sat Ananda Hayden, University of Southern Mississippi
Sharon Kabes, Southwest Minnesota State University
Lorin Leone, Independence University
Douglas Micklich, Illinois State University
Bryan Patterson, Johnson C. Smith University, Northeastern
University
Robert W. Robertson, Independence University
Lou L. Sabina, Stetson University
Stephanie Schnurr, University of Warwick
Douglas Threet, Foothill College
Simone Wesner, Birkbeck, University of London
Paula White, Independence University
Cecilia Williams, Independence University
For comprehensive reviews of past editions, I would like to thank the
following reviewers:
Maureen Baldwin, Saint Ambrose University
Barry L. Boyd, Texas A&M University
Susan Bramlett Epps, East Tennessee State University
Linda L. Brennan, Mercer University
Shannon Brown, Benedictine University
Lisa Burgoon, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tom Butkiewicz, University of Redlands
Patricia Cane, Klamath Community College
Stephen C. Carlson, Piedmont College
20
Melissa K. Carsten, Winthrop University
James R. “Chip” Coldren Jr., Governors State University
Barbara Collins, Cabrini College
Stacey A. Cook, College of Marin
Ronald J. Cugno, Nova Southeastern University
Greg Czyszczon, James Madison University
Douglas Davenport, Truman State University
Edward Desmarais, Salem State College
Marco Dowell, California State University, Dominguez Hills
Tiffany Erk, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
Leon Fraser, Rutgers Business School
Jim Fullerton, Idaho State University
Jennifer Garcia, Saint Leo University
Don Green, Lincoln Christian University
Francesca Grippa, Northeastern University
Yael Hellman, Woodbury University
Vanessa Hill, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Martha A. Hunt, NHTI—Concord’s Community College
Jean Gabriel Jolivet, Southwestern College
Ruth Klein, Le Moyne College
Renee Kosiarek, North Central College
Robert Larison, Eastern Oregon University
Karen A. Longman, Azusa Pacific University
Maureen Majury, Bellevue Community College
James L. Morrison, University of Delaware
Terry W. Mullins, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Jane Murtaugh, College of DuPage
Joanne E. Nottingham, University of North Carolina, Wilmington
Ramona Ortega-Liston, University of Akron
Ron Parlett, Nova Southeastern University
Bruce Peterson, Sonoma State University
Joseph W. T. Pugh, Immaculata University
Deana Raffo, Middle Tennessee State University
Melody Rawlings, Northern Kentucky University
Bronte H. Reynolds, California State University, Northridge
Louis Rubino, California State University, Northridge
Laurie A. Schreiner, Azusa Pacific University
Thomas Shields, University of Richmond
Pearl Sims, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University
Bruce Tucker, Santa Fe Community College
Mary Tucker, Ohio University
21
John Tummons, University of Missouri
Sameer Vaidya, Texas Wesleyan University
Natalie N. Walker, Seminole State College
Amy Wilson, University at Buffalo
Laurie Woodward, University of South Florida
Critiques by these reviewers were invaluable in helping to focus my
thinking and writing during the revision process.
I would like to thank Dr. Bernardo Ferdman for his helpful comments and
suggestions on the “Embracing Diversity and Inclusion” chapter, and
Terry Hammink for his assistance in the construction and scoring of the
Ethical Leadership Style Questionnaire and James Ludema for his support.
For their outstanding work in developing creative resources for this
edition, I am grateful to Isolde Anderson of Hope College, Matthew
Creasy of the University of Delaware, Jeff Paul of the University of Tulsa,
Lou Sabina of Stetson University, Andrea Smith-Hunter of Siena College,
and Douglas Threet of Foothill College.
Finally, I wish to thank Marie Lee for her thorough editing and
commitment and Laurel Northouse for her editorial insights and
extraordinary support. It takes a lot of dedicated people to write a book,
and I feel fortunate to have those people in my life.
In the electronic edition of the book you have purchased, there are several
icons that reference links (videos, journal articles) to additional content.
Though the electronic edition links are not live, all content referenced may
be accessed at edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e . This URL is referenced
at several points throughout your electronic edition.
22
About the Author
Peter G. Northouse,
PhD, is Professor Emeritus of Communication in the School of
Communication at Western Michigan University. In addition to
publications in professional journals, he is the author of Leadership:
Theory and Practice (now in its seventh edition) and coauthor of
Health Communication: Strategies for Health Professionals (now in
its third edition) and Leadership Case Studies in Education. His
scholarly and curricular interests include models of leadership,
leadership assessment, ethical leadership, and leadership and group
23
dynamics. For more than 30 years, he has taught undergraduate and
graduate courses in leadership, interpersonal communication, and
organizational communication on both the undergraduate and
graduate levels. Currently, he is a consultant and lecturer on trends in
leadership research, leadership development, and leadership
education. He holds a doctorate in speech communication from the
University of Denver, and master’s and bachelor’s degrees in
communication education from Michigan State University.
24
1 Understanding Leadership
Introduction
This book is about what it takes to be a leader. Everyone, at some time in
life, is asked to be a leader, whether to lead a classroom discussion, coach
a children’s soccer team, or direct a fund-raising campaign. Many
situations require leadership. A leader may have a high profile (e.g., an
elected public official) or a low profile (e.g., a volunteer leader in Big
Brothers Big Sisters), but in every situation there are leadership demands
placed on the individual who is the leader. Being a leader is challenging,
exciting, and rewarding, and carries with it many responsibilities. This
chapter discusses different ways of looking at leadership and their impacts
on what it means to be a leader.
What is Leadership?
Leadership Explained
At the outset, it is important to address a basic question: What is
leadership? Scholars who study leadership have struggled with this
question for many decades and have written a great deal about the nature
of leadership (Antonakis, Cianciolo, & Sternberg, 2004; Bass, 1990;
Conger & Riggio, 2007). (See Box 1.1.)
In leadership literature, more than 100 different definitions of leadership
have been identified (Rost, 1991). Despite these many definitions, a
number of concepts are recognized by most people as accurately reflecting
what it is to be a leader.
Leadership Basics
“Leadership Is a Trait”
25
First, leadership is thought of as a trait. A trait is a distinguishing quality
of an individual, which is often inherited. Defining leadership as a trait
means that each individual brings to the table certain qualities that
influence the way he or she leads. Some leaders are confident, some are
decisive, and still others are outgoing and sociable. Saying that leadership
is a trait places a great deal of emphasis on the leader and on the leader’s
special gifts. It follows the often-expressed belief “leaders are born, not
made.” Some argue that focusing on traits makes leadership an elitist
enterprise because it implies that only a few people with special talents
will lead. Although there may be some truth to this argument, it can also
be argued that all of us are born with a wide array of unique traits and that
many of these traits can have a positive impact on our leadership. It also
may be possible to modify or change some traits.
Through the years, researchers have identified a multitude of traits that are
associated with leadership. In Chapter 2 we will discuss some key
leadership traits, and in Chapter 3 we will explain how strength-based
leadership is a variation of trait leadership. Although there are many
important leadership traits, what is most important for leaders is having the
required traits that a particular situation demands. For example, a chaotic
emergency room at a hospital requires a leader who is insightful and
decisive and can bring calm to the situation. Conversely, a high school
classroom in which students are bored demands a teacher who is inspiring
and creative. Effective leadership results when the leader engages the right
traits in the right place at the right time.
“Leadership Is an Ability”
In addition to being thought of as a trait, leadership is conceptualized as an
ability. A person who has leadership ability is able to be a leader—that is,
has the capacity to lead. While the term ability frequently refers to a
natural capacity, ability can be acquired. For example, some people are
naturally good at public speaking, while others rehearse to become
comfortable speaking in public. Similarly, some people have the natural
physical ability to excel in a sport, while others develop their athletic
capacity through exercise and practice. In leadership, some people have
the natural ability to lead, while others develop their leadership abilities
through hard work and practice.
Box 1.1 The Evolution of Leadership
26
Leadership has long intrigued humankind and has been the topic of
extensive literature for centuries. The earliest writings include
philosophies of leadership such as Machiavelli’s The Prince
(1531/2005) and biographies of great leaders. With the development of
the social sciences during the 20th century, inquiry into leadership
became prolific. Studies on leadership have emerged from every
discipline “that has had some interest in the subject of leadership:
anthropology, business administration, educational administration,
history, military science, nursing administration, organizational
behavior, philosophy, political science, public administration,
psychology, sociology, and theology” (Rost, 1991, p. 45).
As a result, there are many different leadership approaches and theories.
While the words are often used interchangeably, approaches and
theories are different conceptually. An approach is a general way of
thinking about a phenomenon, not necessarily based on empirical
research. A theory usually includes a set of hypotheses, principles, or
laws that explain a given phenomenon. Theories are more refined and
can provide a predictive framework in analyzing the phenomenon. For
example, the spiritual leadership approach is a conceptualization of
leadership that does not yet have a body of empirical research to
validate it, while contingency leadership theory has a refined set of
propositions based on the results of multiple research studies.
Not unlike fashion, approaches to leadership have evolved, changed
focus and direction, and built upon one another during the past century.
To understand this evolution, a brief historical view can be helpful:
Trait Approach
The early trait approach theories were called “Great Man” theories
because they focused on identifying the innate qualities and
characteristics possessed by great social, political, and military leaders
such as Catherine the Great, Mohandas Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln,
Moses, and Joan of Arc. Studies of leadership traits were especially
strong from 1900 to the early 1940s and enjoyed a renewed emphasis
beginning in the 1970s as researchers began to examine visionary and
charismatic leadership. In the 1980s, researchers linked leadership to
the “Big Five” personality factors while interest in emotional
intelligence as a trait gained favor in the 1990s. (For a discussion of
emotional intelligence as a leadership skill, see Chapter 6, pages 126–
127.)
Behavior Approach
27
In the late 1930s, leadership research began to focus on behavior—what
leaders do and how they act. Groundbreaking studies by researchers at
The Ohio State University and the University of Michigan in the 1940s
and 1950s analyzed how leaders acted in small group situations.
Behavior approach theories hit their heyday in the early 1960s with
Blake and Moulton’s (1964) work exploring how managers use task
and relationship behaviors in the organizational setting.
Situational Approach
The premise of this approach is that different situations demand
different kinds of leadership. Serious examination of situational
approach theories began in the late 1960s by Hersey and Blanchard
(1969) and Reddin (1967). Situational approaches continued to be
refined and revised from the 1970s through the 1990s (Vecchio, 1987).
One of these, path–goal theory, examines how leaders use employee
motivation to enhance performance and satisfaction. Another approach,
contingency theory, focuses on the match between the leader’s style
and specific situational variables.
Relational Approach
In the 1990s, researchers began examining the nature of relations
between leaders and followers. This research ultimately evolved into
the leader–member exchange (LMX) theory. LMX theory predicts
that high-quality relations generate more positive leader outcomes than
low-quality relations. Research in the relational approach to
leadership continues to generate moderate interest today.
“New Leadership” Approach
When these approaches began appearing in the mid-1980s—three
decades ago—they were, and continue to be, called “new leadership”
approaches (Bryman, 1992). Beginning with the work of Bass (1985,
1990), leadership studies generated visionary or charismatic leadership
theories. From these approaches developed transformational
leadership theory, which describes leadership as a process that
changes people and organizations.
Emerging Leadership Approaches
A diverse range of approaches to leadership is emerging during the 21st
century:
28
Adaptive leadership examines how leaders help people address
problems, face challenges, and adapt to change. Adaptive
leadership stresses that the leaders don’t solve the problems, but
rather encourage others to do the problem solving and adapt to
change.
Authentic leadership is an approach that looks at the authenticity
of leaders and their leadership and is currently enjoying strong
interest.
Spiritual leadership considers how leaders use values, a sense of
“calling,” and membership to motivate followers.
Servant leadership emphasizes the “caring principle” with
leaders as “servants” who focus on their followers’ needs in order
to help these followers become more autonomous, knowledgeable,
and like servants themselves.
Gender-based studies, which have gained much momentum as
women continue to become more dominant in the workforce,
especially on a global level, view how one’s gender affects and
differentiates one’s leadership.
The historical timeline in Figure 1.1 is not intended to represent these
approaches as separate and distinct eras, only to disappear from the
picture when a new theory appears. Instead, many of these theories
occur concurrently, building upon one another. Even when a certain
approach’s period of popularity has waned, the theory continues to
influence further study and the development of new leadership
approaches.
Figure 1.1 Development of Leadership Theories Through History
Source: Adapted from Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg,
R. J. (Eds.). (2004). The nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, p. 7.
29
Key Theories
An example of leadership as ability is the legendary University of
California at Los Angeles basketball coach John Wooden, whose teams
won seven consecutive National Collegiate Athletic Association titles.
Described first as a teacher and then as a coach, Wooden implemented
four laws of learning into his coaching: explanation, demonstration,
imitation, and repetition. His goal was to teach players how to do the right
thing instinctively under great pressure. Less visible or well known, but
also an example of leadership as ability, is the unheralded but highly
effective restaurant manager who, through years of experience and
learning, is able to create a successful, award-winning restaurant. In both
of these examples, it is the individuals’ abilities that create outstanding
leadership.
“Leadership Is a Skill”
Third, leadership is a skill. Conceptualized as a skill, leadership is a
competency developed to accomplish a task effectively. Skilled leaders are
competent people who know the means and methods for carrying out their
responsibilities. For example, a skilled leader in a fund-raising campaign
knows every step and procedure in the fund-raising process and is able to
use this knowledge to run an effective campaign. In short, skilled leaders
are competent—they know what they need to do, and they know how to do
it.
Describing leadership as a skill makes leadership available to everyone
because skills are competencies that people can learn or develop. Even
without natural leadership ability, people can improve their leadership with
practice, instruction, and feedback from others. Viewed as a skill,
leadership can be studied and learned. If you are capable of learning from
experience, you can acquire leadership.
“Leadership Is a Behavior”
Leadership is also a behavior. It is what leaders do when they are in a
leadership role. The behavioral dimension is concerned with how leaders
30
act toward others in various situations. Unlike traits, abilities, and skills,
leadership behaviors are observable. When someone leads, we see that
person’s leadership behavior.
Leadership Behaviors
Research on leadership has shown that leaders engage primarily in two
kinds of general behaviors: task behaviors and process behaviors. Task
behaviors are used by leaders to get the job done (e.g., a leader prepares
an agenda for a meeting). Process behaviors are used by leaders to help
people feel comfortable with other group members and at ease in the
situations in which they find themselves (e.g., a leader helps individuals in
a group to feel included). Since leadership requires both task and process
behaviors, the challenge for leaders is to know the best way to combine
them in their efforts to reach a goal.
“Leadership Is a Relationship”
Another, and a somewhat unusual, way to think about leadership is as a
relationship. From this perspective, leadership is centered on the
communication between leaders and followers rather than on the unique
qualities of the leader. Thought of as a relationship, leadership becomes a
process of collaboration that occurs between leaders and followers (Rost,
1991). A leader affects and is affected by followers, and both leader and
followers are affected in turn by the situation that surrounds them. This
approach emphasizes that leadership is not a linear one-way event, but
rather an interactive event. In traditional leadership, authority is often top
down; in the interactive type of leadership, authority and influence are
shared. When leadership is defined in this manner, it becomes available to
everyone. It is not restricted to the formally designated leader in a group.
Leadership and Change
Thinking of leadership as a relationship suggests that leaders must include
followers and their interests in the process of leadership. A leader needs to
be fully aware of the followers and the followers’ interests, ideas,
positions, attitudes, and motivations. In addition, this approach has an
31
ethical overtone because it stresses the need for leaders to work with
followers to achieve their mutual purposes. Stressing mutuality lessens the
possibility that leaders might act toward followers in ways that are forced
or unethical. It also increases the possibility that leaders and followers will
work together toward a common good (Rost, 1991).
“Leadership Is an Influence Process”
A final way of thinking about leadership is as an influence process. This is
the perspective that will be emphasized in this book.
Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of
individuals to achieve a common goal.
Leadership Development
Defining leadership as an influence process means that it is not a trait or an
ability that resides in the leader, but rather an interactive event that occurs
between the leader and the followers. Influence is central to the process of
leadership because leaders affect followers. Leaders direct their energies
toward influencing individuals to achieve something together. Stressing
common goals gives leadership an ethical dimension because it lessens the
possibility that leaders might act toward followers in ways that use
coercion or are unethical.
Finally, in explaining what leadership is, it is important to make a
distinction between leadership and management. In discussing what
leadership is and can be, the concepts of leadership and management
sometimes overlap. Both leadership and management involve influence,
but leadership is about seeking constructive change, and management is
about establishing order. For example, it is often said that “managers are
people who do things right, and leaders are people who do the right thing.”
Since both leaders and managers are engaged in influencing people toward
goal accomplishment, our discussion in this book will treat the roles of
managers and leaders similarly and not emphasize the differences between
them.
32
Global Leadership Attributes
We probably all wonder at the differences in leadership around the world.
Why do some countries gravitate toward the distributed leadership of a
democracy, while others seem content with the hierarchical leadership of a
monarchy or dictatorship? The definition and concepts of leadership
outlined in this chapter are from an American perspective. If you were to
travel to nations across the world, you would no doubt encounter different
views of leadership specific to those ethnic and political cultures.
Universal Leadership Attributes
In 2004, Robert House led a group of 160 researchers in an ambitious
study to increase our understanding of the impact culture has on leadership
effectiveness. The GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational
Behavior Effectiveness) studies drew on the input of 17,000 people in 62
countries in determining how leadership varies across the world. Among
the many findings generated by the GLOBE studies was the identification
of positive and negative leadership characteristics that are universally
accepted worldwide (see Table 1.1).
33
Source: Adapted from House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., &
Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of
62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 677–678. Reprinted with permission.
The Dark Side of Leadership
Those same characteristics and behaviors that distinguish leadership can
also be used by leaders in nonpositive ways (Conger, 1990). The dark side
of leadership is the destructive side of leadership where a leader uses his
or her influence or power for personal ends. Lipman-Blumen (2005)
suggests that such leaders are “toxic,” where their leadership leaves their
followers worse off than they found them, often violating the basic human
rights of others and playing to their followers’ basest fears. Dark
leadership is able to thrive when three conditions exist, according to
Padilla, Hogan, and Kaiser (2007): a destructive leader, susceptible
followers, and a conducive environment. Destructive leaders will prevail
when the checks and balances of an organization are weak and the rules of
the institution are ineffective. While many cite Adolf Hitler as the prime
example of the dark side of leadership, there are many current examples in
the world today from the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, whose
leadership has led to violent civil war that has left hundreds of thousands
dead, to religious extremist groups, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda, who use
34
their followers to engage in mass murder of innocents.
The Dark Side of Leadership
The meaning of leadership is complex and includes many dimensions. For
some people, leadership is a trait or an ability, for others it is a skill or a
behavior, and for still others it is a relationship or a process. In reality,
leadership probably includes components of all of these dimensions. Each
dimension explains a facet of leadership.
Destructive Leadership
In considering these various definitions of leadership and based on the
results of your Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire (page 14),
which dimension seems closest to how you think of leadership? How
would you define leadership? Answers to these questions are important
because how you think about leadership will strongly influence how you
practice leadership.
There is a strong demand for effective leadership in society today. This
demand exists at the local and community levels, as well as at the national
level, in this country and abroad. People feel the need for leadership in all
aspects of their lives. They want leaders in their personal lives, at school,
in the work setting, and even in their spiritual lives. Everywhere you turn,
people are expressing a need for strong leadership.
When people ask for leadership in a particular situation, it is not always
clear exactly what they want. For the most part, however, they want
effective leadership. Effective leadership is intended influence that creates
change for the greater good. Leadership uses positive means to achieve
positive outcomes. Furthermore, people want leaders who listen to and
understand their needs and who can relate to their circumstances. The
challenge for each of us is to be prepared to lead when we are asked to be
the leader.
Leadership Snapshot: Indra Nooyi, CEO, PepsiCo
35
Mark Wilson/Staff/Getty Images News/Getty Images
The daughter of a conservative, middle-class family in southern India,
Indra Nooyi didn’t seem destined to one day run one of the world’s
largest snack food and beverage companies. But Nooyi does just that as
the CEO and president of PepsiCo, making her one of the top female
executives in the United States and probably the highest-ranking
woman of Indian heritage in corporate America.
Nooyi, who grew up in Madras (now Chennai), India, admits she
always pushed social conventions. She played on an all-girls cricket
team and was a guitarist in a rock band at a time when it was deemed
inappropriate for Indian girls to do such things. Despite graduating from
college with bachelor’s degrees in chemistry, math, and physics from
36
Madras Christian College in 1974 and a master of business
administration from the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Nooyi
was reportedly remembered for being only a “mediocre student”
(Pandey, 2006).
Nooyi’s first job after college was for Tootal, a British textile company
in India, but she was hired away as a brand manager for Johnson &
Johnson to oversee the company’s Stayfree account in India. It was a
job that would have challenged the most seasoned marketing executive
because, at the time, advertising women’s feminine products was not
allowed in her country (Murray, 2004).
By 1978, Nooyi felt she needed more preparation for the business world
and applied to and was accepted to the Yale School of Management in
the United States. To her surprise, her parents agreed to let her go,
although it would essentially make her an unmarriageable commodity
in her culture. She received financial aid from Yale, but still struggled
to make ends meet, working as an overnight receptionist. She didn’t
have the money to buy a business suit, so she wore her traditional sari
to work and later in job interviews, choosing to be herself rather than
adhere to expected cultural norms.
Nooyi did not earn an MBA from Yale, choosing instead to get a
master’s degree in public and private management. Her first jobs after
graduation were for the prestigious Boston Consulting Group and
Motorola. In 1990, she joined ASEA Brown Boveri (ABB), a SwissSwedish industrial conglomerate. Her success in directing ABB’s North
American operations caught the attention of PepsiCo CEO Wayne
Calloway who wooed her away to become his company’s chief
strategist.
Nooyi quickly left her mark at PepsiCo. She was the chief deal maker
for two of PepsiCo’s most important acquisitions: the Tropicana orange
juice brand in 1998 and Quaker Oats in 2001. The Quaker Oats deal
added a huge range of cereals and snack foods to the PepsiCo empire.
Nooyi also helped the company acquire beverage maker SoBe, beating
out a competing offer from Coca-Cola. Her deal-making talents
elevated her to the job of PepsiCo’s chief financial officer in 2000, and
a year later she was given the title of president.
Nooyi’s vision for PepsiCo—that “for any part of the day, we will have
a little snack for you” (Byrnes, 2001)—has been implemented through
development of new products and acquisitions. The company now sells
a wide range of foods and beverages from Cap’n Crunch and Doritos to
Mountain Dew and Gatorade. The company’s 18 brands are sold in 200
countries, and it employs 198,000 people worldwide.
37
But the strategist in Nooyi has also foreseen the effect that growing
lifestyle diseases such as obesity could have on her company. Again,
she has chosen to follow an unconventional path, looking to create
healthier products in an industry dominated by salt, fat, and sugar. She
invested heavily in the creation of a research and development lab that
took five years to complete, drawing criticism from stockholders and
industry analysts. So far, the investment has had some success: PepsiCo
introduced a “mid-calorie” cola, Pepsi True, which has 30% less sugar
and uses stevia extract instead of artificial sweeteners, and has created
potato chips that taste just as salty as the original but have less sodium.
The company has also introduced a new line of craft sodas called
Stubborn Soda, which contain natural flavors and sugarcane instead of
high-fructose corn syrup.
Summary
All of us at some time in our lives will be asked to show leadership. When
you are asked to be the leader, it will be both demanding and rewarding.
How you approach leadership is strongly influenced by your definitions of
and beliefs about leadership. Through the years, writers have defined
leadership in a multitude of ways. It is a complex, multidimensional
process that is often conceptualized in a variety of ways by different
people. Some of the most common ways of looking at leadership are as a
trait, as an ability, as a skill, as a behavior, as a relationship, and as a
process. The way you think about leadership will influence the way you
practice leadership.
Glossary Terms
ability 2
adaptive leadership 4
approach 3
authentic leadership 4
behavior approach 3
“Big Five” personality factors 3
contingency theory 4
dark side of leadership 9
emotional intelligence 3
gender-based studies 4
“Great Man” theories 3
38
leader–member exchange (LMX) theory 4
leadership 7
path–goal theory 4
process behaviors 6
relational approach 4
relationship behaviors 3
servant leadership 4
situational approach 4
skill 5
spiritual leadership 4
task behaviors 3, 6
theory 3
trait 2
trait approach 3
transformational leadership theory 4
Sharpen your skills with SAGE edge at
edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e
SAGE edge for students provides a personalized approach to help you
accomplish your coursework goals in an easy-to-use learning
environment.
Application
1.1 Case Study: King of the Hill
Denny Hill’s career as a high school swimming coach didn’t start out
well. The seniors on his team quit in the first season because he
required them to come to all the workouts. The team only won three
meets the whole season. That was 40 years ago. Since that time, the
high school chemistry teacher’s success as a swimming coach has been
extraordinary; his winnings include more than 900 boys’ and girls’ dual
meets and a phenomenal 31 state titles.
Denny is noted for creating a team effort out of what is usually
considered an individual sport. He begins every season with a team
sleepover, followed by “Hell Week,” a two-week grueling regimen in
which team members swim at least 5 miles a workout and 10 miles a
day. He acknowledges this is a bonding experience for the swimmers,
regardless of their skill, because they are “all in the same boat.”
39
Denny passes the mantle of leadership onto his team members. Seniors
are expected to be mature leaders who inform the freshmen of the team
goals and expectations. Juniors are to be role models, while sophomores
serve as quiet leaders who are still learning but have a foundation in the
team culture. Even the freshmen members have a job: They are required
to pay attention to the coaches and other team members as they learn
the team’s culture and what’s expected.
Denny holds a 20-minute team meeting each Monday where every
member has the opportunity to present a rose or a complaint to anyone
on the team including the coaches. He is tough on swimmers and makes
them work, but when they need support he is always there to put an arm
around them. Denny also uses humor, often making jokes that help take
the edge off long, hard workouts.
And despite his teams’ successes, Denny isn’t about winning; he’s more
about preparing to win—telling his swimmers that by preparing to win,
everything takes care of itself. When you do win, he says, you’ve done
it the right way.
Questions
1. What leadership traits account for Denny Hill’s success?
2. How would you describe Denny Hill’s leadership abilities?
3. Leadership includes administrative skills, interpersonal skills, and
conceptual skills. How does Denny Hill stack up on these skills?
4. How does Denny Hill integrate task and relationship behaviors in
his leadership?
5. From a relational perspective, how would you describe Denny
Hill’s leadership?
6. In what way does Denny Hill’s coaching exemplify leadership as
an influence process?
1.2 Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire
Purpose
1. To identify how you view leadership
2. To explore your perceptions of different aspects of leadership
Directions
1. Consider for a moment your own impressions of the word
leadership. Based on your experiences with leaders in your
40
lifetime, what is leadership?
2. Using the scale below, indicate the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the following statements about leadership.
41
Scoring
1. Sum scores on items 1, 7, 13, and 19 (trait emphasis)
2. Sum scores on items 2, 8, 14, and 20 (ability emphasis)
3. Sum scores on items 3, 9, 15, and 21 (skill emphasis)
42
4. Sum scores on items 4, 10, 16, and 22 (behavior emphasis)
5. Sum scores on items 5, 11, 17, and 23 (relationship emphasis)
6. Sum scores on items 6, 12, 18, and 24 (process emphasis)
Total Scores
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Trait emphasis: _________________
Ability emphasis: ________________
Skill emphasis: __________________
Behavior emphasis: ______________
Relationship emphasis: ___________
Process emphasis: _______________
Scoring Interpretation
The scores you received on this questionnaire provide information
about how you define and view leadership. The emphasis you give to
the various dimensions of leadership has implications for how you
approach the leadership process. For example, if your highest score is
for trait emphasis, it suggests that you emphasize the role of the leader
and the leader’s special gifts in the leadership process. However, if your
highest score is for relationship emphasis, it indicates that you think
leadership is centered on the communication between leaders and
followers, rather than on the unique qualities of the leader. By
comparing your scores, you can gain an understanding of the aspects of
leadership that you find most important and least important. The way
you think about leadership will influence how you practice leadership.
Improve Your Leadership Skills
If you have the interactive eBook version of this text, log in to access
the interactive leadership assessment. After completing this chapter’s
questionnaire, you will receive individualized feedback and practical
suggestions for further strengthening your leadership based on your
responses in this questionnaire.
Visit edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e for a downloadable version
of this questionnaire.
1.3 Observational Exercise
Defining Leadership
43
Purpose
1. To develop an understanding of the complexity of leadership
2. To become aware of the different ways people define leadership
Directions
1. In this exercise, select five people you know and interview them
about leadership.
2. Ask each person to give you his or her definition of leadership,
and to describe his or her personal beliefs about effective
leadership.
3. Record each person’s response on a separate sheet of paper.
Person #1 (name)
__________________________________________
Person #2 (name)
_________________________________________
Person #3 (name)
_________________________________________
Person #4 (name)
_________________________________________
Person #5 (name)
_________________________________________
Questions
1. What differences did you observe in how these people define
leadership?
2. What seems to be the most common definition of leadership?
3. In what ways did people describe leadership differently from the
definitions in Chapter 1, “Understanding Leadership”?
4. Of the people interviewed, whose definition comes closest to your
own? Why?
Visit edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e for a downloadable version
of this exercise.
1.4 Reflection and Action Worksheet
Understanding Leadership
44
Reflection
1. Each of us has our own unique way of thinking about leadership.
What leaders or people have influenced you in your thinking
about leadership? Discuss what leadership means to you and give
your definition of leadership.
2. What do the scores you received on the Conceptualizing
Leadership Questionnaire suggest about your perspective on
leadership? Of the six dimensions on the questionnaire (trait,
ability, skill, behavior, relationship, and process), which one is the
most similar to your own perspective? Which one is least like
your own perspective?
3. Do you think leadership is something everyone can learn to do, or
do you think it is a natural ability reserved for a few? Explain your
answer.
Action
1. Based on the interviews you conducted with others about
leadership, how could you incorporate others’ ideas about
leadership into your own leadership?
2. Treating leadership as a relationship has ethical implications. How
could adding the relationship approach to your leadership make
you a better leader? Discuss.
3. Think about your own leadership. Identify one trait, ability, skill,
or behavior that you could develop more fully to become a better
leader.
Visit edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e for a downloadable version
of this worksheet.
References
Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2004). The
nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.
New York, NY: Free Press.
45
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey
of theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press.
Blake, R. R., & Moulton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX:
Gulf.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London, U
K: Sage.
Byrnes, N. (2001, January 29). The power of two at Pepsi. Businessweek.
Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2001-0128/the-power-of-two-at-pepsi
Conger, J. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics,
19(2), 44–55.
Conger, J. A., & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.). (2007). The practice of leadership:
Developing the next generation of leaders. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life-cycle theory of leadership.
Training and Development Journal, 23(5), 26–34.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V.
(2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62
societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Machiavelli, N. (2005). The prince (W. J. Connell, trans.). Boston, MA:
Bedford/St. Martin’s. (Original work published in 1531)
46
Murray, S. (2004, January 26). From poor Indian student to powerful U.S.
business-woman. Financial Times, p. 3.
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle:
Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments.
The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194.
Pandey, J. M. (2006, August 18). Nooyi: IIM-C’s “average” student turns
role model. The Times of India. Retrieved from
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nooyi-IIM-Cs-average-studentturns-role-model/articleshow/1902571.cms
Reddin, W. J. (1967, April). The 3-D management style theory. Training
and Development Journal, pp. 8–17.
Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CO:
Praeger.
Vecchio, R. P. (1987). Situational leadership theory: An examination of a
prescriptive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 444–451.
47
2 Recognizing Your Traits
Introduction
Why are some people leaders while others are not? What makes people
become leaders? Do leaders have certain traits? These questions have been
of interest for many years. It seems that all of us want to know what
characteristics account for effective leadership. This chapter will address
the traits that are important to leadership.
Is Leadership a Trait?
Since the early 20th century, hundreds of research studies have been
conducted on the traits of leaders. These studies have produced an
extensive list of ideal leadership traits (see Antonakis, Cianciolo, &
Sternberg, 2004; Bass, 1990). The list of important leadership traits is long
and includes such traits as diligence, trustworthiness, dependability,
articulateness, sociability, open-mindedness, intelligence, confidence, selfassurance, and conscientiousness. Because the list is so extensive, it is
difficult to identify specifically which traits are essential for leaders. In
fact, nearly all of the traits are probably related to effective leadership.
What traits are important when you are asked to be a leader? To answer
this question, two areas will be addressed in this chapter. First, a set of
selected traits that appear by all accounts to be strongly related to effective
leadership in everyday life will be discussed. Second, the lives of several
historical and contemporary leaders will be examined with a discussion of
the traits that play a role in their leadership. Throughout this discussion,
the unique ways that certain traits affect the leadership process in one way
or another will be emphasized.
Leadership Traits Explained
From the beginning of the 20th century to the present day, researchers
have focused a great deal of attention on the unique characteristics of
successful leaders. Thousands of studies have been conducted to identify
the traits of effective leaders. The results of these studies have produced a
48
very long list of important leadership traits; each of these traits contributes
to the leadership process.
Leadership Traits
For example, research studies by several investigators found the following
traits to be important: achievement, persistence, insight, initiative, selfconfidence, responsibility, cooperativeness, tolerance, influence,
sociability, drive, motivation, integrity, confidence, cognitive ability, task
knowledge, extroversion, conscientiousness, and openness (Judge, Bono,
Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002; Kirkpatrick & Locke, 1991; Stogdill, 1974). On
the international level, House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, and Gupta
(2004), in a study of 17,000 managers in 62 different cultures, identified a
list of 22 valued traits that were universally endorsed as characteristics of
outstanding leadership in these countries. The list, which was outlined in
Table 1.1 in Chapter 1, “Understanding Leadership,” includes such
attributes as being trustworthy, just, honest, encouraging, positive,
dynamic, dependable, intelligent, decisive, communicative, informed, and
a team builder. As these findings indicate, research studies on leadership
traits have identified a wide array of important characteristics of leaders.
Are There Certain Traits a Leader Needs?
However, these research findings raise an important question: If there are
so many important leadership traits, which specific traits do people need to
be successful leaders? While the answer to this question is not crystal
clear, the research points to six key traits: intelligence, confidence,
charisma, determination, sociability, and integrity. In the following
section, we will discuss each of these traits in turn.
Intelligence
Intelligence is an important trait related to effective leadership.
Intelligence includes having good language skills, perceptual skills, and
reasoning ability. This combination of assets makes people good thinkers,
and makes them better leaders.
While it is hard for a person to alter his or her IQ (intelligence quotient),
49
there are certain ways for a person to improve intelligence in general.
Intelligent leaders are well informed. They are aware of what is going on
around them and understand the job that needs to be done. It is important
for leaders to obtain information about what their leadership role entails
and learn as much as possible about their work environment. This
information will help leaders be more knowledgeable and insightful.
For example, a few years ago a friend, Chris, was asked to be the coach of
his daughter’s middle school soccer team even though he had never played
soccer and knew next to nothing about how the game is played. Chris took
the job and eventually was a great success, but not without a lot of effort.
He spent many hours learning about soccer. He read how-to books,
instructors’ manuals, and coaching books. In addition, Chris subscribed to
several soccer magazines. He talked to other coaches and learned
everything he could about playing the game. By the time he had finished
the first season, others considered Chris to be a very competent coach. He
was smart and learned how to be a successful coach.
Regarding intelligence, few if any of us can expect to be another Albert
Einstein. Most of us have average intelligence and know that there are
limits to what we can do. Nevertheless, becoming more knowledgeable
about our leadership positions gives us the information we need to become
better leaders.
Confidence
Being confident is another important trait of an effective leader. Confident
people feel self-assured and believe they can accomplish their goals.
Rather than feeling uncertain, they feel strong and secure about their
positions. They do not second-guess themselves, but rather move forward
on projects with a clear vision. Confident leaders feel a sense of certainty
and believe that they are doing the right thing. Clearly, confidence is a
trait that has to do with feeling positive about oneself and one’s ability to
succeed.
Confidence
If confidence is a central trait of successful leaders, how can you build
your own confidence? First, confidence comes from understanding what is
50
required of you. For example, when first learning to drive a car, a student’s
confidence is low because he or she does not know what to do. If an
instructor explains the driving process and demonstrates how to drive, the
student can gain confidence because he or she now has an understanding
of how to drive. Awareness and understanding build confidence.
Confidence can also come from having a mentor to show the way and
provide constructive feedback. This mentor may be a boss, an experienced
coworker, or a significant other from outside the organization. Because
mentors act as role models and sounding boards, they provide essential
help to learn the dynamics of leadership.
Confidence also comes from practice. This is important to point out,
because practice is something everyone can do. Consider Michael Phelps,
one of the most well-known athletes in the world today. Phelps is a very
gifted swimmer, with 23 Olympic gold medals and the record for winning
the most medals, 28, of any Olympic athlete in history. But Phelps also
spends an enormous amount of time practicing. His workout regimen
includes swimming six hours a day, six days a week. His excellent
performance and confidence are a result of his practice, as well as his gifts.
In leadership, practice builds confidence because it provides assurance that
an aspiring leader can do what needs to be done. Taking on leadership
roles, even minor ones on committees or through volunteer activities,
provides practice for being a leader. Building one leadership activity on
another can increase confidence for more demanding leadership roles.
Those who accept opportunities to practice their leadership will experience
increased confidence in their leadership abilities.
Charisma
Of all the traits related to effective leadership, charisma gets the most
attention. Charisma refers to a leader’s special magnetic charm and
appeal, and can have a huge effect on the leadership process. Charisma is a
special personality characteristic that gives a leader the capacity to do
extraordinary things. In particular, it gives the leader exceptional powers
of influence. A good example of a charismatic leader is former president
John F. Kennedy, who motivated the American people with his eloquent
oratorical style (visit edge.sagepub.com/northouseintro4e to read one of
his speeches). President Kennedy was a gifted, charismatic leader who had
an enormous impact on others.
51
Charismatic Leadership
It is not unusual for many of us to feel challenged with regard to charisma
because it is not a common personality trait. There are a few select people
who are very charismatic, but most of us are not. Since charisma appears
in short supply, the question arises: What do leaders do if they are not
naturally charismatic?
Based on the writings of leadership scholars, several behaviors
characterize charismatic leadership (Conger, 1999; House, 1976; Shamir,
House, & Arthur, 1993). First, charismatic leaders serve as a strong role
model for the values that they desire others to adopt. Mohandas Gandhi
advocated nonviolence and was an exemplary role model of civil
disobedience; his charisma enabled him to influence others. Second,
charismatic leaders show competence in every aspect of leadership, so
others trust their decisions. Third, charismatic leaders articulate clear
goals and strong values. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream”
speech is an example of this type of charismatic leadership. By articulating
his dream, he was able to influence multitudes of people to follow his
nonviolent practices. Fourth, charismatic leaders communicate high
expectations for followers and show confidence in their abilities to meet
these expectations. Finally, charismatic leaders are an inspiration to others.
They can excite and motivate others to become involved in real change, as
demonstrated by John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.
Determination
Determination is another trait that characterizes effective leaders.
Determined leaders are very focused and attentive to tasks. They know
where they are going and how they intend to get there. Determination is
the decision to get the job done; it includes characteristics such as
initiative, persistence, and drive. People with determination are willing to
assert themselves, they are proactive, and they have the capacity to
persevere in the face of obstacles. Being determined includes showing
dominance at times, especially in situations where others need direction.
52
Determination
We have all heard of determined people who have accomplished
spectacular things—the person with cancer who runs a standard 26.2-mile
marathon, the blind person who climbs Mount Everest, or the single mom
with four kids who graduates from college. A good example of determined
leadership is Nelson Mandela, who is featured in the Leadership Snapshot
in this chapter. Mandela’s single goal was to end apartheid in South
Africa. Even though he was imprisoned for many years, he steadfastly held
to his principles. He was committed to reaching his goal, and he never
wavered from his vision. Mandela was focused and disciplined—a
determined leader.
What distinguishes all of these leaders from other people is their
determination to get the job done. Of all the traits discussed in this chapter,
determination is probably the one trait that is easily acquired by those who
lead. All it demands is perseverance. Staying focused on the task,
clarifying the goals, articulating the vision, and encouraging others to stay
the course are characteristics of determined leaders. Being determined
takes discipline and the ability to endure, but having this trait will almost
certainly enhance a person’s leadership.
Sociability
Another important trait for leaders is sociability. Sociability refers to a
leader’s capacity to establish pleasant social relationships. People want
sociable leaders—leaders with whom they can get along. Leaders who
show sociability are friendly, outgoing, courteous, tactful, and diplomatic.
They are sensitive to others’ needs and show concern for their well-being.
Sociable leaders have good interpersonal skills and help to create
cooperative relationships within their work environments.
Being sociable comes easier for some than for others. For example, it is
easy for extroverted leaders to talk to others and be outgoing, but it is
harder for introverted leaders to do so. Similarly, some individuals are
naturally “people persons,” while others prefer to be alone. Although
people vary in the degree to which they are outgoing, it is possible to
increase sociability. A sociable leader gets along with coworkers and other
people in the work setting. Being friendly, kind, and thoughtful, as well as
talking freely with others and giving them support, goes a long way to
establish a leader’s sociability. Sociable leaders bring positive energy to a
53
group and make the work environment a more enjoyable place.
To illustrate, consider the following example. This scenario occurred in
one of the best leadership classes I have had in 40 years of teaching. In this
class, there was a student named Anne Fox who was a very sociable
leader. Anne was an unusual student who dressed like a student from the
1960s, although it was more than two decades later. Even though she
dressed differently than the others, Anne was very caring and was liked by
everyone in the class. After the first week of the semester, Anne could
name everyone in class; when attendance was taken, she knew instantly
who was there and who was not. In class discussions, Anne always
contributed good ideas, and her remarks were sensitive of others’ points of
view. Anne was positive about life, and her attitude was contagious. By
her presence, Anne created an atmosphere in which everyone felt unique
but also included. She was the glue that held us all together. Anne was not
assigned to be the leader in the class, but by the semester’s end she
emerged as a leader. Her sociable nature enabled her to develop strong
relationships and become a leader in the class. By the end of the class, all
of us were the beneficiaries of her leadership.
Integrity
Finally, and perhaps most important, effective leaders have integrity.
Integrity characterizes leaders who possess the qualities of honesty and
trustworthiness. People who adhere to a strong set of principles and take
responsibility for their actions are exhibiting integrity. Leaders with
integrity inspire confidence in others because they can be trusted to do
what they say they are going to do. They are loyal, dependable, and
transparent. Basically, integrity makes a leader believable and worthy of
our trust.
Integrity
Leadership Snapshot: Nelson Mandela, First Black President of South
Africa
54
South Africa The Good News / www.sagoodnews.co.za CC BY 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en
In 1990, when Nelson Mandela was released from prison after serving
27 long years, he was determined not to be angry or vindictive, but
instead to work to unite his country of South Africa, which had been
fractured by generations of apartheid.
The descendent of a tribal king, Mandela was born in 1918 in a small
African village and grew up in a country where Whites ruled through
subjugation and tyranny over Blacks and other races. Mandela attended
Methodist missionary schools and put himself through law school,
eventually opening the first Black law partnership in 1942. His firm
represented the African National Congress (ANC), which was engaged
in resisting South Africa’s apartheid policies, and during the 1950s, he
became a leader of the ANC. Influenced by Mohandas Gandhi,
Mandela was initially committed to nonviolent resistance but shifted to
supporting violent tactics when the government refused to change its
apartheid policies. In 1964, Mandela received a life sentence for
plotting to overthrow the government by violence.
During the nearly three decades Mandela spent in prison, he became a
symbolic figure for the anti-apartheid movement. But during those
years, Mandela spent time examining himself, coming to see himself as
55
others did: as an aggressive and militant revolutionary. He learned to
control his temper and strong will, instead using persuasion and
emphasis to convince others. He listened to others’ life stories,
including those of the White guards, seeking to understand their
perspectives. He was steadfast in maintaining his dignity, carefully
refusing to be subservient while being respectful to the guards and
others. As a result, he became a natural leader inside the prison, while
outside, his fame framed him as a symbolic martyr not only to Black
Africans but also to people across the globe. Free Mandela campaigns
were building around the world, with other countries and international
corporations being pressured by stockholders and citizens to “divest” in
South Africa.
In 1990, South African president F. W. de Klerk, fearing civil war and
economic collapse, released Mandela, at the time 71, from prison.
Mandela emerged as a moral leader who stood by the principles of
liberty and equal rights for all. He began speaking around the world,
raising financial support for the ANC while seeking to bring peace to
his fractured country. In 1992, the South African government instituted
a new constitution and held a popular election with all parties
represented including the ANC. The result? In 1994, Mandela was
elected as the first Black president of South Africa, effectively ending
apartheid. For his role in negotiations to abolish apartheid, Mandela
received the Nobel Peace Prize, sharing it with de Klerk.
As president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999, Mandela’s mission
was to transform a nation from minority rule and apartheid to a
multiracial democracy. On the first day of his presidency, he set the
tone with the predominantly White staff of the former president, telling
them that those who wanted to keep their jobs were welcome to stay,
stating “Reconciliation starts here.” He developed a multiracial staff
and cabinet, using his friendly smiling style and tactic of listening to all
viewpoints carefully before making decisions to keep the staff focused
on problems and issues rather than on partisanship.
Mandela served his five-year term as president but, at 76 years old,
chose not to seek another term. In retirement, he continued to advocate
for social causes, serving as a mediator in disputes outside of South
Africa, and to bring a message of peace and justice throughout the
world. Mandela died in 2013. While it is difficult to summarize all that
he accomplished, Mandela’s legacy is best described by former U.S.
president Bill Clinton who in 2003 wrote, “Under a burden of
oppression he saw through difference, discrimination and destruction to
embrace our common humanity.”
56
Grown-ups often tell children, “Never tell a lie.” For children, the lesson is
“Good children are truthful.” For leaders, the lesson is the same: “Good
leaders are honest.” Dishonesty creates mistrust in others, and dishonest
leaders are seen as undependable and unreliable. Honesty helps people to
have trust and faith in what leaders have to say and what they stand for.
Honesty also enhances a leader’s ability to influence others because they
have confidence in and believe in their leader.
Integrity demands being open with others and representing reality as fully
and completely as possible. However, this is not an easy task: There are
times when telling the complete truth can be destructive or
counterproductive. The challenge for leaders is to strike a balance between
being open and candid and monitoring what is appropriate to disclose in a
particular situation. While it is important for leaders to be authentic, it is
also essential for them to have integrity in their relationships with others.
Integrity undergirds all aspects of leadership. It is at the core of being a
leader. Integrity is a central aspect of a leader’s ability to influence. If
people do not trust a leader, the leader’s influence potential is weakened.
In essence, integrity is the bedrock of who a leader is. When a leader’s
integrity comes into question, his or her potential to lead is lost.
Former president Bill Clinton (1993–2001) is a good example of how
integrity is related to leadership. In the late 1990s, he was brought before
the U.S. Congress for misrepresenting under oath an affair he had engaged
in with a White House intern. For his actions, he was impeached by the
U.S. House of Representatives, but then was acquitted by the U.S. Senate.
At one point during the long ordeal, the president appeared on national
television and, in what is now a famous speech, declared his innocence.
Because subsequent hearings provided information suggesting he might
have lied during his television speech, many Americans felt Clinton had
violated his duty and responsibility as a person, leader, and president. As a
result, Clinton’s integrity was clearly challenged and the impact of his
leadership substantially weakened.
Effective Traits
In conclusion, there are many traits related to effective leadership. The six
traits discussed here appear to be particularly important in the leadership
process. As will be revealed in subsequent chapters, leadership is a very
57
complex process. The traits discussed in this chapter are important but are
only one dimension of a multidimensional process.
Leadership Traits in Practice
Throughout history, there have been many great leaders. Each of them has
led with unique talents and in different circumstances. The following
section analyzes the accomplishments and the traits of five famous leaders.
Although there are hundreds of equally distinguished leaders, these five
are highlighted because they represent different kinds of leadership at
different points in history. All of these leaders are recognized as being
notable leaders: Each has had an impact on many people’s lives and
accomplished great things.
Traits of Great Leaders
The leaders discussed below are George Washington, Winston Churchill,
Mother Teresa, Bill Gates, and Oprah Winfrey. As you read about each of
them, think about their leadership traits.
George Washington (1732–1799)
George Washington is considered to be the founding father of the United
States of America. His leadership was pivotal in the development of this
country’s government. He was truly respected by everyone, from lowranking soldiers to feisty public officials. He was a man of great integrity
who was a good listener. After the Revolutionary War, Washington was
the reason that various factions did not splinter into small groups or
nations. He became the United States’ first president because his
leadership was so well suited for the times.
58
Gilbert Stuart /National Gallery of Art/Getty Images
Born into a prosperous Virginia family, he grew up on a large plantation.
His father died when he was 11. Washington received formal schooling for
seven years and then worked as a surveyor. He entered the military at the
age of 20. During the French and Indian War, Washington learned about
the difficulties of battle and experienced both victories and defeats. He
served as commander in chief of the Continental Army from 1775 to 1783.
59
His leadership was instrumental in leading the colonies to victory over
Great Britain in the Revolutionary War. After the war, he retired to farm
for a short period. In 1787, however, his interests in politics and the nation
took him to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, where he was
chosen to preside over the successful creation of the U.S. Constitution.
After the Constitution was ratified, Washington was elected by 100% of
the electoral college as the first president of the United States. Washington
served two terms as president (1789–1793, 1793–1797); although he had
the people’s support, he chose not to serve a third term. He retired to
Mount Vernon in 1797 and died there from pneumonia at the age of 67. At
his funeral, one of his officers, Henry Lee, eulogized him as an American
who was “first in war, first in peace, and first in the heart of his
countrymen.”
Traits and Characteristics
George Washington exhibited many special leadership traits (Brookhiser,
1996; Burns & Dunn, 2004; Fishman, 2001; Higginbotham, 2002).
Researchers identify him as a modest man with great moral character who
demonstrated integrity, virtuousness, and wisdom in his leadership.
Though neither highly educated nor brilliant, he is reported to have read 10
newspapers each day. He was tall, and careful about his appearance. For
much of his life, he kept a daily record of his work. Although reserved, as
a military leader he was brave and tenacious. Rather than use power to his
own ends, he gave up his position as commander in chief after the war.
Washington provided stability, reason, and order after the American
Revolution when the United States was in its formative stages. His
evenness made him predictable to the American people, who considered
him trustworthy. Above all, Washington was a prudent leader who made
sound judgments and provided balance and wisdom to the new
government. Washington was a special leader with many unique talents
who, as Schwartz (1987, p. 147) has suggested, “was ‘great’ because he
was ‘good.’”
60
Walter Stoneman/Stringer/Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Winston Churchill (1874–1965)
Winston Churchill was one of the greatest statesmen and orators of the
20th century. In addition, he was a talented painter and prolific writer; he
received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1953. Churchill served in the
61
military during World War I, became prime minister of Great Britain in
May 1940, and remained in that office through World War II, until 1945. It
was at this time that his masterful leadership was most visible. When the
Germans threatened to invade Britain, Churchill stood strong. He made
many famous speeches that had far-reaching effects on the morale of the
people of Great Britain and the Allied forces. On the home front, he was a
social reformer. He served a second term as prime minister from 1951 to
1955. He died at the age of 90 in 1965.
Traits and Characteristics
Winston Churchill’s leadership was remarkable because it emerged from a
man who was average in many respects and who faced challenges in his
personal life. In his education, he did not stand out as superior to others.
On a societal level, he was a loner who had few friends. On a personal
level, he suffered from bouts of depression throughout his life. Despite
these characteristics, Churchill emerged as a leader because of his other
unique gifts and how he used them (Hayward, 1997; Keegan, 2002;
Sandys & Littman, 2003). A voracious reader, Churchill was plain
speaking, decisive, detail oriented, and informed (Hayward, 1997).
Furthermore, he was very ambitious, but not out of self-interest: He
wanted what was right for others, and he wanted the best for Great Britain.
His most significant talent was his masterful use of language. In his
oratory, the normally plainspoken Churchill used words and imagery in
powerful ways that touched the hearts of many and set the moral climate
of the war (Keegan, 2002). He had the ability to build hope and inspire
others to rise to the challenge. His stoicism and optimism were an
inspiration to his people and all of the Allied forces (Sandys & Littman,
2003).
Mother Teresa (1910–1997)
A Roman Catholic nun considered a saint by many, Mother Teresa
received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979 for her work with the poor and
helpless in Kolkata, India, and throughout the world. Born in Macedonia,
Mother Teresa came from a comfortable background. At the age of 18, she
joined the Catholic Sisters of Loreto order and worked for 17 years as a
high school teacher in Kolkata. Her awareness of poverty in Kolkata
caused her to leave the convent in 1948 to devote herself to working fulltime with the poorest of the poor in the slums of the city. In 1950, Mother
62
Teresa founded a new religious order, the Missionaries of Charity, to care
for the hungry, homeless, unwanted, and unloved.
Bettmann/Contributor/Bettmann/Getty Images
Today, there are more than 1 million workers affiliated with the
Missionaries of Charity in more than 40 countries. The charity provides
help to people who have been hurt by floods, epidemics, famines, and war.
The Missionaries of Charity also operate hospitals, schools, orphanages,
youth centers, shelters for the sick, and hospices. For her humanitarian
work and efforts for peace, Mother Teresa has been recognized with many
awards, including the Pope John XXIII Peace Prize (1971), the Nehru
Award (1972), the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom (1985), and the
Congressional Gold Medal (1994). Although she struggled with
deteriorating health in her later years, Mother Teresa remained actively
involved in her work to the very end. She died at the age of 87 in 1997. In
September 2016, Pope Francis declared Mother Teresa a saint, with the
official name of Saint Teresa of Kolkata. In a statement announcing the
canonization, the Vatican called her a “metaphor for selfless devotion and
holiness” (Lyman, 2016).
63
Traits and Characteristics
Mother Teresa was a simple woman of small stature who dressed in a plain
blue and white sari, and who never owned more than the people she
served. Mirroring her appearance, her mission was simple—to care for the
poor. From her first year on the streets of Kolkata where she tended to one
dying person to her last years when thousands of people were cared for by
the Missionaries of Charity, Mother Teresa stayed focused on her goal.
She was a true civil servant who was simultaneously determined and
fearless, and humble and spiritual. She often listened to the will of God.
When criticized for her stand on abortion and women’s role in the family,
or her approaches to eliminating poverty, Mother Teresa responded with a
strong will; she never wavered in her deep-seated human values. Teaching
by example with few words, she was a role model for others. Clearly,
Mother Teresa was a leader who practiced what she preached (GonzalezBalado, 1997; Sebba, 1997; Spink, 1997; Vardey, 1995).
Bill Gates (1955–)
For many years, William (Bill) H. Gates III, cofounder and chair of
Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest developer of software for
personal computers, was the wealthiest person in the world with assets
estimated at more than $70 billion. A self-made man, Gates began his
interest in computers at the age of 13 when he and a friend developed their
first computer software program. He later attended Harvard University but
left, without graduating, to focus on software development. He cofounded
Microsoft in 1975. Under Gates’s leadership, Microsoft developed the
well-known Microsoft Disk Operating System (MS-DOS), Windows
operating system, and Internet Explorer browser. Microsoft is one of the
fastest-growing and most profitable companies ever established. From the
success of Microsoft, Gates and his wife established the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation in 2000 to reduce inequities and improve lives around
the world. This foundation promotes education, addresses global health
issues (such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis), sponsors libraries,
and supports housing and community initiatives in the Pacific Northwest.
Beginning in 2006, Gates transitioned away from his day-to-day operating
role at Microsoft to spend more time working with his foundation, but he
remained the corporation’s chair. But in February 2014, Gates stepped
down as the company’s board chairman in order to increase his
involvement in the company’s operations, serving in a new role of
64
technology adviser and mentor to the company’s new CEO Satya Nadella.
Gates continues to tackle global challenges as co-chair of the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation, which has become the world’s largest private
charitable foundation.
Yamaguchi Haruyoshi/Contributor/Corbis Historical/Getty Images
Traits and Characteristics
65
Bill Gates is both intelligent and visionary. When he cofounded Microsoft,
he had a vision about how to meet the technological needs of people in the
future, and he hired friends to help him accomplish that vision. Gates is
also task oriented and diligent, often working 12 or more hours a day to
promote his interest in software product development. Furthermore, Gates
is focused and aggressive. When Microsoft was accused by the U.S.
government of antitrust violations, Gates appeared before congressional
hearings and strongly defended his company. When asked about whether
he has a “win at all cost” mentality, he answered that you bring people
together to work on products and make products better, but there is never a
finish line—there are always challenges ahead (Jager & Ortiz, 1997, pp.
151–152). In his personal style, Gates is simple, straightforward,
unpretentious, and altruistic: He has demonstrated a strong concern for the
poor and underserved.
Intelligence in Leadership
Oprah Winfrey (1954–)
An award-winning television talk show host, Oprah Winfrey is one of the
most powerful and influential women in the world. Born in rural
Mississippi into a dysfunctional family, she was raised by her grandmother
until she was 6. Winfrey learned to read at a very early age and skipped
two grades in school. Her adolescent years were difficult: While living in
inner-city Milwaukee with her mother who worked two jobs, Winfrey was
molested by a family member. Despite these experiences, she was an
honors student in high school and received national accolades for her
oratory ability. She received a full scholarship to Tennessee State
University, where she studied communication and worked at a local radio
station. Winfrey’s work in the media eventually led her to Chicago where
she became host of the highly acclaimed Oprah Winfrey Show. In 2007,
Winfrey was the highest-paid entertainer in television, earning an annual
salary estimated at $260 million. She also is an actor, a producer, a book
critic, and a magazine publisher, and, in 2011, left her successful television
show to concentrate on her television network, OWN. For years, Winfrey
had publicly battled her weight, using her struggles as inspiration for her
millions of fans to lead healthier lives. In 2015, Winfrey become a 10%
stockholder and board member of the diet empire Weight Watchers.
Winfrey, who has long shown an interest in health issues and dieting
66
programs, serves as an adviser to the company, using her undeniable clout
to further encourage others to engage in healthier lifestyles.
Frederick M. Brown/Stringer/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty Images
Her total wealth is estimated at more than $3.1 billion. Winfrey is also a
highly regarded philanthropist: Her giving has focused on making a
difference in the lives of the underprivileged and poor. Winfrey has paid
special attention to the needs of people in Africa, raising millions of
67
dollars to help AIDS-affected children there and creating a leadership
academy for girls in a small town near Johannesburg, South Africa.
Traits and Characteristics
Oprah Winfrey’s remarkable journey from rural poverty to influential
world leader can be explained by several of her strengths (Harris &
Watson, 2007; Illouz, 2003; McDonald, 2007). Foremost, Winfrey is an
excellent communicator. Since she was a little girl reciting Bible passages
in church, she has been comfortable in front of an audience. On television,
she is able to talk to millions of people and have each person feel as if she
is talking directly to him or her. Winfrey is also intelligent and well read,
with a strong business sense. She is sincere, determined, and inspirational.
Winfrey has a charismatic style of leadership that enables her to connect
with people. She is spontaneous and expressive, and has a fearless ability
to self-disclose. Because she has “been in the struggle” and survived, she
is seen as a role model. Winfrey has overcome many obstacles in her life
and encourages others to overcome their struggles as well. Her message is
a message of hope.
All of these individuals have exhibited exceptional leadership. While each
of these leaders is unique, together they share many common
characteristics. All are visionary, strong willed, diligent, and inspirational.
As purpose-driven leaders, they are role models and symbols of hope.
Reflecting on the characteristics of these extraordinary leaders will provide
you with a better understanding of the traits that are important for effec...
Purchase answer to see full
attachment