Progress CheckUse this activity to assess whether you and your peers can: Use an applet to generate random samples along with their 95% confidence intervals. Interpret the results.Learn by DoingUse the rubric at the bottom of this page as a guide for completing this assignment.DirectionsSubmit your work:Commit a good-faith effort to address all items in the Prompt section below. Please be sure to number your responses.Complete your assigned peer reviews:After you submit your initial good-faith attempt, continue to the ANSWER(S) page and review your instructor's response. But please do not submit your corrected work yet.Within three days after the due date, return to this assignment and complete your assigned peer reviews (directions (Links to an external site.)).Submit your corrected work:We all learn from mistakes (our own and our classmates' mistakes). So please do not immediately correct your own mistakes. If possible, wait until you receive feedback from at least one of your peers. If necessary, correct your work and resubmit the entire assignment. Your instructor will only review and grade your most recent submission, so please do not refer to a previous submission.PromptUse the applet to select 20 different random samples of 100 part-time college students. For each sample the applet calculates the 95% confidence interval. How many of the 20 random samples do not contain the population proportion? Is this what you expected? Explain.

Assignment #2. Article Critique Assignment. Due by Day 7. Here are the instructions posted in the Week 7 forum for the Article Critique Assignment:Assignment 2: Article CritiqueThe practice of quantitative research not only involves statistical calculations and formulas but also involves the understanding of statistical techniques related to real-world applications. You might not become a quantitative researcher nor use statistical methods in your profession but as a consumer, citizen, and scholar-practitioner, it will be important for you to become a critical consumer of research, which will empower you to read, interpret, and evaluate the strength of claims made in scholarly material and daily news.For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to repeated measures ANOVA. To prepare*Review the Article Critique Assignment Guide in the Walden Library, listed in the Week 2 Learning Resources.*Search the Walden Library for a quantitative article that applies repeated measures ANOVA.Write a 2- to 3-page critique of the research you found in the Walden Library that includes responses to the following prompts: *Why did the authors select repeated measures ANOVA in the research?*Do you think this test was the most appropriate choice? Why or why not?*Did the authors display the results in a figure or table?*Does the results table stand alone? In other words, are you able to interpret the study from it? Why or why not?Please post question on any element or concept regarding Repeated Measures ANOVA in this forum.

I will send pictures of the questions, could range from 10-20 depending on if i get the answers correct and if you could respond back to me as answering that would be awesome!