NUR699 Evidence Based Practice Proposal Section C Literature Support

User Generated

wfvzba7785

Writing

NUR699

Description

To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the "Section B: Problem Description" assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists," available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.

Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template," available in the textbook appendix. Use the "Evaluation Table Template" as an adaptable template.

Write a narrative of 750‐1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:

  1. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
  2. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
  3. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer‐reviewed professional journal articles.

Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine "Section C: Literature Support" for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code NUR-699 Class Code NUR-699-O501 Criteria Percentage Literature Support Summarize the research support for the problem 100.0% and proposed solution of the project. Describe the search method. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. 100.0% Total Weightage 100% Evidence-Based Practice Proposal - Section C: Literature Support Unsatisfactory (0.00%) The individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is listed without an in-depth explanation. The search method data are listed without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or is outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed 60.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) The individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is listed without an in-depth explanation. The search method data are listed and identify some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. The research strengths and limitations are ignored or Satisfactory (88.00%) A basic overview of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided. Any rationale, details, and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research are minimally included. The search method data are listed and identify some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, Good (92.00%) A complete summary of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided in a concise manner. The validity of the internal and external research is described while providing some detailed rationale. The search method is described and identifies the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of Excellent (100.00%) Comments A detailed summary of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided and emphasizes the essential components. The validity of the internal and external research is described in-depth. The search method is described and identifies the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: LITERATURE SUPPORT: INADEQUATE QUALITY OF CARE

Literature Support-Inadequate Quality of Care
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

1

LITERATURE SUPPORT: INADEQUATE QUALITY OF CARE
2
Literature Support-Inadequate Quality of Care
The literature search refers to evidence-based obtained when the investigator focuses on
in-depth analysis of the subject to establish the current gap in knowledge. Further, the literature
review allows the researcher to understand the implication of the inadequate quality of care in
nursing practice in the United. The review of the relevant sources of information to the topic
help in exploring to create a summary and critical appraisal of the problem of the research being
investigated. The literature support is crucial for developing an understanding issue exists in
nursing practice to synthesize what is already known about the problem of inadequate quality of
care. More so, the knowledge gained from the literature review is vital for identification of gap
and impacts of the research on the insufficient quality of care in the health facility (Mansukhani
et al., 2015).
The comprehensive electronic search of the various source was completed using multiple
databases such as MEDINE, CINAHL, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials and Ovid. During the search
process, the researcher included English-only articles published between 2014 and 2019. The
keyword used in the search were quality of care in nursing, nursing practice, adequate quality of
care, communication and health care organization culture. More so, search results revealed 45
publications. The research screened and found 12 studies were relevant to the quality of...


Anonymous
Great content here. Definitely a returning customer.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags