OutcomesDevelops clear cogent analyses and convincing arguments about rhetorical choicesIdentifies and articulates genre expectations, situating the text at hand within a largerconversation in a particular rhetorical situation, with a particular audienceSelects credible and pertinent material from readings and outside texts to support a point or argument as well as illustrates awareness of viewpoints and competing argumentsSituates, integrates, and contextualizes different types of evidence effectively whiledistinguishing the writer’s voice from those of sources.Demonstrates effective organization and style – for a particular purpose, within aparticular genre, to a particular audienceDevelops understanding of and mastery of rhetorical choices within genreconventions, and develops an awareness of how writers must make careful decisionsbased on purpose, audience and argument to execute project/writing professionally across writing situationsRewrites and edits language, style, tone, and sentence structure according to genreand audience expectationsPractices applying citation conventions systematically in their own workPlans and executes a revision process that does not rely only on direction from theinstructor, developing ownership of both process and product to revise purposefullyAssignmentConsider this assignment an opportunity to further explore and expand a line of analysis that you began with your Critical Reading exercises and then develop that analysis into a more complete and complex argument. You will now write a more expansive rhetorical analysis of your primary text. Your rhetorical analysis can delve into message, audience, rhetor, historical and/or social context or even a combination of these aspects.Include secondary sources to strengthen your argument as part of the academic discourse community. Show that you can situate and integrate credible sources into your argument so that it exists as part of an ongoing dialogue among multiple parties involving the text being analyzed. Your task is not to only restate what these sources have said, but to engage and provide insightful responses as a member of this academic discourse community.Your instructor may have some other requirements to include in the focus of your essay.Basic requirementsLength: 1200-1800 words, typed, double-spaced, and presented in MLA format.A minimum of three (3) sources, including the primary text being analyzed, must be used to develop the essay. A works cited will be required as part of the final draft.Process work must be submitted to your instructor in order for the final draft to be graded.You should analysis “the ones who walk away from the omelas"here is my first draft, you need to edit this draft and add one more pageshttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ursula-k-l...

Describe the role of organizational development in contemporary organizations. How does organizational development help organizations prepare for or implement change? Provide an example from your organization.