Course Code NUR-699 Class Code NUR-699-O501 Criteria Change Model Percentage 100.0% Apply a change model to the implementation plan. Carry the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model. 100.0% Total Weightage 100% Evidence-Based Practice Proposal - Section E: Change Model Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Implementation plan is loosely connected to a change model. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are 60.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Implementation plan is loosely connected to the chosen change model. Identification, interpretation, and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and/or may be ambiguous at times. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large Satisfactory (88.00%) Interpretation and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and may be ambiguous at times. A basic description of the implementation plan through the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model is provided. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply Good (92.00%) Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. A detailed outline of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model is provided. An individual interpretation on the effectiveness of the model in relation to the implementation Excellent (100.00%) Comments Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. A detailed descriptive narrative of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps is provided, as is a solid interpretation of the change model in relation to the implementation plan. Appropriate evaluation of the Points Earned Course Code NUR-699 Class Code NUR-699-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Setting and Subjects 5.0% Timeline 5.0% Solution Process and Resources 15.0% Solution methods and instruments 10.0% Data Collection and Management 20.0% Budget 10.0% Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Evidence-Based Practice Proposal - Section F: Implementation Plan No Submissions (71.00%) None None None None None None None None None None None None 60.0 Unsatisfactory (75.00%) Does not fully describe the organizational setting and/or access to potential subjects. Information is ambiguous and leaves the audience questioning. Presents inadequate organization and/or development of the amount of time needed to complete the project. Gives vague and/or incomplete description of the human, fiscal, and other resources and process for delivering the (intervention) solution. More than one major component of the criteria is missing. Gives vague and/or incomplete the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Presents inadequate data collection and management system. The major points of the data analysis and interpretation process are ambiguous or missing. No strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges have been presented. Significant information is missing from the budget or the budget is not provided. Does not clearly specify in the budget how funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are unrelated to the implementation of the project. Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation lacks critical data. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Presents some characteristics of the organizational setting but leaves essential data out. Outlines the access to potential subjects but the information is not developed or comprehensive A basic timeline is present without detail. Insufficient details are provided. One of the following may be missing or inadequate: Lists the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Identifies with minimal detail the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Outlines the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Lists the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Comprehensive alignment and details are missing. Minimal details are present. A limited data collection and management system is described. One of the following is inadequate or missing: Basic outline of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process is present. Lists strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Some examples and details are used. Presents a broad general explanation of the budget. Projected costs in the budget do not reflect realistic amounts for implementing the project. At least half of the criteria below is present: Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is minimal. Details are lacking. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (88.00%) Lists the characteristics of the organizational setting and outlines the access to potential subjects. Minimal use of examples and details is present. An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the project is present but may be inconsistent. Some facts are detailed while a few are missing. Lists the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Identifies with minimal detail the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Outlines the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Provides some detail although limited. Presents a general description of the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Minimal details are present. A limited data collection and management system is described. Basic outline of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process is present. Lists strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Some examples and details are used. Addresses most areas of the budget, but lacks some details. Gives a general explanation in the budget narrative of how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget do not reflect realistic amounts for implementing the project. The majority of the criteria below is present: Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not Surface level description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (92.00%) Presents a detailed outline of the organizational setting and access to potential subjects. Examples are provided. An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the project is present. Important components are give adequate attention and detail. Presents a detailed outline of the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Supplies the rationale for any clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Explains the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Information is accurate, appropriate, and integrated effectively. Provides a clear, specific outline of how/why/which methods and instruments are to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides additional information on instrument strengths and weaknesses. An adequate data collection and management system is outlined with some detail. Presents detailed description of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process. Outlines appropriate strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Examples and details are used throughout. Contains a comprehensive outline of the budget information for the entire project. Explains how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are reasonable. Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, Presents direct, competent, and appropriate analysis of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation. Outlines in detail if goals were met, effectiveness and quality of the solution, and further recommendations. Provides examples and details. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) Presents a full description of the organizational setting and access to potential subjects. Examples and details are indepth and expanded upon. Effective organization contributes to the full development and presentation of the amount of time needed to complete the project. Essential components within the project are specified. Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Presents specific detail and rationale for any clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Explains the process for delivering the (intervention) solution, outlining each step. Demonstrates an Provides a clear, specific description of how/why/which methods and instruments are to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides additional information on possible alternative methods as well as instrument strengths and weaknesses. Presents a comprehensive detailed outline of the data collection plan. Describes in-depth how the data management will be maintained Thoroughly describes the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process. Formulates appropriate strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Contains complete budget information for the entire project. Explains in detail how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are reasonable Provides detailed and convincing budget narrative justifying costs. Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian Comments Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation. Supports rationale. Describes in detail if goals were met, effectiveness and quality of the solution, and further recommendations. Provides examples and details throughout. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned 
Purchase answer to see full attachment