Module 6: Discussion ForumRead the Critical Thinking Case, Motivating Employees at JC Penney, Walmart, and Amazon in the Age of Online Shopping (pp. 244-246). AttachedDo you have experience working in retail? If so, what is/was the experience and what motivation schemes were used? Were the schemes effective?If you have no personal retail experience, describe a retailer (an online retailer, a brick and mortar retailer, or a mixed online and brick and mortar retailer) and describe the motivation schemes used. Do the schemes appear to be effective?As retailing changes, what new motivation challenges do you foresee? For example, a 2015 New York Times article described Amazon as “a soulless, dystopian workplace where no fun is had and no laughter is heard” (Cook, 2015, n.p.). Is this a fair reputation?By Thursday of this week, submit substantive initial posts of at least 250 words that answer or address the issues in the discussion board.

Sustainable Talent Management Due Week 10 and worth 200 points With the same talent management strategy in mind from Assignment 3, write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you: Determine which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent. Analyze the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process. Develop appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise. Assess the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization. Recommend a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process. Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Determine the effects of leadership in the management of talent pools and the talent review process. Compare and contrast the talent assessment and employee performance management processes. Review the process of developing functional expertise and setting and measuring talent management objectives. Discover how the management process affects global talent management. Determine the organizational benefits of strategy-driven talent management and building a sustainable process. Use technology and information resources to research issues in talent management. Write clearly and concisely about talent management using proper writing mechanics. for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 200 Assignment 5: Sustainable Talent Management Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Determine which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent.Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely determined which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent. Partially determined which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent. Satisfactorily determined which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent. Thoroughly determined which performance management process you will employ to measure employee talent. 2. Analyze the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process.Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process. Partially analyzed the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process. Satisfactorily analyzed the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process. Thoroughly analyzed the key concepts related to the talent pools and the talent review process. 3. Develop appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise.Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely developed appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise. Partially developed appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise. Satisfactorily developed appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise. Thoroughly developed appropriate talent management objectives to measure functional expertise. 4. Assess the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization.Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization. Partially assessed the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization. Satisfactorily assessed the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization. Thoroughly assessed the key elements of global talent management as they apply to your organization. 5. Recommend a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process.Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely recommended a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process. Partially recommended a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process. Satisfactorily recommended a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process. Thoroughly recommended a process that optimizes a sustainable talent management process. 6. ReferencesWeight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present