I Need an Excellent Writer to do Philosophy Assignment. Top; notch Work Needed No Grammar Errors 0% Plagiarism Free 0% well formatted work in APA.

User Generated

fgneirfgznex

Humanities

Description

I Need an Excellent Writer to do Philosophy Assignment. Top; notch Work Needed No Grammar Errors 0% Plagiarism Free 0% well formatted work in APA.

high quality original work needed

grammar error free work

make sure you use quotations

it should be 1500 words

use credible sources

keenly read through the instructions on the attachments before starting the work

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Final Essay Instructions Final Essay (30% of overall course grade): This assignment requires you to build on your annotated bibliography and write an essay presenting an argument on a topic you have selected. You must have a clear thesis statement and conclusion with supporting evidence/sources. Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to present an argument in essay format of one of the topics we have covered this term. The topic should be a continuation of your annotated bibliography. Topics may include: animal rights, ecofeminism, virtue ethics and nature, etc. You can discuss your choice of topics with the professor. Audience: This assignment should be directed at your scholarly peers, and you may assume that they have only a casual familiarity with your topic or issue. Essay Length and Format: 8–10 double spaced pages max; use 12-pt Times New Roman font, with 1-inch margins. You will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Spelling and grammar • • • • Use your spell checker. Use your dictionary to make sure words are used correctly. If you aren’t sure, use simpler language. Fancy words don’t count for extra marks. Hint: Have a friend read your work and ask them to mark sentences that are difficult to understand. Maximum of 10 deductions-minus one point for each error Appropriate use of quotes and citations • • • • You must provide a parenthetical citation any time you use ideas that are not your own or when you make claims that are not common knowledge. When quoting material make sure to put direct quotes in “quotes” and include the page number where it occurs in the original source. E.g., (Smith, 2018, p.10). When presenting another author’s idea without a direct quote you must provide a citation, e.g. After all, the causal stuff of brains cannot be ignored if we are assessing the claims of Strong AI (Searle, 1997). Be sure to include proper list of references at the end of the paper. Clear thesis statement (and introduction) and conclusion • Introductions should include a thesis statement (your argument, not the authors’ we have read in class), and should provide a brief map of your paper (what you will say, what you will conclude). 1 • Conclusions should contain a brief summary of the main points of your argument, and should emphasize your conclusion. Depth of argument/analysis • • • • • You must provide a clear argument, and the argumentative statements you make must be supported by the course readings. Support your argument with either direct quotes or a page reference pointing to supporting material in the annotated bibliography/course readings. Clearly define any technical terms you use in your paper. Assume that I have less knowledge than you regarding the topic you are writing about. I highly recommend having a friend you trust read your paper in order to give you an idea of where you need to clarify things. Provide at least one objection to your argument and explain clearly: o (1) how it applies to your argument (which of your premises or conclusions does it undercut?) and, o (2) why you think it is unsuccessful. E.g. “It could be argued that peoples’ consumption of animals, no matter how pervasive a phenomenon it became, would never justify the inclusion of animal meat in the western diet… If true my assertion that…would be problematic… However, it seems that a pervasive phenomenon speaks to the credibility of the claim… As Barnes & Bloor put it “…””, and so on. Clarity/structure of argument • • • • • • • Your paper should be clearly structured and readable from beginning to end. Use paragraphs to separate ideas. Each paragraph should contain ONE main idea/premise/conclusion and the supporting details. Each paragraph should support the overall argument clearly. Use sentences to isolate statements. Avoid run on sentences that contain to many separate ideas. Each sentence should support the main idea of the paragraph. Make it clear when you are considering an objection, e.g. “One possible objection to my argument comes from Searle, who states that…” Make your premises and conclusions clear so the reader knows they have just read a premise or a conclusion. You do not need to use the format of the argument exposition (e.g. P1, P2, C1), but you should use identifying language and clear statements containing single ideas to let the reader know you are asserting something. Accurate use/representation of source materials 2 • • Make sure that when you quote an author, the quote is charitable and accurate. Do not build straw man arguments by misrepresenting an author’s argument. You need to demonstrate that you understood the arguments you are drawing from by ensuring that the quotes you choose really support your claims. This is meant to be a straightforward academic philosophy paper. The point of this paper is for you to make an argument and back it up by referencing the work of experts. You need to describe the authors’ ideas clearly whenever you use them in your argument in order to demonstrate that you read the original arguments in full, that you understood them, and that you understand how they relate to your topic. In order to receive full marks, you only need to reference the course material or material in your annotated bibliography. When you choose to draw from other sources you will need to explain the other material very clearly, and you should assume I have not read it. Rubric CATEGORY A B C D F Accurate use and representatio n of source materials Clearly and accurately identifies and explains the major premises and conclusions Clearly and accurately identifies and explains the major premises and conclusions most of the times Clearly and accurately identifies and explains the major premises and conclusions some of the time Clearly and accurately identifies and explains the major premises and conclusion; rarely Does not clearly and accurately identify and explain the major premises and conclusions Clarity and structure of argument Clear premises and conclusions. Frequently clear premises and conclusions. Somewhat clear premises and conclusions. Rarely clear premises and conclusions. Never has clear premises and conclusions. Frequently has logical and clear sentence and paragraph structure. Sometimes has logical and clear sentence and paragraph structure. Rarely has logical and clear sentence and paragraph structure. Never has logical and clear sentence and paragraph structure. Defines/clarifies key technical terms most of the time and appropriately Defines/clarifies key technical terms some of the time and provides an Defines/clarifie s key technical terms; rarely. Poorly presents an objection to Does not define/clarify key technical terms does not provide an Depth of Argument/An alysis Always has logical and clear sentence and paragraph structure. Defines/clarifies key technical terms and at least one objection to the argument. 3 Full support of argument present develops an objection to the argument. Adequately supports argument objection to the argument at a beginning level. Begins to support argument. the argument. Poor support of argument. objection to the argument. Does not support arguments Clear Thesis Statement Easily identifiable, interesting, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, clear. Promising, but may be unclear or lacking insight or originality. Unclear, buried, poorly articulated, lacking in insight and originality. Difficult to identify, inconsistently maintained, or provides little around which to structure paper. No identifiable thesis or thesis shows lack of effort or comprehension of assignment Use of quotes and citations Citations are formatted and used correctly in the document There are a few formatting and use errors in the document’s citations. There are some formatting and use errors in the document’s citations. There are many and/or frequent formatting and use errors in the document’s citations. There is little or no adherence to format and use in the document. Spelling and grammar No errors 2-3 error 4-7 errors 8-9 errors 10 or more errors Rubrics are subject to minor revisions. Students will be notified of changes. 4
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Surname 1
➢ Introduction
➢ Definition of Animal Cruelty
➢ Different methods of animal cruelty
➢ Ways to prevent animal cruelty
➢ Conclusion


Running head: ANIMAL CRUELTY

1

Animal Cruelty
Author’s name
Institutional Affiliation
Date

ANIMAL CRUELTY

2
Animal Cruelty

Rights represent common codes depending on a particular legal system and ethical
theories. Every living organism has rights, awarded by a society or a system that allocates the
norms and grade the living things. The humane treatment of animals represents a principle tenet
associated with animal welfare movements for the longest period (Facts about Animal Cruelty).
The most significant include the Judeo-Christian doctrines of benevolence, where God creates
every living thing. Therefore, it is everyone’s obligation to have the moral virtue of kindness and
humanity and stay away from the inhuman and social evil act, which is linked to immoral
behaviors (Facts about Animal Cruelty). Despite the validity of this ethic principle, it is limited
because of the tendency of accepting any form of animal exploitation, as long as humane
procedures are adhered to the end.
For instance, one wonders if the instant killing and trap of whales, as well as far-bearing
mammals is regarded as morally upright. Within the reduced tenet of human beings showing
kindness towards animals, it seems as a moral obligation. The moral obligation is a primary goal
supported by the animal welfare movements aimed towards eliminating suffering among animal
species, by ending human exploitation. However, the goal remains narrow-sighted, because of
the practical difficulties to proof animal suffering (Facts about Animal Cruelty). It is difficult to
proof psychological cruelty on animals, and there is a belief that it is possible to eliminate animal
suffering in a conceivable manner (Girjen, 2018) For instance, when handling the confined farm
animals, use of tranquilizers or conducting brain surgery could seem immorally wrong, but
helpful to enhance the health of the animals.
Another example creating controversy includes either preparing a goose as a meal,
through selective partial destruction or stimulating its brain leading to hypertrophy of the liver to

ANIMAL CRUELTY

3

support liver pate trade to eliminate suffering. Despite the method, the goose faces harm, hence it
could be safe to state that no matter the method, the end includes harming and killing the goose.
Accordingly, when farmers feed the broiler chicken and it ends up jeopardizing its health or raise
a laboratory animal in a zoo or restricted environment, the animals are denied their freedom to
movement, which causes harm (Girjen, 2018). More so, the treatments expose the animals to
stressful situations and diseases. According to the philosophers promoting animal rights, it
amounts to rights violation, regardless to whether suffering occurs in a scientifically proven
environment.
Animal suffering represents one aspect of animal exploitation, but it paints a picture that
eliminating animal suffering remains a limited horizon. Therefore, majority of human movement
groups have expanded their mission, vision and objectives to incorporate animal right
philosophical and ecological principles into learning, legislative and political events. It is a
reflection that there is need to develop an in-depth comprehension of animal activities, their nonvisual utterances, and viewing them as companions and natural creatures to be appreciated as
part of the natural ecosystem (Facts about Animal Cruelty). This could help enhance animal
career under the guidance of humane stewardship and dominion of animal research, farmers and
all individuals whose livelihoods rely on animal exploitation as the only way to benefit the
society.
Girjen (2018) asserts that when animal connection is viewed as an informed empathy, far
from a pure Cartesian , utilitarian or esthetic attitude, then there is a possibility of societal and
intrinsic worthiness of animals. After establishing the animal connection, the society is able to
develop reverence, recognizing animal rights through a deeper change of attitude towards
animals. Animals are multicellular organisms that creates the biological kingdom of Animalia.

ANIMAL CRUELTY

4

Apart from animals being living things, they also use oxygen for breathing and rely on organic
materials...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags