IHP 430 Module Three Group Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Multi-voting Process Tool 1. Review the following scenario. Choose a multi-voting process tool you will use to complete the analysis of the scenario. Then, work through the scenario to determine which project you will select. 2. Next, discuss the process and the tool you used to complete the multi-voting process analysis with your group on the discussion topic. 3. Finally, discuss the four criteria that should be considered when problem-solving: risk, economy, timing, and resources. Using a multi-voting process tool, address the following problem: Ten projects are being considered by the QM team. Based on team member preferences (below), if a single vote is held, Project D will be selected. The chair wants to consider team member preferences beyond simply their first choices. Use a multi-voting process and assign three points to each member’s first choice, two points to the second, and one point to the third. After the first vote, options that receive fewer than three points should be eliminated and the remaining options re-voted. In subsequent rounds, two points will be given to the first choice and one point to the second. Continue to eliminate low vote-tallying options until all but two options have been eliminated. On the final vote, each team member will get a single vote worth one point. Which option will be selected? Jacob Isabella Ethan Emma Olivia D, I, B, C, A, F, E, J, H, G A, C, E, F, G, J, D, H, I, B H, G, E, D, B, I, J, A, C, F D, I, F, A, E, G, B, C, H, J B, G, A, J, H, C, F, E, I, D Multi-voting Process Tool Peer Feedback: As healthcare managers, there are two important skills to master: working in groups or teams, and giving and receiving constructive feedback. For this project, each team is composed of three to five team members. Individually, complete your multi-voting process analysis to select the best approach in identifying problems and post it to your group’s discussion topic to share with your team members during Module Three. During Module Three, you will go to the group discussion to review your team members’ multi-voting analysis responses. When reviewing your peers work, offer constructive feedback (to at least two peers). You are expected to provide feedback on the content of the multi-voting analysis and compare and contrast each peer approach with your own. The communication tone of the critique must be professional and respectful, and contain a rationale that supports your critique. Make content recommendations that are focused and relevant to the multi-voting process analysis, and use proper mechanics of writing. This must be completed before the end of Module Three. Your final product will be graded individually. Rubric Critical Elements Discussion of Process and Tools Used in Analysis Discussion of the Four Criteria Analyses of Problem Using the Multivoting Process Tool Critique of Content Content Recommendations Exemplary (100%) Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates indepth knowledge of the process and the tools used to complete the multi-voting process analysis Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates indepth knowledge of the four criteria: risk, economy, timing, and resources Meets or exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates exceptional knowledge of the multi-voting tool used in problem analysis Exceeds “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates in-depth knowledge of content to provide peer with an exemplary critique Exceeds “Proficient” criteria by providing exemplary recommendations that are focused and relevant to the multi-voting process analysis Proficient (85%) Effectively discusses the process and the tools used to complete the multi-voting process analysis Needs Improvement (55%) Effectively discusses the multivoting analysis tool, but does not evaluate the process Not Evident (0%) Does not discuss the tool or process used to complete the multi-voting process analysis Effectively discusses the four criteria: risk, economy, timing, and resources Discusses at least two of the four criteria: risk, economy, timing, and resources Does not discuss any of the four criteria: risk, economy, timing, and resources 20 Analyzes problem using the multi-voting tool Partially completes analysis using the multi-voting tool Does not complete analysis using the multi-voting tool 20 Critique is clear, with concrete information that could be acted on for improvement, as well as positive acknowledgement when indicated Makes recommendations that are focused and relevant to the multi-voting process analysis Critique is constructive, but may lack clarity or indicate non-specific action Critique is superfluous, vague, non-specific, and unclear 20 Makes recommendations that are focused on the analysis conducted, but do not include feedback that is relevant Does not make recommendations 20 Earned Total Value 20 100% 
Purchase answer to see full attachment