Multiethnic Asian Americans Two Eassy

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jun 9th, 2019
account_balance_wallet $80

Question Description

Two (2) essay. The study questions below are intended to spur your thinking about how the course materials—what we’ve read, and the films that we’ve watched—might be related to each other as well as to the overall course goals.

Writing Requirement:

  • Please answer all the four questions of Part1 and Part2 in essay, so you need write TWO essay (one for Part 1, and another for Part 2).
  • Each essay need to use at least two Reading Reserves (Please not use quote). If the Reserves cannot open please let me know.
  • Each essay at least 800 words.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Two (2) essay. The study questions below are intended to spur your thinking about how the course materials—what we’ve read, and the films that we’ve watched—might be related to each other as well as to the overall course goals. Writing Requirement:  Please answer all the four questions of Part1 and Part2 in essay, so you need write TWO essay (one for Part 1, and another for Part 2).  Each essay need to use at least two Reading Reserves (Please not use quote). If the Reserves cannot open please let me know.  Each essay 800 words. Part 1 1. How (in what main ways) have Asian American communities viewed multiethnic Asian Americans? Why have they viewed them in those ways? Are these attitudes, that Spickard called “the subdominant discourse” racist, according to racial formations theory? Why or why not? 2. How do you explain / account for the very negative responses that some Asian Americans had to Eric Byler’s film, charlotte sometimes? 3. Does the film charlotte sometimes challenge or reinforce the stereotypes that impinge on the heterosexual intimate relationships of multiethnic Asian American men and women? In your answer, be sure to identify and analyze all of the relevant stereotypes discussed in the readings, which include, but are not limited to, those we discussed in lecture and in section. 4. Who’s getting together with who, and why? What roles do race and gender play in the main patterns of Asian American intimate heterosexual relationships that we have studied? Reading Reserves for Part 1:  Hall, "Eurogamy among Asian-Americans: A Note on Western Assimilation” File (PDF)  Shinagawa and Pang, “Asian American Panethnicity and Intermarriage” (PDF)  Valverde, “Doing the Mixed-Race Dance” (PDF)  Yu, “Mixing Bodies and Cultures” (PDF)  Byler, "Race, Sex and the 'Charlotte Sometimes' Controversy” https://gauchospace.ucsb.edu/courses/pluginfile.php/2916487/mod_resource/content/1/Byler_ Race_Sex.htm  Cheung, “Negative Attraction” http://www.americanpopularculture.com/journal/articles/fall_2002/cheung.htm Part 2 1. Why did the dominant society’s attitudes towards mixing and mixedness change over the course of the twentieth century? What do you think explains the shift, in other words, in the discourse of multiraciality from overwhelmingly negative to highly positive? Overall, would you say that the change represents real progress, a reinscription of White supremacy, or something in-between? 2. How does Heidi Bub identify, and why? Compare her story to that of Hyun Sook Lee / Natasha (as recounted in “Rick Smolan tells the story of a girl”). What circumstances might account for the very different ways these two individuals negotiate their multiplicity? Is Heidi Bub a multiethnic Asian American? Why / why not? 3. Where does multiethnic discourse, and in particular multiethnic Asian American discourse, go from here? Is an Asian America that recognizes and embraces its multiplicity possible, in your view? Why or why not? Is the idea of the 3rd space a viable option? Why or why not? Should the U.S. Census have a “multiracial” category? Why or why not? 4. What does the reimagined Battlestar Galactica television series—and especially the various characters played by Grace Park—suggest about contemporary attitudes towards multiplicity in general, and Asian American multiplicity in particular? How much have these attitudes changed compared to the early twentieth century? Does the figure of Cylon model #8 constitute a racist racial project in the tradition of the “tragic mulatt@”? For example, in what ways might #8 be understood as a descendant of the “invisible monster” Cynthia Nakashima discussed in her earlier work? Does the figure of Cylon model #8 function as what Nakashima later called a “servant of culture”? Reading Reserves for Part 2:  McIntosh, “White Privilege and Male Privilege (PDF)  Deis, “Erasing Difference” (PDF)  Nishime, “Aliens” (PDF)  Pegues, “Miss Cylon” (PDF)  Spencer, “Assessing multiracial Identity Theory and Politics” (PDF)  Videos Natasha's Story / Rick Smolan Tells the Story of a Girl URL https://www.ted.com/talks/rick_smolan_tells_the_story_of_a_girl  Videos Daughter from Danang https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AU_VUe2HX0 Eurogamy Among Asian-Americans: Western Assimilation A Note on RONALD E. HALL* Michigan State University Quality of life in the United States is contingent upon assimilation into the mainstream of American society. Domination is the preferred model. Asians stigmatized by their dark skin are prohibited from immediate membership. Their strategy is Eurogamy: a form of exogamy in which Asian-Americans select EuroAmerican spouses as a method of sharing in the Euro gene pool. In this way they alter the stigma of dark skin. Via offspring they expect full assimilation into the mainstream and its commensurate quality of life. In the context of assimilation Asians’ preferred exogamy with Euro-Americans put the “American Dream” within reach. Exogamy with people of color can have the opposite effect requiring compensation as penalty for the loss in assimilation potential. A superior SES frequently serve the stigma associated with non-Euro-Asian exogamy (Aldridge, 1978). Immigrants from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka once settled in the US constantly seek ways to prove themselves “white” (Mazumdar, 1989). In the process vehement forms of denigration are acted out against people of color, particularly black Americans. Asian-as per Mongoloid-includes an extensive array of ethnics (Logan, Alba & McNulty, 1994; Ashilova, 1971). It connotes the various groups that comprise the race. It is less threatened by the Euro gene pool although purity is valued. While Asians are Mongoloids who can be very different culturally, racially, they are brought together by common genetic traits. Furthermore, within each Asian ethnic exists *Direct all correspondence to: Ronald E. Hall, David Walker Research Institute/Department Michigan State Universitv. East Lansing. Michigan 48824- 13 17. Teleohone: The Social Science Journal, Volume 34, Number 3, pages 403-408. Copyright 0 1997 by JAI Press Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. ISSN: 0362-3319. (5 17) 353-3014. of Social Work, 404 THE SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL Vol. 34iNo. 3/l 997 beliefs and practices that further complicate the process of assimilation. One practice, however, that does seem to be indicative of a large number of Asian groups in the US and elsewhere, is their tendency toward endogamy (Kikumura & Kitano, 1973). In countries such as Canada, Great Britian, and Australia, the phenomenon is fastly fading in the quest for Western assimilation (Hall, forthcoming). As a matter of the human condition marriage between potential mates is based upon the individual’s ability to be not only perceived as attractive but particularly for men by women, a worthy prospect (Aldridge, 1978; Rhee, 1988; Sung, 1990). For AsianAmerican women who marry exogamously, the ability to court and marry men in the US who have light skin is regarded as an invaluable asset in their quest for assimilation (Hall, forthcoming). That makes Euro-American men a worthy prospect. It further increases or reduces the frequency of exogamy between Asian-Americans and the various ethnics of color (Hall, 1995; Hall, 1994). It also necessitates that exogamy between American citizens and immigrated Asians having equal socioeconomic status be contingent upon the ability of the citizen via off-spring to lighten the skin color and Westernize the features of their Asian counterpart. It is most apparent among foreign students who express a desire to become citizens. When the socioeconomic status between they and the potential partner is unequal, an “exchange” theory based upon a proximity to Euro skin color will be used as the selection criterion (Haslam, 1995). The darker the skin, the more will be required in socioeconomic status. This is true whether either of the couples are foreign or citizen. Asians who marry exogamously-persons of Asian descent who exchange wedding vows with a non-Asian partner-do so in the midst of unprecedented social change. The “war bride” image, a stereotype of the humble, submissive Oriental mistress, is becoming oboslete. An objection to her traditional “war bride” mentality has undoubtedly influenced some to ignore the custom of selecting partners from within the ethnic group. Furthermore, video technology and jet propulsion have made it virtually impossible to remain isolated. When groups are isolated geographically, they are also isolated socially. As people come together via technology, social isolation-otherwise known as segregation-is viewed with less tolerance. The earlier isolation of Asians in the US hindered any effort at becoming comfortably assimilated into the mainstream of society. Access to educational opportunities and a better quality of life suffered because assimilation was less forthcoming. The unique features and “minority” status of Asian-Americans marked them as ineligible for participation in the Euro gene pool (Kaplan, 1990). That participation would have been a consequence of normal assimilation as evidenced by the relative ease of the mainstream in accepting members from among the various European ethnic groups (Bolger, 1985). The ultimate for AsianAmericans was instead limited to the economic rewards of society and a quality of life commensurate with those limited rewards. Marriage, from the beginning, has stood as the true test and enabler of complete and total assimilation (Gurak & Fitzpatrick, 1982). But for members of Euro ethnic groups, being physically similar to the mainstream, assimilation was of less concern. That is, while Euro-American groups experienced discrimination initially, assimilation required of them to merely embrace American ideals (Alba, 1981). The status of their gene pool had already satisfied assimilation criteria. For Asian-Americans, the decision to embrace American ideals did not satisfy criteria for acceptance. They were left Eurogamy Among Asian-Americans 405 with the task of somehow altering themselves to affect less Asian or more European (Wong, 1978). The difference in the process for Euro-American groups and AsianAmericans then required that assimilation of Euro-Americans be little more than the decision to learn a new language, practice new customs, or develop a taste for different foods. In most cases by the second or third generation they were fully assimilated. Exogamy for Euro-Americans thus became a result of the assimilation process whereas for Asians-Americans it remains a strategy of, making for the concept of “Eurogamy.” Eurogamy is originally an extension of various forms of European domination vis a vis imperialism and/or coloniztion. In the US it is manifested in the marital patterns of minority groups who must assimilate into a Euro mainstream. Eurogamy is the preferred marital pattern of a less powerful group, Asian-Americans, to a more powerful group, Euro-American. In acquiring Euro genes, the stigma of Asian features is minimized via offspring. The idealized light skin and round eyes then qualify AsianAmericans for assimilation and the commensurate quality of life. It occurs most frequently among those who settle in large urban centers. In the city of New York, Asian-Americans who marry eurogamously tend to be second generation or later, born in America, female, older, better educated, of higher occupational status, and have higher, incomes (Sung, 1990). Such urbanized Americans are associated less with the more customarily closed Asian community. Whether or not their marrying eurogamously adversely affects their children has not been established as fact of research, but their children do appear to have problems psychologically (Sung, 1990). Eurogamy on the part of Asian-Americans is also gender biased (Shingawa & Pang, 1988). For females the participation is more obvious. For males the prospects of marriage imposes differently given the tasks of assimilation. As a result, marital choices for both may be more controlled by the influences of assimilation because assimilation of less powerful groups into more powerful groups represents a form of domination (Allen & Jewell, 1995). In the US that reduces the status of Asian males who are not members of the Euro power structure. Limited mate selection from among the marriage minded Euro-American population is one way Asian-Americans attempt to conform to what is idealized (Cunningham, 1993). By way of eurogamy, full assimilation for Asian-Americans becomes immediately accessible. In the process they may develop ill notions relative to dark skin that discourages civil assimilation in toto. Such notions are quite common as reflected in the negative media portrayals of black men (Hall, 1993). All understand that dark skin is regarded by America’s various institutions as an obstacle that might otherwise afford the opportunity for assimilation and a better quality of life (Keowan, 1986). Although it may appear illogical, such methods of embracing Eurocentrisms has been a tradition for the successful assimilation of immigrant groups into the mainstream of American society. Those wishing to assimilate under the auspices of domination must not only idealize Eurocentrisms, but alter themselves to conform to a frequently contrasting phenotype. In the aftermath a motivation for eurogamy among AsianAmericans is incurred. As a social phenomenon, eurogamy is not unprecedented. Survival and the possibility of assimilation into the mainstream is greatly enhanced by the ability to idealize Eurocentrisms (Wortham, 1992). While blacks and Hispanics tend to congregate at the 406 THE SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL Vol. 34/No. 311997 lower rung of the American socioeconomic ladder, Asian-Americans as a group enjoy one of the highest per capita incomes in the country, including that for many EuroAmericans (Hirschman & Wong, 1984). Those who aspire to assimilation dictated by domination then invest their efforts in attaining the Euro ideal without respect to the psychological and emotional costs incurred over time. By engaging in such efforts, they expect-but infrequently acquire-full assimilation into the society and the quality of life associated with it. Why Asians-women in particular-marry eurogamously is inferred extensively in the work of Kitano. Much of it suggests the fact that in order for women to assimilate into a patriarch, power is gained indirectly via marriage; and Euro-American men are the holders of power in both the US and Canada (Sewell, 1992). While men are less likely than women to marry for power, except for Asians, high SES men of color seem to marry Euro-American women at increased rates (Kalmijn, 1993). In particular that includes black and Hispanic men. The eurogamy is quite obvious if such males have some unusually large amount of wealth or power that draw attention from the media (Warner, 1995; Coleman, 1995; Kozol, 1995). The praticality of light skin for mainstream assimilation is readily apparent. It is apparent not only in the frequency of Asian-American eurogamy, but the perception of resulting offspring. A Eurasain child-part-Asian, part-Euro-American-might be viewed as having greater assimilation potential than an Afrasian child-of Asian and black parentage (Bose, 1979). This is a very critical factor-although not always a conscious one-for Asians who make the decision to marry eurogamously. Furthermore, the “marginal” status of Eurasian offspring make for a greater inclination to idealize light skin-as well as more acceptable-because they may be but a shade from the possibility of sharing in the Euro gene pool. As the result of becoming more acceptable, eurogamy among Asian-Americans continues to increase dramatically. Furthermore, such esteemed institutions as the US Bureau of the Census verify the gender factor among Asians who marry eurogamously. In the states with the largest Asian populations-California, New York, and Washington-the combination of Asian-Euro marriages tends to be Asian Female to Euro male (Sung, 1990). The fact that women tend to marry men who are their social and economic superiors may mean that men of color are not considered eligible unless they are endowed with some compensatory trade-off. On the other hand, marriage to Euro-American men is presumed by Asian-American women to lighten their skin psychologically in the present via identification with their spouse and in the future via offspring. If the increasing rate of eurogamy does in fact reflect a disdain for dark skin, the psychological implications may eventually impair Asian self concept. The off-spring of these interracial marriages will be less facilitating to race relations in lieu of the historical concept of European having been defined as “pure” (Grove, 1991). Given the existence of eurogamy as a factor of assimilation, the task is clear. Asian-Americans must idealize and define for themselves the worth of Asian identity. Assimilation into the mainstream must come as the result of an equally valued exchange of culturisms. In the aftermath the process of American assimilation will be enhanced. The process will become more conducive and capable of absorbing the diversity of all people. 407 Eurogamy Among Asian-Americans REFERENCES Alba, R. (1981). The Twilight of Ethnicity among American Catholics of European Ancestry. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 454,8697. Aldridge, D. (1978). Interracial Marriages: Empirical and Theoretical Consideration. Journal of Black Studies, 8(3): 335-368. Allen, W. and J. Jewell. (1995). African American Education since An American Dilemma. Daedalus, 124( 1): 77-100. Ashilova, D. (1971). An Anthropological Description of the Present-Day Kalmyks. Sovetskaya Etnografia, 46(5): 61-74. Bolger, R. (1985). Ethnic Identity and Assimilation: A Seven Generation Irish Canadian Lineage. Central Issues in Anthropolgy, 6( 1): 11-18. Bosse, M. (1979). One Corner of an Indian Slum that is Forever England. New Society, 47(848): 7-9. Coleman, M. (1995). Our Current Human Sacrifice Dramas. Journal of Psychohistory, 22(4): 398-399. Cunningham, K. (1993). Barbie Doll Culture and the American Waistland. Symbolic Interaction, 16(l): 79-83. Grove, K. (1991). Identity Development in Interracial Asian/White Late Adolescents: Must it be so Problematic? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20(6): 617628. Gurak, D. and J. Fitzpatrick. (1982). Intermarriage Among Hispanic Ethnic Groups in New York City. American Journal of Sociology, 87(4): 921-934. Hall, R.E. (1993). Clowns, Buffoons and Gladiators: Media Portrayals of African-American Men. The Journal of Men’s Studies, I(3): 239-25 1. -. (1994). The Bleaching Syndrome: Light Skin, Psychic Conflict and the Domination Model of Western Assimilation. The Indian Journal of Social Work, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Deonar Bombay, India. -. (1995). The Bleachinh Syndrome: African Americans’ Response to Cultural Domination Vis a Vis Skin Color. Journal of Black Studies, 26(2): 172-183. -. (forthcoming). The Complexion Connection. Manuscript submitted for publication. Haslam, N. (1995). Factor Structure of Social Relationships: An Examination of Relational Models and Resource Exchange Theories. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(2): 217-227. Hirschman, C. and M. Wong. (1984). Socioeconomic Gains of Asian Americans, Blacks and Hispanics: 1960-1976. American Journal of Sociology, 90(3): 584-607. Kalmijn, M. (1993). Trends in Black/White Intermarriage. Social Forces, 72(l): 119-146. Kaplan, S. (1990). Historical Efforts to Encourage White Indian Intermarriage in the United States and Canada. International ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

peachblack
School: UT Austin

Please review and let me know if you need any editing.

Running Head: MULTIETHNIC ASIAN AMERICANS

Multiethnic Asian Americans
Student Name
Institution Name

MULTIETHNIC ASIAN AMERICANS
PART II
There has been a change of attitude in terms of race throughout the 20th century in
comparison to yesteryears. During the 19th century, there was high discrimination in terms of the
white and the male privilege since they were dominant in the society. However, with time, the
phenomenon has changed because of the mixing of different attitudes. This is because they had
to experience that life has gone its hierarchies that can be used to shun the taboos that have been
in existence. Through the education male and the whites, they were taught not to recognize their
privileges over their counterparts that are to be accommodative. In the long run, there were
reduced levels of male chauvinistic and embrace of the dark people within society. The white
advantage made them learn that racism is not an aspect that is welcome to the entire society. The
changes were triggered by civilization and sexism (Lensmire et al. 2013). Civilization was all
about people changing the way they used to perceive life in traditional norms. Traditionally
female were weaker beings in the society, making their male counterparts to dominate, thus an
aspect of sexism. Life had to change to accommodate the new changes in attitudes due to the
mixes that have taken place during the new century. Therefore, it is always good to embrace
change for every individual to have a sense of belonging.
Heidi Bub has been identified as multiethnic intelligent Asian. She used to school with a
multiple of the student from all political and racial divide. Her friends were both blacks and
whites, but she never used to refer to them using their skin color; instead, she just referred to
them as friends. Thus alone was sure evidence that she never discriminated her friends and she
was all accommodative. Heidi Bub and Hyun Sook Lee, have different forms of stories that can
be compared. One was a young student, and the other was aged and used to be a tutor and
renowned author of many books. Heidi used to inspire her fellow students through the actions of

2

MULTIETHNIC ASIAN AMERICANS
national unity and reduction of racial discrimination while Hyun inspired many through her
books that promoted cohesion and integration (Lensmire et al. 2013). However, the two were
from different ethnic groups that had to mingle to promote the multiplicity of the ra...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors