Week 4 Discussion #1: The Experience MachineTo ensure that your initial post starts its own unique thread, do not reply to this post. Instead, please click the "Reply" link above this post.Please read the general discussion requirements above, as well as the announcements explaining the discussion requirements and answering the most frequently asked questions. If you are still unsure about how to proceed with the discussion, please reply to one of those announcements or contact your instructor.Please carefully read and think about the entire prompt before composing your first post. This discussion will require you to have carefully read Chapter 5 of the textbook, as well as the assigned portions of Aristotle’s (1931) Nicomachean Ethics.If you recall from Week 2/Chapter 3, John Stuart Mill (2008) defines happiness as the experience of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, which means that happiness is very much a matter of how I feel “on the inside”. However, Aristotle (1931) holds a rather different view of happiness (or in his terms, “eudaimonia”). One way that we think about this difference is to conduct a “thought experiment” in which we imagine that we have certain “inner” experiences, but outwardly things are quite different. One such thought experiment is provided by the philosopher Robert Nozick in his description of the “experience machine”:“Suppose there were an experience machine that would give you any experience you desired. Superduper neuropsychologists could stimulate your brain so that you would think and feel you were writing a great novel, or making a friend, or reading an interesting book. All the time you would be floating in a tank, with electrodes attached to your brain…Of course, while in the tank you won’t know that you’re there; you’ll think it’s actually happening…Would you plug in? What else can matter to us, other than how our lives feel from the inside?” (Nozick, 1974, p. 43)In the course of the week’s discussion, you will need to do the following (not necessarily in this order):Engage with the text: Using at least one quote from the assigned texts, explain Aristotle’s notion of eudaimonia. Then, discuss whether Aristotle would consider someone hooked up to the experience machine to be “happy” in the sense captured by that notion of eudaimonia. Reflect on yourself: If you had the chance to be permanently hooked up to the experience machine, would you do it? Explain your choice. For example, if you would not hook up, you may discuss the kinds of goods or aims that would be lost by hooking up, or you may discuss the core, essential features of your life (or of human life in general) that are undermined by being in such a state. Reflect on human life: Based on your response, do you think that we can describe aspects of a telos (in Aristotle’s sense) that applies to humanity in general, or at least most people? Correspondingly, could there be a difference between feeling happy and being happy? Do you think that people can be wrong about happiness? (Notice that this isn’t asking whether there are different ways in which people can find happiness; it’s asking whether some of those ways could be mistaken.)Discuss with your peers: According to virtue ethics, reflecting on the aims and goods essential to human flourishing (if there are any) can help us understand the virtues we need to fulfill those and the vices that would be detrimental, as well as the corresponding kinds of choices and behaviors. Reflect with your peers on what their account reveals about the virtuous life, whether that conflicts with some of the values and choices common in society, your career field, family, or other social atmospheres.

It is time to practice analyzing political cartoons. Complete the following steps for your assignment:Visit Five Decades of Herblock on The Washington Post web site.Select 1956–1965, and then select 1966–1975. For both selections, read the essays and view the five political cartoons associated with each decade: Determine the issue of the respective historical moments that each of these cartoons critiques.Note which visual elements (the actual drawing, including the layout and design) and verbal elements (the text, including titles and captions) are combined to produce particular meanings and effects in each cartoon.Select any five political cartoons from the Herblock collection. For each of the political cartoons you choose, write a paragraph analysis that does the following: Identifies the vice, issue, or institution that the cartoon satirizes.Analyzes the visual and verbal elements that combine to produce meaning and effect.Identifies the elements of satire the creator uses. Refer to the list of elements above and those listed in the slideshow.Evaluates the effectiveness of the satire. Are the cartoonist’s techniques effective? Why or why not?

Paper Question: As revealed in the March trilogy, describe the tools of oppression used to deny African Americans their civil and political rights. You may wish to consider the role of political leaders, law enforcement, the courts, businesses, every-day racists, etc.