Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Section G Evaluation of Process Essay

Content Type

User Generated

User

synzrvfonpx

Subject

Health Medical

Description

Develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence?based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.

Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.

Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
Describe implications for practice and future research.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
RUBRIC ATTACHED ,REQUIRE 5 REFERENCE WITH CITATIONS

please refer to previous work if required

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/12676846/evidence-based-practice-proposal-section-c-literature-support-1

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/12537200/evidence-based-practice-proposal-1

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/12264457/benchmark-change-initiative-implementation-evaluation-and-sustainability-3

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/12816916/evidence-based-practice-proposal-section-d-solution-description-3

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/12932371/evidence-based-practice-proposal-section-e-change-model-1

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code NUR-699 Class Code NUR-699-O501 Criteria Percentage Evaluation 100.0% Develop an evaluation plan. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data, the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives were achieved, and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based 100.0% Total Weightage 100% Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Evaluation plan presents the method used in the measurement of the outcomes but does not align the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. 60.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Evaluation plan presents the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. The information presented is ambiguous. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. A lack of comprehension is Satisfactory (88.00%) Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented may lack cohesiveness and details. Possible project modifications when outcomes do not provide expected results are listed. The implications for practice and future Good (92.00%) Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. Validity, reliability, and applicability are briefly addressed. Strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results are outlined. Implications for practice and future research are Excellent (100.00%) Comments Evaluation plan presents the rationale and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented is aligned, comprehensive, and addresses validity, reliability, and applicability. The plan formulates clear and precise strategies for project modification when outcomes do not Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer:

2 pages

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Process Evaluation- Outline
Thesis Statement: Influenza vaccination and its effects to 35 year olds and above will be
monitored through a review of cases of influenza and also number of people who volunteer for
the vaccines.
I. Introduction
II. Methods
III. Validity, reliability, applicability
IV. Rationale
V. Outcomes
VI. Implications

Running head: PROCESS EVALUATION

1

Process Evaluation
Name
Institution

PROCESS EVALUATION

2
Process Evaluation

Influenza vaccination and its effects to 35 year olds and above will be monitored through
a review of cases of influenza and also number of people who volunteer for the vaccines. Based
on these objectives, data collection for an evaluation of outcomes will mainly be based on the
number of people who volunteer for flu vaccinations and also the changes in flu infections as
associated with change in vaccination behavior. Another qualitative outcome that will be
reviewed is the changes in attitudes towards adult influenza vaccination.
The first evaluation method will be an analysis of the vaccination rates of adults 35 years
and above in the hospital. According to Wilson et al. (2017), an evaluation of statistical evidence
against the clinical significance is required in such a case. Therefore, t...