Please review the Essay Writing module before completing beginning this assignment.Please write an essay in response to this assignment and review Chapter 24Global Industries Corporation owns assets in Kazakhstan, a country in Asia. The government of Kazakhstan wants to nationalize all assets owned by foreign firms and investors. Can it at least obtain payment for the assets?Please research this assignment on the Internet.Introduction:Define “nationalization”International investment - risksDefine eminent domainMain Section - Historical Perspective:Nationalization by Hugo Chavez in VenezuelaNationalization in the U.S.Possible nationalisation by Greece’s new leftist governmentConclusion:International Law - Eminent Domain???Will Global receive compensation?

Scenario Jed, Herman, and Jane live in Washington, D.C. Jed and Jane entered the local bank and took $65,000. Jed and Herman both used shotguns during the robbery, though no one was hurt. Jane drove the getaway vehicle. Two hours later, as they headed toward the Canadian border, they were stopped by the police for speeding and taken into custody. The police determined that Jed and Jane matched the eyewitness descriptions of the robbers. Jane confessed their bank robbery scheme. Jed and Herman denied their involvement. The police only recovered $25,000 in cash, but were unable to determine if the recovered money was taken from the bank. The police determined that Jed was a convicted felon at the time of the armed bank robbery. The local police and FBI were involved in the investigation. The defense attorneys for each defendant (Jed, Herman, Jane) request a continuance for four months to sift through the evidence. The prosecution objects and argues that the delay would significantly clog the court’s already heavy workload. In the alternative, the prosecution argues that if the court grants a continuance, then the prosecution should be allowed to prolong turning over the remaining discovery. The defense attorneys object and argue that this hinders their effective representation of their clients and would hinder a prompt resolution. The defense attorneys further argue that their clients deserve a well prepared and thorough defense. The judge currently has trials blocked over the next 10 months and wants to try the case now. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:II. Judicial Administration A. Analyze how federal, state, and local courts calendar and docket cases. Are these processes effective in promoting efficiency? Defend your response. B. Describe how the calendaring and continuance of this scenario would be handled differently in the state system versus the federal system. Defend your response. C. Identify the key role within federal and state judicial systems that most impacts process. How does this role aid in creating and maintaining an efficient and effective judicial process? F. Determine the impact of venue on process efficiency in this scenario. Defend your response. G. Explain how a four month continuance affects the efficiency of any court under the circumstances presented in the scenario. Defend your response.

Miranda and Admissibility of StatementsCompetencies Addressed in This AssignmentCompetency 1: Articulate how the rules of criminal procedure apply to a criminal justice practitioner.Competency 2: Illustrate ethical compliance with criminal procedure from a criminal justice practitioner perspective.Competency 4: Specify how the procedural rules apply to the admission of evidence in criminal casesCompetency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.IntroductionFor a suspect's statements to be admissible in court, he or she must meet certain criteria. As you have learned from the Miranda case, in that instance, the Court rejected voluntariness of statements as the sole test for admissibility. Although voluntariness is still required, it is now assumed if three questions can be answered in the affirmative. First, it must be shown that the Miranda warning was given. Second, if it was given, it will be necessary to determine whether there was a waiver. Finally, if there was a waiver, there must be evidence that the waiver was intelligent and voluntary. There are certainly other circumstances when confessions may be admissible when made before Miranda warning is given, which makes this area of law very intricate and fact-based.You will use the Miranda and Admissibility Statements media as the foundation for your assignment.OverviewMiranda v. Arizona changed the rules on admissibility from voluntariness to the three-questions test. For this assignment, prepare a three-page paper citing a minimum of two academically verified references.In your paper:Determine whether you can question the occupants of the vehicle in the scenario at the scene without Miranda warning. (Question 1: Was Miranda warning given?)Analyze, after the Miranda warning was given, whether there was a waiver. (Question 2: If Miranda warning was given, was there a waiver?)Explore whether, assuming there was a waiver by the suspects, the waiver was intelligent and voluntary. (Question 3: If there was a waiver, was it intelligent and voluntary?)Explain how Miranda changed the way police officers perform their jobs.Be sure to review the Miranda and Admissibility of Statements Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the criteria for this assignment.RequirementsYour paper should meet the following requirements:Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.References: A minimum of two references.APA format: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.Length of paper: Three pages, not including the title page and the references page.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.