Peer Response

User Generated

gnyx2jneelo

Mathematics

CUNY City College of New York

Description

For your response to a classmate (two responses required, one in each option), solve your classmate’s confidence interval or hypothesis test problem, using a significance level not previously used Make sure that you use appropriate terminology and specify whether you are using the classical method or the p-value method.

Response 1:

I was interested in knowing if the average weight of an acorn from a white oak tree was different than the average weight of an acorn from a chestnut oak tree. I collected 8 random samples from a white oak tree and came out with the weights of: 1.2 g, .9 g, 2.0 g, 1.4 g, 1.3 g, .7 g , 1.1 g, 1.0 g. I collected 8 random samples from a chestnut oak and came out to the weights of: .9 g, 1.2 g, 2.2 g, 1.1 g, 2.4 g, 1.0 g, 2.0 g, .9 g.

White OakChestnut Oak
1.2g.9g
.9g1.2g
2.0g2.2g
1.4g1.1g
1.3g2.4g
.7g1.0g
1.1g2.0g
1.0g.9g

Compute a 95% confidence interval of the given population means.

Response 2:

The makers of the anxiety drug Xanax, reported that 26 of the 374 subjects who took the drug experienced hallucinations as a side effect, compared to 8 of the 210 subjects who were on a placebo. None of patients knew which treatment they were given. In the sample, a larger percentage of the people on the drug experienced hallucinations, but is this percentage enough to say that the entire population on the drug would experience more hallucinations? Use the α = 0.05 level of significance.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document attached.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Discussion Rubric: Undergraduate Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment. For your initial post (1), you must do the following:  Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.  In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.  In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Take into consideration material such as course content and other discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when appropriate (make sure you are using proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular resources). For your response posts (2), you must do the following:  Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread.  In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.  In Modules Two through Eight, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating that “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt. Rubric Critical Elements Comprehension Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Timeliness Engagement Writing (Mechanics) Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) Proficient Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85%) Submits initial post on time (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85%) Writes posts that are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55%) Submits initial post one day late (55%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (55%) Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) Value 40 Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) 10 Total 30 20 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Related Tags