What is a literature review? In short, a dissertation literature review provides a critical assessment of the sources (literature) you have gathered and read surrounding your subject area, and then identifies a “gap” in that literature that your research will attempt to address. So the gap being researched is women living in rural north georgia who treat substance abuse problems using online rehabilitation services.   This is not to flow like a paper.  Each heading needs needs 7-8 sources (within the last 5 years)(APA citations) with just little info pulled from each source to show how things are related or contradict each other.  This is NOT a summary of the research articles or the actual research done, just a presentation of the facts and how they can build a foundation for the gap mentioned above.  Please ensure each sentence has in text citations  and all sources listed in APA formatting for works cited. Headings (need 7-8 sources) are as follows and sub headings (3-4 sources) Main headings are not indented (sub headings are indented) What is drug abuse/addition/dependency           types of drugs, (opiods, meth, alcohol, etc) Beginning of telemedicine/telerehab Recovery Options           in person/online          self directed/court ordered          medicated/non medicated Rural vs urban drug problems          North Georgia drug problems Addiction in women Self-regulation theory bandura theory Women and addiction Qualitative Studies approach

Companies are consistently adjusting and adapting to the changes both within and outside the organization. When considering the 10 operations management decisions, many companies are looking to modify different aspects to remain a suitable company to the consumers and the competitors. This guide to operations management include areas such as location, goods and services, human resources and job design, scheduling, inventory, quality management, maintenance, process and capacity design, supply chain management, and layout design and strategy (Kettering University, 2016). Boeing has been under the microscope following the crash of two Boeing 737 Max jets. Prior to this incident, regulators in the United States had detected a pattern of safety dilemmas that stemmed from a Boeing subcontractor in Japan that had been falsifying certification on the cargo doors for a vast amount of 777s (Laris, 2019). The falsifying of these certifications had been going on for years. These failures seem to be due to poor project management. Additional risks need to be considered and a risk management plan must be established to ensure the proper measures are taken to resolve and or mitigate any potential risks that may follow. By using the 10 operations management decisions factors that will be more of a focus for resolving failure issues may include but are not limited to maintenance, layout design and strategy, inventory, scheduling, quality management, goods and services, and process and capacity design (Kettering University, 2016). Many of the concerning issues would be limited if compliance standards were held in a strict place and abided by (Laris, 2019). This paper will focus on the standards that these companies should have in place along with the changes that need to be made in order to maintain these standards. There will be a discussion concerning the potential risks and the actions that were taken as well as the construction of a plan that will reduce that particular risk from reoccurring. The suggested title would be Learning from Failure.  References https://online.kettering.edu/news/2016/09/21/10-cr... Laris, M. (2017 June 27). Long Before the Max disasters, Boeing had history of failing to fix safety problems. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/long-before-themax (Links to an external site.) disasters-boeing-had-a-history-of-failing-to-fix-safetyproblems/2019/06/26/b4f5f720-86ee-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.h Also a presentation with this assignment  After you write your research paper, you will create a five minute narrated presentation using Canvas Studio. Your presentation should meet this basic criterion. Title slide with the topic, course number, and author (student) identified. Overview or introduction slide to describe the presentation content. A sufficient number of slides to convey the method and findings of the review. Audio that further describes the slide content. Summary or conclusion slide to close the presentation. Reference list to show the sources cited within the presentation. Video, animation, or other supporting elements as desired to enhance the presentation.