The Assingment questions are in PDF that I have attached.Assignment 3: Final Case Study focusing on Four Recruitment ScenariosThis assignment will be due at the end of week 8. INSTRUCTIONS:Read the entire case study carefully and then respond to all questions in each of the four scenarios.Develop each answer to the fullest extent possible, including citations from outside resources, where applicable, to support your arguments.Submit your assignment as a separate MS Word document in your assignments folder. Do not type your answers into the case study document.Include a Cover Page with Name, Date, and Title of Assignment.Do not include the original question. Use the following format: Scenario 1: question 1, etc. Each response should be written in complete sentences, double-spaced and spell-checked. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins on all sides.Include page numbers according to APA formatting guidelines.Include citations in APA format at the end of each answer.You must submit to the assignment link by the due date (final day of class). A missing assignment will be assigned a grade of 0.Rubric:CriteriaGrade A5 pointsGrade B4.25 pointsGrade C3.75 pointsGrade D3.25 pointsGrade F-0 pointsCompletenessComplete in all respects; reflects all requirements. Response to each question is thorough and detailed and all parts of questions are answered.Complete in most respects. All questions are answered, and all parts of each question are answered.All questions are answered but responses may need clarification or more explanation of some aspects of the question.Did not respond to every question and/or all parts of the questions.Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements.Identification, analysis and evaluation of issues/challengesPresents a thorough analysis of all issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate and strong connections between the issues identified and the course materials. Adds relevant support and evidence to demonstrate critical thinking.Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the course materials that demonstrates critical thinking.Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and the course materials. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence.Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified in the case scenarios. Makes little or no relevant connection between the issues identified and the course materials. Supports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence.Analysis and/or diagnosis of case scenario issues is missing. Rationale and or supporting evidence is absent or not relevant.Development of strategy/plan and actions/solutions.Detailed solutions, strategies or plans of action are proposed. Solutions, strategies, or action plans are realistic and contain thorough and well-reasoned justifications. Shows connection to course materials.In most instances, proposed solutions, strategies, or action plans are feasible, and based on well-reasoned justifications. They generally address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios. There is some use of course materials to support solutions.Some of the proposed solutions, strategies, or action plans are feasible, justified and address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios.Infeasible solutions, strategies or actions are proposed. They are not supported, or do not address the key issues and problems in the case scenarios.Solutions, strategies, or action plans are incomplete or missing for most or all the case scenarios. Writing Mechanics and use of language.Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling. No errors found. No jargon used.Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. One to three errors found.Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found.Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over ten errors found.Completely missing or incorrect.APA Guidelines for in-text citations and ReferencesThe paper correctly cites in-text and lists at least three course resources. All references are cited and all citations are referenced.The majority of in-text citations and the references are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases, or there is a mismatch between a citation and a reference. Uses a minimum of three resources from course materials.References are cited but incorrectly or does not use three resources from course materials. Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; does not use sufficient resources.Completely missing or incorrect.Overall ScoreGrade A22.5 or moreGrade B20 or moreGrade C17.5 or moreGrade D15 or moreGrade F0 or more

Instructions For this assignment, you will complete a research paper on The Stroop Effect and selective attention. The Stroop Effect is a phenomenon that occurs with the Stroop Task, a test that looks at what happens when we are asked to perform an ordinary task (such as reading or identifying  a list of colors) when there is some sort of visual interference. You are acting like you are the researcher who conducted this study! However, you do not have to actually collect the data – I already have that for you. In order to understand how the study works and how data was collected, you will need to participate in an online experiment on the Stroop Effect located within the "psychology learning tools". Remember that you did this earlier in the class! Once you have completed the experiment you will need to analyze data (remember that I will give you data) and write a lab report (7- 10 pages - this page count does not include the title page or references) in APA style consisting of the following sections: Title Page Abstract Introduction Method Results Discussion References (More information on each section is located below) Here is the data file: DATA Remember that you were given additional details in the Hypothesis discussion. You will write the report as if you were the researcher conducting the experiment. You have some options in your research question for this project. The data you are given includes the gender and age of the participants as well as two columns of results data (reading the words and saying the colors). If you have a particular interest and want to modify the data, you have that choice. We will talk about this as you work on your hypothesis. You should try to use as much of your data as possible. Do not discard data unless there is a really good reason to do so. Careful attention must be paid to APA Style as it represents a significant portion of your grade for the paper and is an intended learning outcome for the course. At the end of the term, you will submit your completed paper to your assignment folder. Here is the grading rubric for the paper: Rubric Main components on your research paper Title page – Make sure that the main points of a title page are included. Abstract – This is a well written summary of your paper. A reader should be able to get a clear picture of your paper based on the abstract. Include everything from a quick introduction of the topic to a sentence that implies that you will discuss results and implications. Introduction – This is so much more than a summary of your paper and should not be treated that way. For this paper, your introduction should be 2-3 pages of double spaced writing. Start by introducing your topic in general. Then you should discuss research from relevant published studies. Most, if not all, of your 8 references from peer reviewed sources will be cited in this section. Discussing these studies are important as they help provide a rationale for your study. Give that rationale next. Finish by clearly stating your hypothesis.      Here is an article to get you started. Remember that this website isn’t the source for this article. You need to locate and cite the original source! Methods – Split this section into participants, materials and procedures subsections. You know the gender and age of all of your participants. You are welcome to include other demographic or recruiting information as it helps you with your study. Try the study here so you can adequately write about the procedures. Results – Use the data I provided to calculate your results. Remember that your hypothesis drives your statistics. Think about what statistics you need to include to test your hypothesis. Write out all of your results even if you are including them in a table. Don’t forget to include a chart or table! Discussion – This is the best section because it is finally time to talk about what YOU think. After restating your results, talk about what they mean. What are the implications of your findings? Why are they important? For instance, why should we care that one gender is better at this than the other or that there aren’t gender differences for this study? After that, talk about the limitations to your study and give specific ideas for future research. Hypothesis Many studies have been conducted to test the comparability of men and women. Most of them found that women are twice likely to suffer from clinical symptoms of depression as men. However, a few of them focused on determining whether or not women use cognitive emotion strategies more than women when they experience life stress. My research idea is whether or not gender correlates with the clinical symptoms of depression to develop the right interventions to address depression for both men (1) and women (2). Hypothesis: it is hypothesized that women use cognitive emotion regulation strategies more than men when they experience life stress. I will utilize 50 men and 80 women ranging from age ranging from 18 to 65 years old. I will use the CERQ to assess participants' perceptions of stressful life events and a checklist to collect their adverse life events. Using these methods is to control the number of negative life events when studying the correlation between gender and symptoms of clinical depression. Finally, I will use the multivariate analysis of variance to measure the life events of both males and females.  Hypothesis Feedback Good idea, you do need to incorporate the Stroop task here so you could look at how depression causes different reaction times (perhaps slowed due to depressed cognition).