Need statstics help with Metacognition

Dec 4th, 2015
SKTFaker
Category:
Statistics
Price: $25 USD

Question description

Descriptive Statistics

Doug and David are researchers who examine youth health.  Numerous recent studies have suggested that youth in the 10- to 15-year-old range are increasingly engaged in many hours of video game playing, they are not active enough (as defined by at least one hour of exercise per day), and they are disconnected to their family units.  However, in some of their own previous research Doug and David found that although students play a lot of video games they remain active and engage in sufficient exercise.  In their current study they asked children to keep a log and then to report for a given week the number of hours of video game playing an exercise that they engage in an also to report the number of dinners that their families eat together as a measure of family connection.  They also collected gender and age as demographic data.

This is the data for Doug and David’s study.

ID

AGE

Gender

Hours

Exercise

Dinner

1

12

1

3

14

5

2

13

1

14

10

3

3

12

2

12

2

2

4

11

1

6

7

3

5

11

1

2.5

8.5

3

6

12

2

15

6

2

7

13

1

14

5

1

8

12

2

16

6

4

9

12

1

6

8

3

10

12

2

8

9

3

11

12

1

8

12

3

12

14

1

5

14

3

13

13

2

13

12

3

14

13

1

12

3

2

15

12

2

8.5

7

2

16

12

1

7.75

6

4

17

11

1

8.25

5.5

6

18

14

1

9

8

2

19

14

2

12

7

1

20

12

2

16.5

11.25

3

21

12

2

5.75

10

4

22

12

2

9.75

4

5

23

13

2

12.5

36

1

24

11

1

11.25

4

3

25

12

1

8.25

4

1

26

12

2

24

0

2

27

14

1

1.5

14.5

3

28

12

2

4

12

1

29

12

1

2.75

12

3

30

13

2

14

2.5

4

31

13

1

2.5

13

7

32

14

2

9.25

10

2

33

11

1

8.75

8

3

34

12

1

11.5

7.75

3

35

12

1

12.5

6.5

3

36

13

1

8.25

7

2

37

12

2

7.5

12.25

2

38

12

1

5.75

14

4

39

13

2

6.25

11.5

1

40

11

2

6.5

10.5

2

1.Generate one descriptive research question that can be addressed by Doug and David’s data.

2.Generate one relationship research question that can be addressed by these data.

3.State one null hypothesis that can be tested with these data.

4.Identify the level of measurement for each of the following variables: 

a.Age (reported in years), 

b.Gender (reported as Female=1; Male =2)

c.Hours of video game playing in the week (reported to the quarter hour)

d.Exercise time (reported to the quarter hour)

e.Dinners taken together as a family (0-7 dinners in the week).

5.Please enter the data into a file after double-checking for accuracy. (Excel file.)

6.Please provide descriptive information for each of the variables above (age, gender, hours of video game watching, exercise time, and number of dinners taken together).  Which is the best measurement of central tendency for each variable? Why?

7.Are there more girls than boys in the sample? On average, do youth in the sample spend more time playing video games or exercising? Do boys or girls spend more time playing video games? Exercising?

Extra Credit: Graph the dinners (as a pie chart) and gender (as a histogram) data.  Graph the age, hours of game playing, and hours of exercise data with frequency distributions. (You can do all of these things with Excel graphing. Team up or check with one another if you have trouble

Part II Metacognition Data

These are the summary statistics for the dataset you generated from taking the Metacognition Scale two weeks ago. 

(See the excel data file Metcognition_Data.xls and Metacognition_Data2.xls in the Wiki Tool for this assignment for actual datasets.)

Descriptive Statistics

N

Range

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Variance

Statistic

Statistic

Statistic

Statistic

Statistic

Std. Error

Statistic

Statistic

Knowledge of Cognition

20

8.00

9.00

17.00

13.6000

.48341

2.16187

4.674

Regulation of Cognition

20

15.00

18.00

33.00

28.1500

1.00597

4.49883

20.239

Metacog_Total

20

19.00

30.00

49.00

41.7500

1.19621

5.34962

28.618

Valid N (listwise)

20

8.Verify that the standardized (z-scores) reported in the data set are correct for: MB, DD, and AN. 

(The formula for Z-score found on p.40 of Riverside_Testing_Web_Glossary. The Standard deviation is reported in the table of Descriptive Statistics under Part Two.)

9.Which of the students appears to have greater strength in Metacognition Knowledge Score as compared to his/her Regulation score?

10.Which of the students seems to have nearest the same Metacognition Knowledge and Regulation scores?

11.Which of the students has the Metacognition Total score closest to the group mean score?

Part III – Using Standardized Scores and Testing Hypotheses

Name

Group

Knowledge of Cognition

Regulation of Cognition

Metacognition Total

Knowledge Z-Score

Regulation Z-Score

Total Z-Score

MB

1

11

29

40

-1.202662

0.188938

-0.32713

AA

1

16

28

44

1.11015

-0.033342

0.420591

SA

1

11

33

44

-1.202662

1.078058

0.420591

AI

1

15

31

46

0.647587

0.633498

0.794449

Finally, If we wondered whether there was a difference between the Metacognition “level” or “ability” of two groups of students (Groups 1 and 2) then the Hypotheses we would be testing would look like this:

Ho1: there is no difference between the Knowledge of Cognition average score in Groups 1 and 2.

Ho2: there is no difference between the Regulation of Cognition average score in Groups 1 and 2.

Ho3: there is no difference in the Total Metacognition Score for Groups 1 and 2.

12)Based on results of the Hypotheses testing above (using a nonparametric statistical test called the Mann-Whitney test of Independent Means):

a.Was there a difference between groups in Knowledge of Cognition? What decision of the Hypothesis Test was posted for the result? (reject or retain the null hypothesis?) What does this mean?

b.Was there a difference between groups in Regulation of Cognition? What was the level of significance determined in this hypothesis test? What decision was posted for the result of this hypothesis test? What does this mean?

c.Was there an overall difference between Metacognition Total group means? What was the level of significance reported for this test?

d.What conclusions can you draw from the results posted for this sample of students?


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: Purdue University
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

7 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
kpcutie
Dec 2nd, 2016
" Excellent job "
Hemapathy
Nov 18th, 2016
" all I can say is wow very fast work, great work thanks "
BlueOcean
Nov 5th, 2016
" Awesome! Exactly what I wanted. "
kevin12622
Oct 27th, 2016
" Goes above and beyond expectations ! "
ashleyisgod
Oct 13th, 2016
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
likeplum4
Oct 4th, 2016
" Excellent work as usual "
Molly_Moon
Sep 21st, 2016
" AMAZING as always! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1822 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors