Description
Compare the original Broadway cast recordings of Hair and Rent.
Both musicals were heralded by critics as breakthroughs in the form as well as milestones in connecting current musical trends.
Hair, produced in 1969, and Rent, in 1996, are both rock musicals that used current musical trends to bring in younger audiences to the musical form. Understanding that each show is a relic of its time; which is superior?
Avoid any opinion that incorporates personal experience (example I saw "Rent" or the revival of "Hair") simply listen to the recordings of each as a capsule of its era, and then offer an opinion.
You must also respond to one point related to the person who posted before you. When responding on discussion postings please be aware of how a tone can be misinterpreted by other readers. So please respect your fellow virtual class members when posting your responses. All discussion postings must respond to one point from the post before it AND offer at least one new detail in your posting.
Your post should be at least 300 words.
Rubrics are attached below.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer

Attached is the complete work. Feel free to ask for any corrections or clarifications.
Surname 1
Name
Course
Professor
May 22, 2019
Hair and Rent
Hair is a truly interesting and inspiring musical that also acts as a cultural and social
phenomenon. It is evident that the music was a product of its time as provides a reflection of the
socio-political climate during that era. The issues mentioned ...
