Hi,I need 2 – 3 typed and double-spaced paper about American history, specifically about (Unit Three) — “Debating the Origins of the American Revolution”. This is a reading and writing assignment.I will provide you with link and access to the EBook once my offer has been accepted.Book: David Emory Shi, America: The Essential Learning Edition — Volume I, 2nd Edition, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. (2018)Reading Assignment (from your textbook):“Thinking Like a Historian” — Debating the Origins of the American Revolution, 148-151Secondary Source 1 — Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1992)Secondary Source 2 — Gary Nash, “Social Change and the Growth of Prerevolutionary Urban Radicalism” (1976)Primary Source 1 — John Dickinson, “Letter from a Farmer in Pennsylvania” (1767)Primary Source 2 — Governor Francis Bernard, “Letter to the Lords of Trade” (1765)Instructions: Note: The “Thinking Like a Historian” sections of your textbook provide us an opportunity to understand how (and why) historians have interpreted the past in different ways. By highlighting the works of two historians from different time periods, these sections give us a glimpse into the field of historiography — the history of doing history. These brief excerpts are “secondary sources” — sources produced by scholars after the fact. In addition, your textbook author (David Emory Shi) has included primary documents to be read alongside of the secondary source excerpts. Primary documents are historical artifacts that comes from the time period under examination and can take a variety of forms (ie letters, diaries, political documents, movies, advertisements, etc.). In this first “Thinking Like a Historian” section, Shi provides excerpts from two renowned historians of the Revolutionary era who have different interpretations for how and why the Revolution occurred. After reading the two excerpted secondary sources and the two primary sources carefully, write a two to three typed and double-spaced paper with standard font and margins that answers the question in bold below.Based on what you’ve read in your textbook so far, with particular attention to the two primary documents in the “Thinking Like a Historian” section, which historian — Bailyn or Nash — do you think has the stronger interpretation. Why?In responding to the question above, you should include a brief summary of both Bailyn and Nash’s respective arguments and you should take into consideration how the two primary documents either strengthen or weaken those arguments.

Supporting Lectures:Ethical SystemsEthics and CourtsTrial Court WorkgroupProsecutors, as agents for the state, take an oath to uphold the Constitution and to seek justice on behalf of the state and its citizens.Summarize the duties of a prosecutor in a criminal case, emphasizing those tasks that allow the prosecutor to wield strong influence over the case. Discuss how these particular tasks might present the prosecutor with ethical dilemmas.Given that a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty under the American judicial system, is the prosecutor also required to consider the defendant as being among the citizens he or she is protecting? Identify and explain the conflicting moral imperatives present in the duties of a prosecutor.Recap the landmark Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland (1963). Discuss the ramifications of this decision for prosecutors, with an emphasis on the ethical conflicts that may result.Discuss the prosecutor’s ethical responsibilities when faced with a case that he or she would rather not pursue. For instance, consider a case in which a formerly battered wife is accused of attempted murder against her husband. Explain whether the “ethics of duty” or “ethics of care” outweigh utilitarianism for criminal prosecutors.Submit your response in a 4–6–page Microsoft Word document