Top 10
Disappearing
Futures
A special report by members and friends of
the World Future Society
Contents
1. Intolerance and Misunderstanding���� 23
John M. Smart, Daniel Egger, John F.
Copper, Alan Nordstrom, Jed Diamond
2. Educational Processes.................... 24
Jason Siko, Jason Swanson, Dan Tuuri
Introduction
One of my family’s legends (unverified) was that my great-grandfather
invented the coin-operated newspaper-vending machine. He never patented it, however, so watching the gradual disappearance of this sturdy,
useful invention—first from my apartment building’s lobby, and then from
the sidewalks outside my office—leaves me with no sense of grand, despairing loss. Today, I can read whatever I want digitally, without ever
having to bash a frequently failing machine that eats my quarters.
For me, the saddest loss from my youth is the soda fountain, that countertop fixture in just about every drugstore in the United States a half a
century ago. Folks could have a quick meal of grilled cheese sandwiches
and cherry Cokes, and then buy sundries on the way out. As the car-crazy
nation spread our lifestyles out into suburbs, it became easier and faster to
order food at drive-through windows. Cars with cup holders reigned supreme, and the soda fountain disappeared.
So, what else might disappear in the next 15–20 years? And will we miss
these things much? The loss of newspaper vending machines hasn’t affected our access to news, for instance. Soda fountains were replaced by alternative methods of meal dissemination. But in some cases, things have
disappeared irrevocably and irreplaceably, some for better (smallpox) and
some for worse (passenger pigeons).
One thing we might not see disappear: predictions. Though many futurists believe we would be better off learning to make “robust” decisions
that enable us to adapt and succeed in a variety of potential future scenarios—without benefit of definitive forecasts—humans have always felt a
compulsion to know the future with as much certainty as possible.
And that is why we have gone to members and friends of the World
Future Society, once again, to seek out their informed and eye-opening insights about the future—in this case, the future we may not see.
—Cynthia G. Wagner, editor
3. Europe (Maybe, Maybe Not)............. 26
Manuel Au-Yong Oliveira, Neill Perry
4. Jobs and Workplace Processes......... 27
Thomas Frey, Paul Rux, Carrie Anne Zapka,
Lawrence Loh
5. Stores....................................... 28
Barry Minkin, John P. Sagi
6. Doctors...................................... 29
Joe Thomae, Benjamin C. Yablon, Morton
Chalfy
7. Paper—and the Places It Goes.......... 30
David Pearce Snyder, Lane Jennings, Karl
Albrecht
8. Human Experiences....................... 32
Brenda Cooper, Lisa Gualtieri, Apala Lahiri
Chavan, Richard Yonck, Elizabeth D. Leone
and Jean Georges Perrin, Josh Lindenger,
Michael Rees
9. Smartphones............................... 34
Paul Saffo, Harish Shah, E. Scott Denison,
Alexandre Pupo and William E. Halal, Rob
Bencini, Jim Breaux
10. Insecurity.................................. 36
Tom Schaffnit, Clayton Rawlings, Thomas
Frey, Frank McDonough
More Missing Futures........................ 37
Dave Allman, Douglas Cornish, Peter Eder,
LuAnne Feik, Virginia Holbert, Lester Kuhl,
Jonathan C. Lippe, Werner Mittelstaedt,
Gregory Pashke, Garry Schulz, Alexandru
Tugui, and Ruth Wise
About the Authors............................. 38
22 THE FUTURIST September-October 2013 • www.wfs.org
© 2013 World Future Society • 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 450, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A. • All rights reserved.
1. Intolerance and Misunderstanding
Disappearance of Endangered
Languages, Economic
Immigration Barriers, and
Mass Religious Intolerance
By John M. Smart
The advent of wearable smartphones
could accelerate the disappearance of
endangered languages, but also lowering
of economic barriers and of fundamentalist intolerance.
By 2020, the ubiquity of wearable
smartphones and the power of the
conversational interface will give
youth everywhere “teacherless education”; that is, conversation, both
with remote peers and with the Web
itself.
For kids in developing nations, the
killer app of teacherless education
will be learning a more developed
nation’s language at the same time
they learn their own. Their wearable
will “listen in” as they learn their native language and deliver the same
words in the foreign language of
choice, along with images, learning
aids, and games that test proficiency.
Of the roughly 6,000 languages
spoken today, perhaps 3,000 endangered languages will no longer be
spoken by children in 2030. Most
other languages will have lost users
as well, as the languages of developed nations with the most open
cultures increasingly take their place.
We’ll also see many more scientific,
technical, business, social, and artistic “languages” (knowledge systems)
taught from birth.
English, the global language of
business today, will benefit the most,
bringing English-speaking nations as
many as a billion new “virtual immigrants” by 2030.
In the high-bandwidth 2020s,
many economic barriers to participating in the global economy will
disappear. Eager underemployed
youth anywhere, speaking the same
language and understanding the
same global culture, will be able to
work with large and small compa-
nies everywhere, vastly accelerating innovation and entrepreneurship.
Those who learn English or
another leading language
from birth, rather than relying
on automatic language translation, will gain the greatest
new economic opportunities
and cognitive fluencies. Leading languages have by far the
largest semantic vocabularies, ALLEX MAX / BIGSTOCK
and they allow the learner to
world population reaches a new undeeply understand foreign cultures.
Now for perhaps the most contro- derstanding of social connectivity.
But in this hyperconnected sceversial prediction: As long as global
science, technology, free trade, resil- nario with its streamlined “global”
iency, and wealth continue to accel- communication, fewer people will
erate, as I expect they will, all the be willing to invest time in learning
major religions and ideologies will new languages and cultural immercontinue to grow more ecumenical sion. This unwillingness may then
and secular. Mass fundamentalist re- reduce people’s capacity to observe,
ligious intolerance will disappear. reflect, understand, and respect
Political and religious fundamental- other opinions, leading to new culist backlashes will always be with tural misinterpretation and conflicts.
We may thus see the rise of new
us, but they’ll be increasingly small,
weak, and short-lived, driven as al- conflicts as cultural understanding
ways by short-term catastrophes. disappears. Rather than resolve conflicts, we will merely shift attention
Amen!
away. Rather than improve collaboration, it will change how we judge,
evaluate, and create trust in our relaCounterpoint: Why Cultural
tionships.
Understanding May Disappear
In 2030, we will navigate our social web and filter, judge, ignore, and
By Daniel Egger
classify at high velocity; the risk is
that we will also transform our interIn shared social environments, we pretation into social realities that igcreate a single cognitive and percep- nore cultural contexts.
tive understanding of complexity
through language, words, stories,
music, and other cultural elements.
But this could change. Globalization Vanishing Languages and the
with a “world language” can drive
Rise of English and Chinese
cultural distinctions—and sensitivity
for them—to extinction.
In the mid-2020s, technical barriers By John F. Copper
in speech recognition, translation,
By 2030, more than a third of the
and speech synthesis will not exist
anymore. Real-time mobile lan- world’s estimated 6,000 languages
guage-translation devices are going will have disappeared. First to go
to be available to the mass market. will be those spoken by only a small
By 2030, their world market penetra- number of people. Unwritten lantion will surpass 80%. In this era of guages will also pass early. Other
social connectivity, it will be possible languages, except for two, will expeto access everyone and any informa- rience gradual or rapid disuse.
Most people are increasingly learntion. Without language barriers,
www.wfs.org
•
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
23
ing and using a “dominant” language
such as English and/or Chinese, both
of which are growing fast in terms of
their number of speakers and their
usage in business and science.
English is the language of science
and technology, education, business,
the media, movies, and the global
culture. It is the language of democracy. The English vocabulary is vast
compared to other languages. Some
call it the necessary or indispensable
language.
Chinese is the language of more
people than any other and is becoming an important business language.
China is also excelling in science and
technology, registering more patents
than any country in the world and
publishing more scientific articles.
Many predict that China will be the
world’s dominant economic power
and military power in two or three
decades.
The ability to speak both Chinese
and English would allow one to
communicate with half of the people
on the planet. This figure will grow
to 60% or more in 15 years. At that
time, the dream of a universal language may be upon us.
In the future, linguists and historians will be able to study the extinct
languages, as they will be recorded
and preserved. Bilingualism and
multilingualism will keep the ones
falling into disuse from becoming irrelevant, while most of the planet’s
population will regularly use English or Chinese, or both.
The End of Religion,
The Rise of Spirituality
By Alan Nordstrom
The most revolutionary change
underlying the transformative era in
the next half century is the demise of
religion and the rise of spirituality.
Society will outgrow doctrinaire belief systems accepted on traditional
“faith” and inculcated by authoritarian intimidation.
By 2030, the pervasive power of
communication systems will enable
human beings collectively to achieve
a higher level of common sense, informed by advanced sciences (physi24
THE FUTURIST
cal, social, and spiritual) that make
t h e w o r l d o f 2 0 1 3 s e e m n e o -
Medieval.
We will have stabilized our population sustainably. Our former penchant for exploitation and domination will have been sanitized by
education, informed by humane values promoting cooperation and collaboration on common
interests and mutual
benefits. Aggressive, acquisitive, exploitative
behaviors are deemed
pathological and regressive, even primitive.
Most distinctive in
2030 is the pervasive
kindness and civility of
human behavior. Only a
generation earlier it
would have been ludicrous to suppose that the
outrageous violence of
the 9/11 era could ever
be transcended: ethnic
cleansing, terrorism, financial exploitation, plutocracy. But the “Big
One” finally brought inhumane humanity to its
knees and its senses,
waking us collectively to
our radical sense of kinship and kindness.
Goodbye, Macho Man
By Jed Diamond
For millions of years,
humankind lived in balance with nature, one
voice among many in
the chorus of life. But
gradually we became
disconnected from the
earth and dominant over
it: All other life on the
planet must serve the
needs of humans or die.
In the words of the
philosopher Martin Buber, our relationships
changed from I-Thou
(sustained connections
to the external) to I-It
(separated from the external). Using increas-
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
ingly destructive methods of violence, macho man rose to the top.
Cut off from his own feelings, he
could more easily control nature,
other men, women, and children.
But this I-It relationship to the
world is not only destructive to the
life spirit, it is also unsustainable.
When macho man lives as though he
2. Educational Processes
Disappearing Public Education
By Jason Siko
Public schools are privatizing, and new
ways of mastering and assessing the
attainment of knowledge and skills are
replacing the factory model of education.
Public education in the United
States will have all but disappeared
by 2030, beginning with the primary
and secondary systems that have
been in place since the end of the
nineteenth century. The decline of
the public tertiary educational system will take longer, but will be due
to the same factors.
Technology will help to destroy the
long-held traditions of grouping students by age. Smart systems will allow us to solve educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom’s “Two-Sigma
Dilemma,” where education progresses through mastery learning and
individualized instruction based on
quality data analytics. As students
progress, they are allowed to specialize earlier and earlier (much like athletics today)—so much so that no one
has a generalized diploma, only certificates of competencies in skills that
the workforce demands.
While this sounds desirable, the
process was handed over to a select
few companies that were directed to
maintain the status quo by the elite.
This change was facilitated by the
United States’ inability to fund public education, as state budgets con-
were separate from nature, thinking
he could rule the world, it is like the
brain thinking it could rule the body,
demanding all the life-giving blood.
“To hell with the kidneys, the lungs,
or the spleen,” the head says. “I’m
the most important organ in the
body and I want more, more, more.”
Macho man is on his way out. The
I-Thou man is replacing him, and
there is a chance for humanity to return to a way of life that has sustained us for millions of years. Locally sustainable earth communities
are emerging throughout the world,
and men are learning to be kind to
themselves, each other, and the wonderful planet we all share.
tinued to fail to generate the necessary revenue for all public services.
Like current U.S. telecommunications and postal delivery systems,
what the government initially set up
will be handed over to three or four
major companies. They will provide
instruction and training online based
on regional demand trends and forecasts from corporations in a particular geographic region. In addition,
they will provide site-based technical and pedagogical support; the local companies will purchase the old
school buildings to generate revenue
for the state and convert them to tutoring stations and early childhood
daycare facilities.
While students could specialize
and obtain employment (which lowers unemployment numbers significantly), their choices are limited;
thus, upward mobility becomes
nearly impossible.
tion. Advances in
technology like
learning analytics
will allow educators
t o p ro c e s s l a rg e
amounts of data on
students in order to
get insights into
how students learn
best.
These are signposts that point to a
shift away from the
mass-production
education model
and toward a future
in which each student’s educational
experience is truly
individualized and
tailored to how he
or she learns best.
Education Abandons the
Factory Model
By Jason Swanson
In the list of things that may potentially disappear by 2030, we
might also include ways of doing
things, or processes. And one process that could potentially disappear
is the factory model of education, or
the idea of “one size fits all.”
There is already a strong case for
this process to disappear in the
future. Ideas such as an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for every
student have garnered a lot of atten-
The End of Grade
Point Averages
FRANCESCO SANTALUCIA / BIGSTOCK
By Dan Tuuri
In 2030, the grade point average
(GPA) will no longer be the primary
instrument to validate academic
achievement.
The GPA is based upon the value
that an instructor has provided a student. In many institutions, instructors define their own valuation of
how points are distributed, in some
instances with certain categories
having little to do with the actual
learning achieved. Furthermore,
some instructors face pressures to inflate grades.
www.wfs.org
•
In recent years, even the U.S. government began to call for independent
third-party testing of some programming. The inclusion of this data provided reference points of independent
data that instructional staff could utilize for course and program improvement and could further develop comparative data between institutions.
Recently, the concept of badges
has also taken off. I believe we will
continue to see these developed.
Noted endorsements of specific
skills that a person would need for
success are much more valuable than
a single identified reference.
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
25
3. Europe (Maybe,
Maybe Not)
A World without a
Unified Europe
By Manuel Au-Yong Oliveira
Long-term culture change will be
needed to hold Europe together
till 2030.
The European Union will
have to change a great deal if
it is still to be around in 2030,
but no one is currently focusing on the changes necessary
to make the EU a success. In
business mergers, attention
to the differences in the organizational cultures of the
merging companies is at the
forefront of managerial concerns. But this has not been JAM-DESIGN.CZ / BIGSTOCK
the case in the European
merger.
The European Union is basically a more socially oriented values, while
merger of very diverse nations and southern European countries confaces the same kinds of issues as verge to take a more assertive
companies do: How can we get dif- stance?
ferent countries—where people with
As Nobel Prize–winning econovery different values, attitudes, and mist Douglass C. North has said,
beliefs live—to pool together their structural and institutional change
unique knowledge capital to make cannot be disassociated from longthe merger a success?
term culture change. This is where
For instance, is it fair to say that Europe needs to focus its attention,
highly assertive “Type A” Germans before it is too late for the dream of a
think and act differently from the prosperous, long-lasting, unified
“Type B” French, Italians, Irish, Europe.
Finns, and Portuguese (to use the
classification by Deanne N. Den
H artog)? Ideally, these countries
Counterpoint: Europe,
would have similar economic as well
Tear Down Your Borders
as social behaviors.
To lead Europe out of its predicament, a new vision is called for. Only By Neill Perry
with a far-reaching common culture
By 2030, with the advent of the
will different governments and the
people they represent share the view euro as a multinational currency, the
that, for the union to prosper and to economic and commercial relationhave a sustainable future, they have ship among the nations of Europe
to put in at least as much as they will have changed. Restrictions on
trade are eliminated, helping raise
want to take out.
What should a European culture, the economic condition of the poorer
common across its borders, look and countries. This eliminates the need
feel like? Will northern European for formal borders between them,
countries need to soften toward and as a result, a new central gov26
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
ernment, United Europe, emerges.
The old national borders serve as a
way to maintain their history, cultural roots, and social distinction.
Over the years, the differences between individual nations have dissipated. Merged into one larger central government, the former nations
are now independent provinces with
democratically elected officials who
represent them in the central government of United Europe. With the
elimination of the former borders
and a common language, United Europeans have more freedom and
independence.
The combined resources increase
United Europe’s economic and political clout, allowing it to compete
against technological and industrial
giants like the United States and
China. The nations that meld into
one larger country of United Europe
strengthen their ability to provide
products and services, raise their
standard of living, and gain commercial and political influence
globally.
4. Jobs and Workplace Processes
Two Billion Jobs to
Disappear by 2030
By Thomas Frey
As technologies disrupt economies, jobs
will disappear. But learning new skills will
keep people in business.
By 2030, more than 2 billion jobs
will disappear, roughly 50% of all
the jobs on the planet. This is not intended as a doom and gloom scenario, but rather as a wakeup call for
the new skillsets we’ll need in the
future.
According to McKinsey’s Global
Institute, 12 disruptive technologies
are at the heart of this disruption:
mobile Internet, automation of
knowledge and work, Internet of
things, cloud technology, advanced
robotics, autonomous and near-
autonomous vehicles, next-generation genomics, energy storage, 3-D
printing, advanced materials, advanced oil and gas exploration and
recovery, and renewable energy.
Pay very close attention to these 12
technologies. They will be both the
job destroyers and the job creators in
our future. Here are a few examples
of how this will occur:
• Driverless cars will be on the
verge of eliminating millions of
driver positions. Buses, taxis, trucks,
limos, UPS, FedEx, and more will be
transitioning into driverless forms of
themselves. At the same time, we’ll
see a dwindling of parking lots, gas
stations, traffic cops, and traffic
courts, and fewer doctors and nurses
will be needed to treat injuries.
• Education will see a mass transition from teaching to coaching, as
90% of all traditional classes will
take place online by 2030, even in
K-12.
• 3-D printers will disrupt
everything from manufacturing, to
health care, to retail, to art, to construction and building materials.
Printed clothing and shoes produced
at the store you’re shopping in will
replace garment districts around the
world. Printed buildings and houses
will eliminate the need for contractors and building materials. Pill printers will replace entire pharmacies.
• Automated manufacturing is already eliminating tons of jobs. Bots
and drones will begin disrupting
many other industries along with
their base of employment.
At the same time that billions of
jobs are disappearing, we will be creating billions more. But to do so, we
will need to streamline our systems
and prepare for the skill sets and job
demands of tomorrow.
Whither the Board of Directors?
The Coming Demise of
Teamwork
By Lawrence Loh
By Paul Rux
In his classic 2001 study Free Agent
Nation, Daniel Pink observed a
growing trend toward solo practi
tioners instead of teams. He foresaw
how relentless changes in technology and corporate greed would
combine to reduce workers en masse
to the level of office temps. It is hard
to build teamwork around workers
who constantly come and go. Despite a pop culture that lauds teamwork in sports, this is not the emerging workplace reality.
So forget teamwork. Instead,
coach creative “stars.” The powerful
trend toward freelance workplaces
signals the coming demise of teamwork. Get ready to move, re-skill,
and coach innovative individuals as
leaders.
Obsolescence of Fixed
Pay-Per-Time Compensation
By Carrie Anne Zapka
Only museums will display
punch-in time clocks. Future historians will view this artifact as a failed
attempt to mechanize human behavior—an unfortunate result of the Industrial Revolution. Without punchclocks, neither performance nor
www.wfs.org
compensation will be correlated to
time.
Dynamic pay-per-task networks
will replace fixed annual salaries and
hourly pay rates. Work will be negotiated between temporal workers
and “workees”—those for whom
work is performed. Compensation
will be volatile. Real-time supply
and demand, crowd reputation ratings, experience points, and recommendation networks will replace
résumés and job titles.
•
Gone will be the days when a seat on
a company’s board of directors carries
a sense of prestige, a sign of arrival,
and a sure way to make big bucks.
Over recent decades, a spate of
corporate governance disasters has
triggered fast and furious regulatory
reforms, such as the U.K. Cadbury
Report in 1992 and the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. Both of
these have resulted in a significant
tightening up of requirements, especially for being a company director.
Many qualified and experienced
personnel will thus no longer want
to be directors, as the risks and liabilities are getting just too high and
not worth the time and effort for the
returns. And that is the hollowing
out of the supply of directors.
The corporate sector should go
back to the basics. Stakeholders, especially investors, must take the
company back from the directors,
who are at present not necessarily
selected by or even serving the interest of investors.
Instead of the board, companies
will experience investor activism in
the form of direct corporate democracy. Investors will themselves elect
representative, council-like mechanisms to take charge of corporate
governance.
Companies will be too important
to be left to boards of directors,
which will disappear by 2030.
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
27
5. Stores
Locations, Locations, Locations
By Barry Minkin
All the prime retail spots will be taken,
but new distribution opportunities will
emerge.
By 2030, the best locations for retailers around the world will have
been found and occupied.
You can already find a Big Mac or
Starbucks coffee even in the most remote corners of the world. By 2030,
companies will be looking for innovative low-cost distribution opportunities. For example, since Starbucks
controls the retail locations, are there
profitable opportunities to control
the many beverage cart locations?
Innovative marketing channels
will be the key to success. For instance, there are not a lot of candy
stores in Russia, so Mars put kiosks
in places like Red Square to sell its
products. Gillette uses suppliers
with trays around their necks to sell
its blades in India.
There are also opportunities to sell
many other products once you have
developed distribution channels.
Colgate distributes more than 173
products in more than 50 countries,
and some of these products are manufactured by other companies.
Of course, the Internet will continue to help put “going out of business” signs in the store windows of
retailers in marginal locations.
“Mommy, What’s a Store?”
Consumerism in the Connected
Age
By John P. Sagi
For Christmas shoppers at big
stores, the most popular toys fly off
the shelves—Furby, Monster High
Dolls, Angry Birds, Legos. Parents
frantically use their iPhones to check
other stores and eBay for availability
(and better prices), then leave the
28
THE FUTURIST
NMEDIA / BIGSTOCK
store to make the purchase.
In the future, these toys will be replaced, but even bigger change is
coming to the process of shopping.
For example, my spouse recently
went shopping for an iPhone. The
Verizon store in the local mall had
the very version of the phone she desired. The clerk then explained that
her new phone was “being configured and on its way from the Midwest.” We couldn’t take our purchase home with us—it wasn’t even
available in the store.
Stores are gradually becoming
mere demonstration places, due to
several forces: 3-D printing allows
localized and instant manufacturing;
radio frequency identification (RFID)
tracks products at every stage; rapid
transport and augmented reality
promise overnight delivery (soon
perhaps via drones). Our central-
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
ized, connected cities keep us ever
local, and e-commerce connects us.
By 2030, shoppers will not use
“stores” as we know them, but may
visit membership-accessed “Demo
Docks.” Beginning with items such
as electronics and clothing, you’ll
browse online for specifications, capability, and pricing; you’ll then visit
a local dock to “play” with the product using augmented-reality tools.
These demo docks will market our
favorite brands, and robots will
show the items or clothes, very accurately responding to our questions.
No expensive stock is on site, saving
space and insurance costs. Completing the purchase online, the customer returns home, and the item arrives on the doorstep the next
morning. No backorders, and no
fights for the last “Furby”:
Everything is available.
6. Doctors, Surgeons, and “Diagnostic Arts”
Disappearing Doctors
By Joe Thomae
Adults will no longer need to visit a doctor’s office for routine checkups.
By 2030, adult visits to a doctor for
an annual physical, blood cholesterol
screening, exams for prostate or
breast cancer, and many other important but nonemergency consultations will be a thing of the past.
Several trends will drive this
change:
1. Technology will enable an accurate and personalized diagnosis in
your own home. The ubiquity of
smartphones and sensors tied to
cloud computing will allow screening for chemical indicators for cancer, blood glucose and oxygenation
levels, EKG, respiration rate, heart
attack and stroke precursors, and
more. The information will upload
into a personal medical database,
and no human will ever see it until
your database alerts your doctor that
something is amiss.
2. Patients will, after initial privacy
concerns abate, begin to understand
that regular, consistent monitoring of
many health indicators will act in
their favor, preserving good health
and indicating potential catastrophic
conditions.
3. Insurers will price policies and
make coverage conditional on the
use of this system of monitoring and
detection.
4. The efficient economics of this
system address the cost implications
of socialized medicine and the looming doctor deficit.
The public-health benefits begin to
become evident as daily, real-time
reporting of conditions like typical
flu symptoms will aid in the delivery
of medicines and enable people to
avoid interactions where they might
either become ill or spread their own
illnesses.
Users will be alerted to issues via
algorithms that scan daily test results. Computers may send simple
text questions to obtain more infor-
mation; if that questioning cannot resolve the
issue, the computer will
schedule an examination
with an appropriate specialist.
This system will not
likely be used for early
childhood pediatric exams, but parents will use
the same daily monitor- DMITRIY SHIRONOSOV / BIGSTOCK
ing hardware and software on children. This allows us to tures as possible will be built into
catch childhood maladies early and these new medical service models,
will allow new parents to gain valu- but it may always be better to have
surgeons and patients in close proxable insights related to child care.
imity, robotic assistant or not.
The doctor shortage is largely due
Operating without Surgeons
to the fact that talented people who
could be doctors are moving into
By Benjamin C. Yablon
fields in which their skills can be
more richly rewarded. By 2030, only
By 2030, America will be 150,000 the privileged will actually have
doctors short, just as the median age their surgeons in the operating
of the country’s baby boomers hits rooms with them; the rest of us had
72. A voracious consumption of better hope for highly stable commuhealth care will far eclipse what can nication grids.
reasonably be provided by the current distribution model, but technological solutions are ready to fill the
The End of the Art of
void.
Today, there are more than 200 Medical Diagnosis
robot-assisted da Vinci Surgical Systems deployed across the United By Morton Chalfy
States. Also in use are products such
For centuries, medical diagnosis
as the Socrates Robotic Telecollaboration System, which allows shared has been an art more than a science.
control of robotic surgical assistants In the hands of its finest practition
operating from different locations. ers, the art has saved lives and
These machines dramatically de- averted disasters; in the hands of the
crease the invasiveness of many pro- less than great, it has caused unneccedures, greatly improving recovery essary procedures, intense discomtimes. By 2030, this technology will fort, and sometimes death.
Art will succumb to science as the
be ubiquitous, allowing sought-after
surgeons to perform procedures all massive power of machines like
over the world without having to IBM’s Watson enable computers to
learn from repetition. Over the next
leave their offices.
There are some obvious draw- decades, medical records will be fed
backs to having your surgeon work- into “Doctor” Watson’s memory
ing in a distant location. For in- banks, and diagnosis will become
stance, what if the cardiologist scientific and statistical.
Physicians will be able to do away
performing your heart transplant
lives in California and an earthquake with guesswork and prescriptions of
hits, interrupting her connection “Let’s try this and see if it works,”
with the robotic assistant whose me- and go right to “This is the likeliest
chanical fingers are in your chest? As diagnosis and this is the likeliest
many safety and redundancy fea- treatment for best effect.”
www.wfs.org
•
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
29
7. Paper—and the Places It Goes
Paperless, Cashless, and
Wireless by 2030
By David Pearce Snyder
A futurist ponders the fate of his data
when the world is finally paperless.
I am a data-based forecaster, and
for over half a century all of that
data has been on paper. My colleagues and I learned about futures
methodologies by reading print-onpaper books and professional journals, and we kept up with futureshaping trends and developments by
reading magazines and newspapers,
think tank reports, and tomes by
policy wonks—all on paper, from
which relevant material was clipped
or copied and filed.
The long-term consequence of our
paper-based operation is immediately apparent to anyone entering
my office. The countertops are
stacked with file folders in piles two
to three feet high, over which rise
bookcases filled with more files. On
my desk, a dozen more piles of paper cover most of the surface.
Most futurists I’ve met have offices that look very much like mine.
But all of us also understand that, by
2030, all that paper will be gone.
I’m having trouble dealing with
that reality. Having all my information literally within arm’s reach has
been the mainstay of my professional practice. With my paper data-
base, I know exactly—and feel kinesthetically—where all my facts are. To
be equally certain of finding that
same information in cyberspace
would require me to master an entirely new set of skills. It would also
require a level of confidence in information technology that I do not yet
possess.
Information and communication
are dematerializing. Paper money
will also disappear by 2030, and I’m
perfectly prepared to live in a cashless future. Commerce will be cashless, phones will be wireless, and
print will be paperless.
I am prepared to live with the first
two of those future realities. But I
still find it hard to accept that I will
no longer be surrounded by my
© MICHAEL VENTURA
Futurist David Pearce Snyder in his office.
30
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
easy-to-access, user-friendly paper
database.
The Private Library
By Lane Jennings
Even 10 years ago it would have
been inconceivable, but the evidence
is growing and the trend seems
clear: Instead of owning works that
bring us knowledge, delight our
senses, and stimulate our dreaming,
we will soon become mere “borrowers” sucking on an electronic straw.
My father collected books. Most of
these simply interested him, a few directly helped in his profession, and
the rest were useful reference volumes—dictionaries, encyclopedias,
and bibliographies. But then encyclopedias and dictionaries were reduced
from print to floppy disks; ultimately,
they were rendered redundant by online sources more complete and current than any book could be.
Without a multivolume set of The
Great Books, a well-thumbed copy of
Webster’s International Dictionary, or
the Encyclopaedia Britannica in my
living room, how will anyone know
that I am still a scholar and a gentleman? Or will those terms themselves
have become obsolete?
O tempora, o mores, oh bother!
Paper Here Today,
Gone Tomorrow
By Karl Albrecht
Communication has been digitizing inexorably, but not completely,
for the past four decades. By 2030,
we may finally see the disappearance of:
• The U.S. Postal Service and Local Post Offices. The USPS is a classic example of a long-term “sitting
duck” extinction. Decades ago,
Sears, Roebuck & Co. left the mailorder catalog business, and “COD”
(cash on delivery) service by the local post offices went with it. Private
firms like Mailboxes Etc., FedEx,
UPS, DHL, and others began stealing the business. Then technologies
LARRY MALVIN / BIGSTOCK
like the fax machine and then e-mail
radically reduced the mailing of
business letters. Most residential
mail now consists of junk mail and
bills; both are being steadily replaced by electronic options.
• The Personal Check. Businesses
spend billions of dollars annually to
bill their customers and process the
checks they mail. Electronic billing
and online payments are slashing
costs for both. The few customers who
hold out will probably have to pay
penalty fees for printed documents.
• The Newspaper. Two forces will
probably make the newspaper as we
know it extinct. One is the information glut that is changing the reading
habits of consumers; the other is the
flight of advertising revenues to Internet monopoly sites like Google,
Facebook, Yahoo, and others. Attention spans are shrinking, information
bites are getting smaller, and people
seeking information expect it to be
instantaneous. As conventional
newspapers die or migrate to online
platforms, publishers will try to develop pay-per-view models that reclaim their revenue streams. We may
see the emergence of dynamically
packaged online newspapers that
compile stories, articles, and advertisements to suit the viewer’s unique
preference profile.
• The Magazine. Ditto what’s happening to newspapers. All popular
magazines now have online versions, many for free. Most are struggling to maintain readership and
subscription revenues, and online
advertising has stolen a large part of
traditional ad revenue. With a vast
range of blogs, online news pages,
streaming video, and online games,
www.wfs.org
•
the general public may be approaching a saturation point for information. Dynamic packaging of content
will probably become the primary
model for magazines as well as
newspapers.
• The Book. The physical book
may not go extinct completely, because it offers certain subjective experiences not replicated exactly by
electronic media. However, as publishers offer e-books at lower prices,
and e-readers become cheaper and
more available, e-books will almost
certainly outnumber physical books.
The two will probably co-exist. Selfpublishing will probably continue to
grow rapidly. Video books, or “vbooks,” with chaptered video content presented in digital format, may
also become popular, especially for
educational purposes. Some physical
book publishers, however, will probably go extinct because they fail to
make the wrenching transition to a
new and more risky publishing and
distribution model.
• The Greeting Card. Ounce for
ounce, the traditional printed greeting card is one of the most ecologically wasteful products that people
buy. The average useful life of a
greeting card is about 15 seconds—
perhaps a few minutes if it gets
passed around at a party. Then it
usually goes into the waste stream,
or a bottomless drawer. As with
books, cards might survive if they
can be “repurposed,” or used to provide some additional value. Reusable greeting cards, for example,
might become popular. Perhaps the
card can be made edible, or even
biodegradable, with seeds attached
so it can give birth to a garden plant.
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
31
8. Human Experiences
The End of Anonymity
By Brenda Cooper
Living off society’s “grid” is getting
harder. We may give up trying to live our
quiet, anonymous lives.
Today, our paychecks generally
show up in our banks without
touching our hands. We leave creditcard trails behind us, and our
phones constantly beam our location
to nearby cell towers so we can be
helped in an emergency. But the average person we pass on the street
may know nothing about us; to learn
more, they need only obtain partial
information and pay some money.
Anonymity is tough, but it’s still
possible to live off of the grid, even
in developed countries—as long as
you use cash for housing and food
and don’t fly on a commercial airline. An anonymous lifestyle is certainly not for the faint of heart, but
it’s possible.
It will be far harder to remain
anonymous in a cashless society
with multifactor logons to
everything and
biometric data
that every public camera in
the world can
access. The loss
of anonymity
will hopefully
cause increased
accountability,
decreased rates
of many crimes,
and a culture
that is more
careful.
We will know
more about
each other, and
it will be up to
us as a society TATIANA GLADSKIKH / BIGSTOCK
to choose how
personal data is treated or mistreated. Not long from now, the difficult job of staying off the grid will be
close to impossible for all but the ultra-rich (who may still be able to use
personal assistants and shadow
companies to stay partly invisible).
To navigate this future, we’ll
need to assure that single mistakes don’t haunt people forever.
We’ll need to find a way for financial details, health issues, and
bedroom choices to remain
cloaked. We need to become pre-
Bad Mood Is History: A Scenario
I awaken in a bad mood. The
bed is empty next to me and I suspect Liz is working again. She
works too much. Without opening
my eyes, I know it’s time to get up.
Every morning, at 7 o’clock, the
windows change from light-blocking to transparent. The late autumn
sun fills the room. I peruse some
wardrobe choices, my virtual mirror
reflecting my image in each selection. I wait for my choice to rotate
toward the front of the rack and
proceed with my morning ablutions.
As I head downstairs, our garden
appears through the walls. The fall
colors warm me. The walls appear
32
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
completely transparent with the
thin layer of LED. I open the window and the curtains billow in the
fall breeze. It took some time to get
used to seeing the curtains suspended in midair, like some domestic apparition. Now, I barely notice. I breathe in the fresh morning
scent.
As I move into the kitchen, news
begins to flow on the walls. CNN
knows my bad mood and sticks to
light news. Madonna and Mick Jagger are going to have a baby. At
past 70, Madonna says she feels
vital and invigorated to be pregnant
at the same time as her grand-
•
www.wfs.org
daughter. With a life expectancy of
110 and the support of her record
label, she is thrilled to bring a new
pop sensation into the world.
My thoughts of children have
prompted the walls to display images of my sons as babies, toddlers, and eventually young men.
Emotions flow. The warmth begins
to repel this bad mood.
With freshly brewed tea (my custom blend) in hand, I find my way
to the office. Liz is indeed working.
She smiles as I walk to her. We
kiss tenderly. This is going to be
another great day.
—Liz Leone and Jean Georges Perrin
pared for our lives to be open
electronic books.
The Death of Reflection
By Lisa Gualtieri
I love my smartphone as much as
the next person and rely upon the
immediacy of information access in
my busy life. Is there a downside to
this for me and for our society? Yes:
the death of reflection.
Being almost constantly connected—and agitated when not connected—means losing those moments when disparate ideas come
together, when pleasant memories
lead to inspiration, or when pondering a problem leads to innovation.
Accessing and using too much information all the time stifles reflection
and all of its benefits.
Fitness, I believe, offers the solution of listening to one’s body, which
is the antithesis of the quantified-self
movement in which everything is
tracked. When I run, I can feel last
night’s overindulgence or, equally,
last night’s eight hours of sleep. But
all the devices to track where I am—
my pace, the comparison to other
women my age or my last run—distract me from the reflective process
that often leads to great work after
my run.
Letting one’s mind wander and reflecting on both one’s internal
thoughts and feelings and the external world leads to great ideas—and
by that I don’t mean just new and
better devices.
No More Waiting
By Apala Lahiri Chavan
Waiting will disappear by 2030.
The concept of having to wait for
something or someone is increasingly shifting to another verb,
unwaiting.
We once waited for the bank to
open in the morning to be able to
transfer money; waited for answers
to our letters that arrived by post/
courier; waited to travel to a shop-
ping area, or even to a specific country/city to buy particular items.
Or we waited in queues till we got
to the front of the queue. We waited
at airports till it was time to board
the flight. And then waited in court
for the next step in the process to
happen, whether a property dispute
or a divorce proceeding.
There is no waiting anymore, really. The 24/7 access to the Internet
via different devices means that we
can do our money transfers at any
time of the day or night, can shop for
that specific item of clothing online
whenever we want to. So whether
we are at the airport or in the courthouse, we are not really waiting. We
are immersed in a digital world doing other things, like e-mailing, reading news, watching a show, or shopping.
Very soon, the “intelligent cloud”
that always knows us will constantly
serve suggestions based on our profile and location. And 3-D printers
will help enable instant wish fulfillment. What will we need to wait for?
Whatever Happened to
Free Will?
By Richard Yonck
Is free will disappearing? Are you
reading this sentence because a
chain of events going all the way
back to the Big Bang set in motion
everything that led up to this moment? Whether you agree with this
premise or not, were you destined to
do so?
The concepts of free will and determinism have long been debated
by philosophers. Logically, if the universe is governed by a great chain of
cause and effect events, then it seems
plausible that, given sufficient
knowledge and computing power,
we would be able to state every subsequent event at any point in time.
Of course, this runs counter to our
intuition and experience. The
world—not to mention the universe—is so vast in its scale, complexity, and randomness that such
notions seem naïve.
It may be that we’ll soon discover
just how much free will we actually
www.wfs.org
•
have. As our technological world becomes increasingly intelligent, we
find ourselves at a threshold. The Internet of Things, smart dust, embedded intelligence—everything that
contributes to our increasingly smart
environment—combined with data
mining and statistical analysis, herald a new era that may challenge our
notions about free will and determinism.
As ever more information about
our actions becomes available from
our environment, the ability to
anticipate the statistical likelihood of
our movements, our decisions, even
our thoughts becomes possible.
Which brings us to the question: Did
we choose this path? Or were we
destined to take it?
Losing the Ability to Get Lost
By Josh Lindenger
Humans are inherently curious.
We have to explore. We are driven to
figure out who we are and how we
relate to everything around us.
Over the last two decades, we’ve
h a d a re v o l u t i o n i n m a p p i n g
through the growth of localization
technologies. Global navigation satellites, Wi-Fi based positioning, algorithms that map us around traffic—
in the developed world, at least,
location has become a given.
By 2030, with the continual expansion of these technologies, getting
lost will have all but disappeared.
Whatever the interface ends up being at the time, we’ll be technologically tied to physical space at all
times. Want to go somewhere? Paths
present themselves to you.
But what if we want to get lost?
Will we miss the serendipity of new
experiences? We humans have a
need to explore, to fuel our curiosity
and understand more about ourselves by experiencing new things.
In losing our ability to get lost, we
may rediscover in ourselves a new
wanderlust: that, in the end, we not
only want to get lost sometimes, but
need to because it’s part of what
makes us human.
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
33
9. Smartphones
Farewell, Smartphone.
We Hardly Knew Thee
By Paul Saffo
Devices will be superfluous in the moreintimate age of conversational interaction.
Looking back from 2030, it is hard
to imagine just how central smartphones were to life in 2013—and
how quickly they disappeared.
Smartphones followed a trajectory
similar to that other techno-antique,
the PC, but the smartphone arc was
even shorter.
The first smartphones appeared in
the mid-1990s, but it was Android
and iPhone that changed the communications landscape. By 2010, anything with a physical keypad seemed
as obsolete as a rotary-dial Princess
phone, and voice took a back seat to
apps, Angry Birds, and tweets.
I ro n i c a l l y, i t w a s
voice that killed the
smartphone. Robust
AI-based voice recognition started to arrive in
the mid-teens, and users discovered what
they knew all along:
We would much rather
talk than tap. Driving
d i re c t i o n s w e re s o
much safer when spoken, allowing drivers
to keep their eyes on
the road. Tweet-sized
quips were now uttered by AIs mimicking
the voices of the celebrity dead. Even commerce became voicebased.
Robust voice eliminated the need
to design around screens, just as
t o u c h - s c re e n t e c h n o l o g y o n c e
pushed out keypads. Communicators shrank to the size of hearing
Say Goodbye to News at 6:00
Most Americans migrated to cable television from broadcast television; now, many are cutting the television cord altogether. We watch
what we want, when we want, using Hulu or Netflix or other content
delivery media. And we watch wherever we happen to be, using laptops, tablets, and smartphones.
And advertising dollars that used to go to the networks are now going to social media delivered over mobile devices.
The major networks will likely survive, probably becoming subsidiaries of one of the social network juggernauts (Google, Facebook, etc.),
much like ABC network is part of Disney-ABC Television Group. What
is becoming expendable—and will likely disappear—is the networks’
strings of local affiliates.
These outlets are largely repeater stations of their larger networks.
Except for their morning and evening newscasts, they provide little
that is substantially different from the network’s product.
The 6 o’clock local news once had the advantage of timing over
newspaper delivery; now, it is behind virtually every other means of
communication. The nearly 900 local TV affiliates just aren’t needed in
the new mass communication marketplace. And despite how essential
they seemed for all these decades, when they finally go away their
collective presence will hardly be missed.
—Rob Bencini
34
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
SCOTT GRIESSEL / BIGSTOCK
aids, and their functionality melted
into everything from eyeglasses,
watches, and jewelry to vehicles and
appliances. New functions such as
breathtakingly accurate real-time
language translation appeared (think
Babel fish in Doug Adams’s Hitchhiker’s Guide), making these tiny devices
essential and constant companions.
Screens remained, but only as marvelous peripherals, not the center of
communications activity.
We entered the age of conversational interaction, and our relationship with digital technology moved
from personal to intimate. Couples
who couldn’t speak a common language fell in love and married. Sociologists cautioned users against
over-attachment to voice-AIs to the
exclusion of human contact. And at
those rare moments when we happen to think back, we marvel that
anyone could have ever communicated anything of consequence on a
device as clunky and old-fashioned
as an iPhone.
Computing’s Future Is Wearable
By Harish Shah
Thanks to Google, the world will
soon see the commercialization of
the first wearable computer for the
masses, with a head-mounted display to be worn like a pair of glasses
by its users. Apple is also likely to
soon release a wearable computer in
the form of a smart watch, which has
already been dubbed by many as the
“iWatch.”
The same Internet-based communication currently used on smartphones or computers will likely also
be utilized on the wearable computers. The need for smartphones will
thus simply start diminishing, especially as prices for wearables begin
to decline. That the wearable will
primarily be a computer, beyond being just a communication device,
will be its most attractive feature.
The first few years that wearable
computers are on the market will
likely be a phase of trial and error,
when makers will be perfecting their
technology, adjusting to the market,
and meeting consumer needs and
wants. Once this phase passes, we
can expect history then to repeat itself, and our beloved smartphones
will simply fade away, like pagers
and other devices did before them.
The Concurrent Evaporation of
Hardware and Privacy
By E. Scott Denison
Hold in your hand for a moment
the sleek minimalist design that is
your smartphone. Note the thin
metal case, and touch the glossy,
glass interface.
If you like that sort of thing, then
you should keep it around as an
heirloom. By 2030, we will have dispensed with much of the hardware
that we carry with us, including
phones and laptops, car keys or key
fobs, possibly even digital cameras.
All these devices will move from
silicon chips encased in industrial
designs to smart surfaces, smart
clothing, or biomechanically engineered microcomputers that have
been implanted in or attached to the
body. Retinal implants or contact
lenses will carry the visual interface
to the individual, or the user will
transfer it to a variety of other “active surfaces” such as tables or walls.
Each app will carry its own em-
Highway Signs
In 2030, the ubiquitous fixed roadway sign will have all but disappeared. This scenario begins in the late 2010s, as attention turns to
decaying infrastructure. Thanks to increasing federal tax revenues
driven by the shale oil boom, state departments of transportation will
begin funding projects to replace bridges, repave highways, and (as
an unexpected consequence) replace and update fixed-message
signs.
Cars are becoming increasingly connected to their surroundings via
GPS. The Internet of Place—connecting vehicles to traffic and roadway condition reporting systems—will emerge first in the more dense
urban areas. Better information means there could even be fewer vehicles involved.
The old signs could be replaced by active media signs equipped
with two-way communications that interact with the vehicles (rather
than the drivers). These active-media posts might be updated via fiber-optic links. Some of their graphics could be sponsored by local
enterprises, thus putting an end to billboards as well as roadway
signs.
—Jim Breaux
bedded interface and, though true
telepathy will still be a couple of
decades away, gloves, rings, or
bracelets could become the access
point for manipulating the user interface. It may someday give way to
subdermal implants that directly access brain imagery and transmissions to the microchips that are embedded in our bodies.
As our computers become more
invisible and hardware design becomes more bio-design, we will also
see our privacy nearly completely
disappear. Each surface will become
“aware” of our presence and our activities. Our bodies will carry an internal GPS tracking capability. Watch
out for intrusive messaging, hacking,
and surveillance that may come ever
so much closer to our thoughts, actions, preferences, and individuality.
Passing of the Dumb Interface,
Keyboard, and Mouse
Ongoing trend analysis at the
TechCast Project suggests that the
•
Advanced IT Technologies
Entering Mainstream Use
Most Likely
Year
Std.
Dev.
Intelligent
Interface
2019
4 years
Intelligent
Web
2017
3 years
Virtual Reality
2019
4 years
Thought
Power
2024
7 years
AI
2024
8 years
Technology
Source: www.TechCast.org (2013)
By Alexandre Pupo and
William Halal
www.wfs.org
next wave of computerization will
drive far more intelligent and convenient interfaces into mainstream use,
relegating today’s dumb interfaces,
keyboards, and the mouse obsolete—like the old slide rules and
typewriters. Here is a summary of
our forecasts in this area:
Humans may soon rely on these
technologies to serve as virtual assistants and to automate routine mental
work. Artificial intelligence, speech
and emotion recognition and transla-
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
35
tion, touch controls, and other interfaces are already entering the
market.
In some cases, we can extend the
power of sheer thought to communicate at a distance. Experiments are
finding ways that allow individuals
to direct their thoughts into electrical
signals that communicate silently
with computers, robots, and other
people.
Graphical interfaces, digital
games, and augmented reality are
converging to immerse us in artificial environments that simulate sensory experiences. Other trends show
that the Web is evolving into an intelligent system that understands
spoken inquiries, gathers relevant
information, and forms meaningful
answers.
Today’s dumb interfaces will soon
give way to touch, voice, avatars,
language translation, augmented reality, and thought. An earlier TechCast study dubbed this virtual lifestyle “TeleLiving.”
10. Insecurity
Car Crashes Will
Disappear by 2030
By Tom Schaffnit
The convergence of technologies that
connect and automate vehicles will keep
us all safer on the road.
Two technologies related to vehicle
safety are converging to significantly
reduce or even eliminate accidents.
1. Connected vehicle technology
uses specific wireless connections to
allow cars to “talk” with each other
and provide a warning when a conflict situation exists that is likely to
result in a crash. The vehicles each
broadcast a short message a number
of times every second. Other vehicles receive these broadcasts and
compute a dynamic state map in order to identify potential conflict situations, such as hard-braking events
up ahead in their lane of travel.
2. Automated vehicle technology.
Google’s self-driving vehicle project
has been able to demonstrate the
convenience aspect of this advanced
form of automated vehicle technology. Automobile manufacturers,
meanwhile, have been conducting
their own research programs and introducing automation features that
assist with lane-keeping and help to
maintain a safe distance from the car
ahead, for example. These auto36
THE FUTURIST
mated vehicle technology deployments have mainly
been based upon
autonomous sensors located on the
individual vehicles.
A convergence of
the two technologies, along with
sensory fusion to
allow the best use
o f b o t h a u t o n o - OLEG GOLOVNEV / BIGSTOCK
mous sensors and
wireless communications from
nearby vehicles, could lower costs
and enhance consumer enthusiasm,
ushering in connected, fully automated vehicles by the end of this
decade. The disappearance of car
crashes by 2030 could be a realistic
possibility.
Nothing Left to Try?
The End of Jury Trials
By Clayton Rawlings
In theory, a jury trial is a search for
the truth in a way that ensures both
sides can be heard. The jury itself is
the fact finder. They determine what
the truth is based on the evidence
admitted before them.
But the types of cases that juries
are asked to consider will decline.
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
Consider that there are now 35,000
fatalities and 400,000 catastrophic injuries in the United States every year
from vehicle collisions. By 2030, robotic transportation will reduce
these numbers dramatically. Robotic
labor will reduce the number of
workplace injuries on a similar scale.
We will not have thousands of jury
trials rendering personal injury verdicts, because we will no longer
have the huge number of injury
cases to be decided.
Most drug crimes will no longer
be enforced in criminal courts, as genetic manipulation and vaccinations
to cure addiction will do away with
these crimes. Sixty-five percent of all
criminal prosecutions are drug related, so removing drugs from the
equation medically will eliminate
the need for juries to convict and
sentence those involved in the drug
trade.
More Missing Futures
The End of Theft
In the country of India, a car is stolen every 6 minutes, but
in the state of Texas, a car is stolen every 5.5 minutes. As
every business knows, theft is a major problem, with most
viewing some percentage loss as unavoidable. However,
that attitude is about to change.
With improved security systems, vehicle theft has been
dropping since 1998, and will be all but eliminated by 2030
with the Internet of Things.
By 2020, more than 50 billion devices will be connected to
the Internet, and by 2030, virtually every item of value will
become traceable because of smart dust sensors.
Next-generation manufacturing will automatically embed
smart dust particles with sensors and transmitters into
everything we own. Whenever a purchase occurs, items
over a certain dollar value will be assigned to a personal
ownership network that we control.
Sensors in our clothing, cars, jewelry, shoes, and homes
will be primarily used to detect everything from air quality to
health irregularities, but they will also alert an “owner” when
a theft has occurred.
Whenever there is a “disturbance in the force,” officials
will be notified.
—Thomas Frey
Brain-scanning lie-detector tests already exist, but their results are still inadmissible, having failed to gain scientific acceptance as being reliable.
Moore’s law suggests that we’ll see a
scanner that will pass this last evidentiary hurdle in the next 10 to 15 years.
When a reliable scanner can detect deception in the human mind, the need
for a fact finder will be greatly reduced in all litigation. The fact finder
(jury) will not be needed to know the
truth.
This new reality will do away with
the swearing match that goes on today. When the end is no longer in
doubt, litigants will settle cases rather
than incur the expense of a jury trial
that is doomed to fail.
I predict that jury trials will all but
disappear except for some special
circumstances by 2030. They will be
replaced by judicial intervention and
summary judgment. When the facts
are no longer in dispute, agreed settlements through mediation by both
parties will become the norm, rather
than the traditional jury trial.
Here is a selection of other things our
readers suggested may disappear by 2030:
• Accountants. Traditional accountants
will be replaced by “Meta-digital Accounting (MdA).… Analysis of, and transactions
involving, economic and financial data will
be automated; no human presence is required.”
—Alexandru Tugui
• The American Dream. “Seventeen
years from now the ‘Dream’ may not have
totally disappeared, but expectations of
achieving it will be smaller and may require two or three salaries for a family to
have the American Dream that we had in
the 1970s.”
—Lester Kuhl
• Artificial scarcity. “With the advent of
3-D printing and nanotechnology, the illusion of artificial scarcity should break down
once … awareness of these technologies
spreads and the implications of the capacity
for global abundance becomes realized.”
—Jonathan C. Lippe
• Circus animals. “By 2030, elephants
won’t be balancing on balls, tigers won’t be
jumping through hoops of fire, and bears
won’t be tightrope walkers.... Animals are gaining support
from a wide variety of organizations intent on protecting
them by legislation and legal action.”
—LuAnne Feik
• Fire Trucks. “City managers recognizing the waste of
sending 50,000-pound fire engines hurtling to a non-fire-
related emergency will replace them with a modern communications system that provides rapid intelligence as to whether
nature of the emergency. Instead, the more frugal option of
SUV rescue sedans will be at the ready.” —Frank McDonough
• Forest Fires. “Within the next few years, flying drone
technology will advance to the point where solar powered
micro-drones will be able to achieve month-long flights without interruption. Once accomplished, we will begin equipping drones with infrared sensors to monitor any fires activity inside a forest.
“With proper fleet management, swarms of flying drones
will be capable of detecting any fire before it reaches 100
square feet in size. Once a fire is detected, the drone network
will instantly signal for fire extinguisher drones to fly over
and extinguish it.
“Within 10 years, virtually all forest fires will be eliminated. However, not all fires are bad fires, and society
will begin to debate the much larger philosophical question of who will get to decide.”
—Thomas Frey
• Genders “will be nonexistent in civil law, in fashion, fragrance, and everyday life.”
—Peter Eder
www.wfs.org
•
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
37
• Human service. Advertisements promoting the benefits of talking to a real person (rather than an AI entity) will disappear. “That’s
because ‘real people’ aren’t as fabulous as we often make them out to
be. They can be inconsistent, moody, and make mistakes. They suffer
from a long list of cognitive biases and prejudices. … In contrast, the
automated, intelligent systems being developed by Google, IBM, and
others won’t suffer from any of those drawbacks.”
—Garry Schulz
• Intelligence “will be extinct by 2030—that is, the ability to think
for oneself, to reason things out independently of a preponderance of
false data coming in.”
—Ruth Wise
• Musical composers. “The music created by … algorithms can be
saved to a computer/iPad with sheet music software. Entrepreneurs
will present millions of pages to the public at a minimal cost. Festivals of spontaneously written music will flood the stadiums. Bye-Bye
Sheet Music Pie.”
—Douglas Cornish
• Pennies and other coins are “becoming less useful, as parking
meters, tolls, and public transit use smartcards and RFID technologies to streamline payment. Presumably by 2030 we will also see
widespread acceptance of virtual currencies such as Bitcoin.”
—Virginia Holbert
• Plastic “for packaging material will be replaced by sustainable
packaging material and strategies for the reduction of packaging
worldwide in 2030.”
—Werner Mittelstaedt
• Quiet in public places “will have disappeared, thanks to ubiquitous and intrusive electronic gadgets, visual and audio advertising
everywhere, and ego-driven social manners.”
—Peter Eder
• Republicans and Democrats. “Both parties will be gone. They
will have morphed into two new parties representing even more extreme i deals, and a viable third party will exist.”
—Dave Allman, Elliott Wave International
About the Authors
Karl Albrecht is an executive management
consultant, business futurist, lecturer, and
author of more than 20 books on professional achievement, organizational performance, and business strategy. E-mail
Karl@KarlAlbrecht.com.
Rob Bencini, MBA, is a Certified Economic
Developer (CEcD) and economic futurist
from North Carolina. He provides trend impact analysis for businesses and local governments. Web site www.robbencini.com;
E‑mail rbencini@earthlink.net.
Jim Breaux is a futures studies graduate
student in the Foresight Master’s Program,
University of Houston, College of Technology. He received the APF 2013 Student
Recognition Award, Individual Graduate
Student, for his paper, “Weather-Related
Disaster Recovery.” He is an engineer by
training and works with a major infrastructure engineering firm in Texas. E-mail
breauxjw@gmail.com.
Morton Chalfy is a poet and novelist living
in California. E-mail mchalfy@gmail.com.
Apala Lahiri Chavan is chief oracle and
innovator at Human Factors International
(HFI). She is an award-winning designer
(International Audi Design Award), and has
recently been made CEO of the Institute of
Customer Experience (ice.humanfactors.com/),
a nonprofit initiative by HFI to explore the
future of global user experience. E-mail
apala@humanfactors.com.
• Sex. “New technologies … will provide safe, sanitary, ubiquitous, consequence-free sexual pleasure. In-the-flesh interaction
with other humans will be purely optional and increasingly rare—
in fact it may come to be seen as a fetish rather than ‘normal’ sexual
behavior.”
—Virginia Holbert
Brenda Cooper is a technology professional, a science-fiction writer, and a public
speaker who lives in the Pacific Northwest.
She is associated with Futurist.com. E-mail
brenda-cooper@sff.net.
• Shame. “We are losing our collective belief in what is right and
wrong. Our shared ethos is giving way to a situational morality more
dependent on who commits the infraction rather than the act itself.”
—Gregory Pashke
John F. Copper is the Stanley J. Buckman
Professor (emeritus) of International Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. He is the author of more than thirty
books. E-mail johnfcopper@gmail.com.
• Wilderness. “We are losing wilderness around the earth as the
human population grows. More and more wilderness is being converted to farmland, mines, roads, towns and cities, and other human
uses. Climate change is also significantly altering wilderness, even in
protected areas. Aside from Antarctica, Greenland, deserts, parts of
the United States (particularly Alaska), the Amazon, Canada, and Siberia, there likely will only be a few protected wilderness areas left
for people to experience wild, primeval, undeveloped, and untrammeled areas—and those areas will all show varying signs of human
imprints.”
—Michael Rees
38
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
•
www.wfs.org
E. Scott Denison is a design lecturer at
Ohio State University. His article “When Designers Ask, ‘What If?’” was published in
World Future Review’s Summer 2012 conference edition. E-mail scott@scottdenison
.com.
Jed Diamond is founder and director of
MenAlive, a health program that helps men,
and the women who love them, to live well
throughout their lives. Visit MenAlive.com.
Daniel Egger is a business futurist, entrepreneur, and strategist, helping clients create a more comprehensive understanding
of what could drive the future and how to
influence the present. E-mail daniel@
foltigo.com.
Thomas Frey is executive director of the
Da Vinci Institute and the Innovation editor
of THE FUTURIST magazine. His Web site
is Futuristspeaker.com.
Lisa Gualtieri, PhD, ScM, is an assistant
professor in the Department of Public
Health and Community Medicine at Tufts
University School of Medicine. E-mail
lisa.gualtieri@tufts.edu.
William E. Halal is professor emeritus of
management, technology, and innovation at
George Washington University, and president of TechCast LLC, a virtual think tank
tracking the technology revolution. Visit
www.techcast.org.
Lane Jennings is managing editor of World
Future Review as well as a poet. E-mail
lanejen@aol.com.
Liz Leone is an editor for Rodale and a
medical editor for GSK. E-mail liz@lizleone
.com.
Josh Lindenger is a futurist hailing from
Baltimore, Maryland, with a not-so-secret
desire to re-explore what it means to “get
lost” in cities using the techniques of psychogeography. You can find him at
www.thefuturesunderground.com or as
@jlindenger on Twitter. E-mail josh@
thefuturesunderground.com.
Lawrence Loh is a faculty member at NUS
Business School, National University of
Singapore, where he teaches strategic
management, global strategy, and corporate governance. He is also leading the
Governance & Transparency Index (GTI)
project, which ranks and publishes the corporate governance performance of listed
firms in Singapore. E-mail bizlohyk@
nus.edu.sg.
Frank McDonough enjoyed more than 40
years of federal service, holding senior executive positions in four U.S. government
organizations. He is currently working on a
book titled Advice to Fernando, with 50
chapters discussing how to succeed in
high-level government jobs. Visit
frankamcdonough.com/.
Barry Minkin, author of The Great Unraveling (2012), 2020 Future Vision (forthcoming, 2014), and other books, is a futurist,
speaker, and global management consultant. Visit minkinaffiliates.com.
Alan Nordstrom is a professor of English
at Rollins College, Winter Park, Florida.
E‑mail ANordstrom@Rollins.edu.
Manuel Au-Yong Oliveira is an invited lecturer at the University of Porto and at the
University of Aveiro (Portugal), Department
of Economics, Management and Industrial
Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus
Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro,
Portugal, and Researcher at INESC TEC
(coordinated by INESC Porto), Faculty of
Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr.
Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. E-mail moliveira@fe.up.pt.
Jean Georges Perrin runs a software company, focusing on content analysis and logistics. E-mail jgp@jgp.net.
Neill Perry has many years of experience
in the field of marketing and sales as an independent manufacturer’s rep. He writes on
a variety of nonfiction topics, short stories,
and how he envisions the future. E-mail
4neillperry@gmail.com.
Alexandre Pupo is an information technology professional and editor for the TechCast Project.
Clayton Rawlings is a licensed attorney in
the state of Texas who has tried over 150
jury trials. He attended the Strategic Foresight program at the University of Houston
under Peter Bishop. Web site HamptonandRawlings.com; e-mail Clayrawlings@
aol.com.
Michael Rees is a natural resource planner
with the National Park Service and has
worked for the NPS for over 21 years. His
views are his own and do not reflect the
views of the agency.
Paul Rux, PhD, is a lifelong professional
educator. E-mail paulrux@paulrux.net.
Paul Saffo is a forecaster with more than
two decades of experience exploring the
dynamics of large-scale, long-term change.
He is managing director of foresight at Discern Analytics, www.discern.com, and a
member of the World Future Society’s
Global Advisory Council.
Harish Shah is an entrepreneur, consultant, coach, trainer, futurist, and sole proprietor at Stratserv Consultancy, Singapore.
E-mail harish_shah@stratservconsultancy
.com.
Jason Siko is an assistant professor of educational technology at Grand Valley State
University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He is
a graduate of the Futures Studies program
at the University of Houston, whose interests include online learning, the gamification of learning, and the future of K-12 education. E-mail sikojp@gmail.com.
John M. Smart is a technology foresight
scholar, educator, speaker, and consultant.
He is president of the Acceleration Studies
Foundation. Blog: EverSmarterWorld.com.
David Pearce Snyder is a consulting
futurist and the Lifestyles editor for THE
FUTURIST. E-mail david_snyder@verizon
.net.
Jason Swanson is a futurist living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. You can follow Jason
at twitter.com/JasonSwanson and
www.eufo.org.
Joe Thomae is a real estate asset manager. E-mail thomaej@gmail.com.
Dan Tuuri is a faculty member in the College of Business and a student in the Doctoral of Community College Leadership at
Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan. E-mail dan@tuuri.us.
Cynthia G. Wagner is editor of THE
FUTURIST. E-mail cwagner@wfs.org.
Benjamin C. Yablon is a prominent attorney in Denver, Colorado, and author of two
novels: Pure Life and its forthcoming sequel,
The Chinese Dam. Visit www.PureLifeNovel
.com. E-mail bcy@appletreepublishing.com.
Richard Yonck is a foresight analyst for
Intelligent Future LLC in Seattle. E-mail
ryonck@intelligent-future.com.
Carrie Anne Zapka is a microbiologist in
R&D at GOJO Industries by day and an industrial and organizational psychology student by night. E-mail nuts4ideas@gmail.com.
John Sagi is a professor of business at
Anne Arundel Community College, Arnold,
Maryland. He is on the board of AACC’s Institute for the Future. E-mail jsagi@aacc.edu.
Tom Schaffnit is an internationally recognized expert in wireless telecommunications
technology and co-author of The Comprehensive Guide to Wireless Technologies
(first edition 1999, APDG Publishing).
E‑mail tom@schaffnit.com.
www.wfs.org
•
THE FUTURIST
September-October 2013
39
Copyright of Futurist is the property of World Future Society and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment