As with the previous week’s Discussion, this Discussion assists in solidifying your understanding of statistical testing by engaging in some data analysis. This week you will once again work with a real, secondary dataset to construct a research question, perform categorical data analysis that answers the question, and interpret the results. Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will post your response to the hypothesis test, along with the results. Be sure and remember that the goal is to obtain constructive feedback to improve the research and its interpretation, so please view this as an opportunity to learn from one another. To prepare for this Discussion: Review Chapters 10 and 11 of the Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero course text and the media program found in this week’s Learning Resources related to bivariate categorical tests. Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered using categorical analysis. By Day 3 Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following: Include the General Social Survey Dataset’s mean of Age to verify the dataset you used. What is your research question? What is the null hypothesis for your question? What research design would align with this question? What dependent variable was used and how is it measured? What independent variable is used and how is it measured? If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect? Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question. References:Wagner, III, W. E. (2020). Using IBM® SPSS® statistics for research methods and social science statistics (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Chapter 7, "Cross-Tabulation and Measures of Association for Nominal and Ordinal Variables"Chapter 11, "Editing Output" (previously read in Week 2, 3, 4, 5. 6, 7, and 8)Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Leon-Guerrero, A., & Davis, G. (2020). Social statistics for a diverse society (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Chapter 9, “Bivariate Tables” (pp. 281-325)Chapter 10, “The Chi-Square Test and Measures of Association” (pp. 327-373)

Share your Rogerian Argument field test. Proceed in this order:1. First, what was the occasion of the disagreement (context, background)?2. Second, describe how you employed these four steps of Rogerian argument with your "adversary" (I prefer the term "partner"). Again, here are the steps you must follow during your conversation with the person:a. Summarize the grievance between you and your partner.b. State your partner's position. Make sure he or she agrees that you've stated correctly his/her position.c. Grant the validity of his or her position.d. Show how his or her position will be improved if he or she also accepts your position.3. Finally, how did your partner in the discussion respond? Was the grievance resolved, stayed same, escalated? For full points, follow the directions above and write clear, grammatically correct sentences, and then reply meaningfully to at least two classmatesLearning outcomes: Demonstrate ability to apply critical thinking and analysis. Use effective communication and interpersonal skills.Rogerian field test rubric/3 one grammatically correct, developed post relaying the four steps and outcome/2 two meaningful, grammatically correct replies to classmates and/or Prof. Davis/5 TOTALSee the Rogerian model below.Table shows fallaciesambiguitydivisioncompositionequivocationnon sequiturdistorting the factspost hoc ergo propter hocmany questionshasty generalizationslippery slopeparade of horrorsfalse analogystraw manspecial pleadingbegging the questionfalse dichotomyoversimplificationred herringtu quoquegeneticpoisoning the wellappeal to ignoranceappeal to authorityappeal to feardeath by a thousand qualificationsprotecting the hypothesisor any other fallacy in the lecture notes or readings!1. Pick one of these fallacies or any other (try to pick one different from your classmates') and write a brief example of it and a brief explanation of its fallaciousness. Your sentence should have a false premise, factual error, or logical inconsistency making it invalid or unsound.Example 1:The governor was an action movie star, all brawn and no brains. How can we expect him to lead?--> This is an ad hominem fallacy because it impugns a person's character ("no brains") without any evidence while also associating that purported trait with an unrelated attribute (being unable to lead).2. Create either an unsound or a sound syllogism based on anything you want. An unsound syllogism must be logically invalid, factually untrue, or both. A sound syllogism must be both logically valid and true. After you write your unsound or sound syllogism, state why the conclusion, major/minor premises, facts, etc., are flawed or flawless.Example 2:I'm opting to write an unsound syllogism here...Davis is a sub-par rhythm guitarist.Davis is an English teacher.Therefore, all English teachers are sub-par rhythm guitarists.--> Untrue factually about Davis :) Moreover, opinions can't be proved. This is also invalid logically, as it commits the fallacy of composition wherein something true of one thing is spuriously applied to all similar things. Therefore, this syllogism is "unsound."3. What's a real world example of a time when you've seen ethos, pathos, and logos in effect at the same event or location? Think politics, interviews, the mall... Share your example with the class.For full points, respond meaningfully and grammatically to the three prompts. You are not required to reply to classmates, though you may

In chapter one, Dolgin, (2018), our textbook’s author, outlines many changes that have occurred to bring about the evolution of our society. Discuss this evolution in your post this week. What do you think about how this evolution has brought about change to adolescents in our society, and/or maybe in your own life? Dolgin, K. (2018). The adolescent: Development, relationships, and culture. (14th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Here is an interesting article that also discusses our topic this week: