HIST101 Fraser Valley Red River Settlement & Colombia Gold Rush Discussion

User Generated

FHXUENW

Writing

HIST101

Description

Answer 3 three questions.....unlike the precis answer in 200- words.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

History 101: winter 2019. Take home portion of final exam Please write an answer to one of the questions below. Target length c. 200-250 words (unlike the précis assignment, the specified length is just a rough guideline). Value: 30 % of your final exam mark. You may submit your answer in Blackboard at any time up to the end of the day (11:59) Friday April 26. (Please do not email the assignment.) Submit a Word document and label your submission according to the following model: Smith, John take home final The questions are based on the online lecture material “The West” which can be viewed in Blackboard. If you wish, you may also use the textbook material to inform your answer. You do not need to do any research outside these sources; the goal is to show your engagement with the course material. 1. Were tensions in Red River settlement in the first two decades of the nineteenth century primarily the product of ethnic differences or commercial competition? Explain your answer. 2. In what ways did the Metis challenge the Hudson’s Bay Company monopoly in Rupert’s Land in the first half of the nineteenth century? What were the short and long term consequences of this challenge? 3. What challenges did the 1858 British Columbia gold rush pose for Britain and how successfully did they respond to them?
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Your Assignment is complete

Running Head: THE RED RIVER SETTLEMENT AND COLOMBIA GOLD RUSH

The Red River Settlement and Colombia Gold Rush
Students’ Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

THE RED RIVER SENTLEMENT AND COLOMBIA GOLD RUSH

2

Question 1.
Chaos and conflicts in the red river in the 19th century was exclusively due to
commercial interests and competition between Selkirk, Hudson’s Bay, and Montreal traders.
Selkirk battled with the indigenous red river companies over settlement and fur production. This
resulted to a big rift among them.
Somewhere in the range of 1801 and 1805 both Hudson's sound and the northwest
organization had increased more assets in the hidden exchange to which both needed to pick up
imposing business model intensity of the North American Fur Trade (Esau, 2016). The fracture
achieved its pinnacle seeing the two organizations utilizing a higher number of assets on
outcompeting each other than were consumed on the investigation of new hide grounds.
The Hudson organization was made independent on a beneficial hide exchange by the
foundation of a rural state, a factor that the northwestern basically couldn't contend. The red
waterway initia...


Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags