Management help needed with an In-Depth Audience Analysis

Nov 11th, 2015
FratBro23
Category:
Management
Price: $30 USD

Question description

Locate your local Chamber of Commerce’s community profile ( Virginia state in my Case) either online or in printed material that describes your local community. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper on the following:

  • Illustrate the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.
  • Create your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.
  • Give two recommendations that would improve the message, based on audience analysis.
  • Provide your rationale as to why your version would be better than the original.
  The format of the paper is to be as follows:
  • Typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format, Microsoft Word document.
  • Use headers for each of the subjects being covered, followed by your response.
  • In addition to the three to four (3-4) pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.
Note: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.

The Grading rubric.

Points: 240

Assignment 2: In-Depth Audience Analysis

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Illustrate the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely illustrated the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.

Partially illustrated the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.

Satisfactorily illustrated the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.

Thoroughly illustrated the message’s view of the audience and stakeholders based on the written profile.

2. Create your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.

Partially created your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.

Satisfactorily

created your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.

Thoroughly

created your own analysis of the community stakeholders and audience using the demographics, geographics, psychographics, sociographics, usergraphics, and webographics described in this chapter.

3. Give two recommendations that would improve the message, based on audience analysis.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely gave two recommendations that would improve their message, based on audience analysis.

Partially gave two recommendations that would improve their message, based on audience analysis.

Satisfactorily

gave two recommendations that would improve their message, based on audience analysis.

Thoroughly gave two recommendations that would improve their message, based on audience analysis.

4. Provide your rationale as to why your version would be better than the original.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided your rationale as to why this version would be better than the original.

Partially provided rationale as to why this version would be better than the original.

Satisfactorily provided rationale as to why this version would be better than the original.

Thoroughly provided rationale as to why this version would be better than the original.

5. Clarity

Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized.

(Major issues)

Explanations generally unclear and not well organized.

(Many issues)

Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)

Explanations very clear and well organized.

(Added helpful details.)

6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage.

Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues)

Had 6 – 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues)

Had 4 – 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues)

Had 0 – 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage.



Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: Carnegie Mellon University
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
ddg82
Dec 7th, 2016
" Thanks, good work "
kenmwao2
Nov 23rd, 2016
" Solid work, thanks. "
tinytim47
Nov 23rd, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
jestin7
Nov 14th, 2016
" This tutor is great! "
lilmoe415
Nov 1st, 2016
" Thank you, Thank you, for top quality work, this is your guy!! "
dontuwannaknow
Oct 9th, 2016
" Excellent work as always thanks so much "
thargrow
Sep 30th, 2016
" Very Satisfied. "
SjSurvivor143
Sep 26th, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1824 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors