Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jun 4th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook.

Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the "Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics" template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Article Citation and Permalink (APA format) Point Article 1 Description Broad Topic Area/Title Problem Statement (What is the problem research is addressing?) Purpose Statement (What is the purpose of the study?) Research Questions (What questions does the research seek to answer?) Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables Population of Interest for Study Sample Sampling Method Identify Data Collection Identify how data were collected Summarize Data Collection Approach Discuss Data Analysis Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables. Summarize Results of Study Summary of Assumptions and Limitations Identify the assumptions and limitations from the article. 2 Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author. Ethical Considerations Evaluate the article and identify potential ethical considerations that may have occurred when sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, or publishing results. Summarize your findings below in 250-500 words. Provide rationale and support for your evaluation. 3 Course Code HLT-362V Class Code HLT-362V-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Article (Quantitative, APA Citation and Permalink) 5.0% Article Citation and Permalink 5.0% Broad Topic Area/Title 5.0% Problem Statement 5.0% Purpose Statement 5.0% Research Questions 5.0% Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used.) 5.0% Identify Variables and Type of Data for Variables 5.0% Population of Interest for Study 5.0% Sample 5.0% Sampling Method 5.0% Identify Data Collection 5.0% Summary of Data Collection Approach 5.0% Data Analysis 5.0% Summary Results of Study 5.0% Summary Assumptions and Limitations 10.0% Summary of Ethical Considerations 10.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) The article presented does not use quantitative research. Article citation and permalink are omitted. Broad topic area and title are omitted. Problem statement is omitted or incorrect. Purpose statement is omitted or incorrect. Research questions are omitted or incorrect. Definition of hypothesis is omitted. The definition of the hypothesis is incorrect. Variable type and data for variable are omitted. Population of interest for the study is omitted. Sample is omitted. Sampling method is omitted. How data were collected is not identified. The means of data collection are omitted. Data analysis is omitted. Summary of the results of the study is omitted or incorrect. Identification of assumptions and limitations by the author is omitted. Summary of potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author is omitted or not relevant to the study. Summary of ethical considerations is omitted. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Total Points 140.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) N/A Article citation and permalink are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect. Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete. Problem statement is referenced but is incomplete. Purpose statement is referenced but is incomplete. Research questions are partially presented. Hypothesis is summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sampling method is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. How data were collected is presented but is incorrect. The means of data collection are referenced. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Data analysis is incomplete. Not all types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. The types of statistical tests listed are incorrect or unrelated to the variables indicated. The results of the study are partially presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. More information is needed. Some assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are partially presented. Significant information is needed. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are incomplete. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Significant information and rationale are needed to support summary. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) N/A Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas. Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Problem statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. Purpose statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. N/A Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are inaccuracies. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies. Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies. Sampling method is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. How data were collected is partially presented. There are inaccuracies or omissions. The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. Data analysis is summarized. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There are inaccuracies or omissions. The results of study are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. Some information or rationale is needed for support. Most assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More information or rationale is needed for support. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are presented. There are some inaccuracies. Some information and rationale are needed to support summary. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 4: Good (85.00%) N/A Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format. Page numbers are used in to cite information. There are minor errors. Broad topic area and title are presented. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Problem statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Purpose statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. N/A Hypothesis is defined. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Variable type and data for variable are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. Sampling method is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. How data were collected is identified. There are minor inaccuracies The means of data collection are summarized. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. Data analysis is generally discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There minor inaccuracies. The results of study are summarized. Minor detail or information is needed for accuracy or clarity. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Some information or rationale is needed for support. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Some rationale or evidence are needed to support summary. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 5: Excellent (100.00%) The article presented is based on quantitative research. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information. Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate. Problem statement is accurate and clearly summarized. Purpose statement is accurate and clearly summarized. Research questions are presented and accurate. Comments Hypothesis is accurate and clearly defined Variable type and data for variable are presented and accurate. Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate. Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided. Sampling method is presented and accurate. How data were collected is fully identified and accurate. The means of data collection are thoroughly summarized and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided. Data analysis is discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are all indicated and accurate. The results of study are well summarized. The summary is accurate and clearly represents the results of the study. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Strong rationale is provided to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are clearly summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Strong rationale and support are provided. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Points Earned ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

TutorLarra
School: Purdue University

Attached.

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
Article Citation and
Permalink
(APA format)
Point

Article 1

Description

Broad Topic Area/Title

Study on Obesity and influence of dietary factors on the weight status of an adult
population in Jamnagar City of Gujarat: A cross-sectional analytical study

Problem Statement

Obesity is a burgeoning epidemic of global proportions and is a major factor in the
growing cases of chronic illnesses. The topic needs further studies to establish its
prevalence in the adult population and the contribution of dietary factors in escalating
the numbers of obese indivi...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors